Skip to content

Low-dose Whole Body Computed Tomography Scanning

Low-dose Whole Body Computed Tomography Scanning

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03425032
Enrollment
520
Registered
2018-02-07
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2018-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Computed Tomography, Image Quality

Brief summary

Computed tomography represents the mainstay for diagnosing various diseases in the whole body. Over the past decade, enormous efforts were undertaken by both CT manufacturers and radiologist to reduce the radiation dose to patients. Today, the dose is significantly lower that it was before the era of multislice CT and iterative reconstruction methods. The X-ray beam originating from the tube in a CT system contains a spectrum of different energies, whereby the harder beams with higher energy penetrate the patient better, and the softer beams will be absorbed through the patient's tissues. Recent research has been shown that the radiation dose can be further reduced by improved primary beam filtering in CT. This study is intended to compare the radiation dose in clinically indicated, routine CT examination while maintaining a diagnostic image quality, on a new CT system with modified primary beam filtering.

Detailed description

At the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (JDMI), the investigators periodically adjust the radiation dose and modify the clinical imaging protocols in order to continuously optimize image quality in CT. The investigators have formalized the process of radiation dose adjustments by implementing a CT dose committee that meets on a monthly basis and reviews imaging protocols (SOP). The committee includes radiologists, technologists, vendor representative (if needed), managers and the radiation protection officer. Part of the review is the investigator's in-house developed Coral image quality review program as well as the clinically used radiation dose monitoring software (Radiometric). Part of the evaluation study of the new CT system is to monitor 520 patients who will undergo a clinically indicated CT scan on the new system. Identical to standard-of-care (SOC) quality insurance, the investigators will use the existing monitoring software (Radiometric, JDMI) in order to capture the data in the existing database. The investigators will also capture quality data through the existing CT image quality feedback tool. After installation of the new CT system, the investigators will maintain the radiation dose as currently applied in the standard JDMI wide imaging protocols and examine 20 patients on the new system; radiation dose and image quality feedback will be recorded in the identical fashion to standard operating procedures (CT image quality and radiation dose committee). Subsequently, the investigators will drop the dose by approx. 10% for each scanning protocol and scan the subsequent 250 patients while concurrently analyzing the impact on the collective dose to the patient population. Based on the expected increase in image noise, the investigators will calculate the possible additional dose reduction in percent and modify all protocols accordingly for the subsequent 250 patients. This step-down approach ensures that no CT scan will be performed with too little dose, and that all CT scans remain diagnostic.

Interventions

Regular CT imaging of the abdomen and pelvis

Sponsors

University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are clinically scheduled for a CT of the body (any part, or a combination of different parts).

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiation doseThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearMean radiation dose (DLP), comparison to existing data (Radimetrics database)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026