Skip to content

Audio Recording During Laparoscopic Surgery

Audio Recording During Laparoscopic Surgery - The Impact on Conversation Between Surgeons

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03425175
Enrollment
41
Registered
2018-02-07
Start date
2017-08-29
Completion date
2017-09-28
Last updated
2018-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Communication, Communication, Multidisciplinary, Laparoscopy, Perioperative/Postoperative Complications

Keywords

Non-relevant conversation, Surgical safety, Audio recording

Brief summary

In september 2017 audio recording during laparoscopic general surgery was implemented as routine a Lindesbergs hospital. The study was designed to observe operations before and after the introduction of audio recording. The main outcome of the study was time spent on non-relevant conversation.

Detailed description

In september 2017 audio recording during laparoscopic general surgery was implemented as routine a Lindesbergs hospital. One single observer not working at the department observed consecutive operations before and after the introduction of audio recordings. All elective laparoscopic procedures were included. There was no available data to support a Power-calculation why we intended to include 20 patients in each arm of the study. Exclusion criteria were refusal of operating team or patient to participate in the study, or planned open surgery. Potential disturbances were recorded by the observer. The main outcome was time with non-relevant conversation (for the operation or as part of education).

Interventions

OTHERAudio-recoring

Recording of audio through microphone carried bu surgeon and assistant surgeon

Sponsors

Örebro University, Sweden
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Örebro County
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open label

Intervention model description

Non-randomised intervenion

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Elective laparoscopic general surgery -

Exclusion criteria

R, planned open surgery, refusal to participate (patient or operating team) \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-relevant conversationOperation. Measured from from the start of the operation (WHO surgical safety checklist) until end of operation (last stitch in place)Time spent on non-relevant conversation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complication30 days after surgerycomplication occuring within the first 30 Days after surgery
Intraoperative unplanned eventOperation. Measured from from the start of the operation (WHO surgical safety checklist) until end of operation (last stitch in place)Any deviation from expected events during the surgical procedure
Corrections of assistant surgeonOperation. Measured from from the start of the operation (WHO surgical safety checklist) until end of operation (last stitch in place)number of corrections of assistant surgeon made by the operating surgeon
Operation timeOperation. Measured from from the start of the operation (WHO surgical safety checklist) until end of operation (last stitch in place)Length of operation

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026