Skip to content

Effect of VR and Accommdation Relax on Controlling Myopia in Children

Effect of Virtual Reality and Accommodation Relax Techniques in Combination on Controlling Myopia Development in School-aged Children

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03427697
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2018-02-09
Start date
2020-09-18
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2020-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accommodation Spasm, Children, Myopia

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effect of virtual reality and accommodation relax technique on controlling onset and development of myopia in school-aged children. Half of the children will receive head-mounted video display which shows video with virtual reality and accommodation relax technique in combination, while the other half will receive no intervention.

Interventions

DEVICEVirtual reality and accommodation relax techniques in combination

The children will be given head-mounted video display to watch video at break of classes, 40 minutes per day in total. The video will be shown by virtual reality and accommodation relax techniques in combination.

Sponsors

Beijing Tongren Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Best corrected visual acuity \>=20/20 for each eye; * Astigmastism less than 1.5 D; * Anisometropia less than 1.0D; * No other ocular or systematic diseases;

Exclusion criteria

* Can not endure virtual reality video; * Can not cooperate with ocular examinations; * Receiving other interventions for controlling myopia;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myopia progressionOne yearThe change in spherical equivalent
Axial elongationOne yearChnage in axial length

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accommodative lagOne week and One monthDifference between accommodative demand and accommodative response measured by an open-field autorefractor (WAM-5500, Grand Seiko Co Ltd, Hiroshima, Japan)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026