Skip to content

To Compare the Efficacy of Surgery Followed by Sunitinib With Surgery Followed by Imatinib in GIST Patients With Progression on Imatinib.

A Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03424876
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-02-07
Start date
2017-06-02
Completion date
2018-08-08
Last updated
2018-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

GIST

Keywords

Sunitinib Imatinib

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy of surgery followed by sunitinib with surgery followed by imatinib in GIST patients with progression on imatinib;To investigate the optimal therapy after surgery in GIST patients with focal or multifocal progression in imatinib

Detailed description

Primary Endpoint: To evaluate the progression free survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib Secondary Endpoint:To evaluate the overall survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib the relationship of c-kit secondary mutation and progression free survival of surgery followed by TKI therapy the safety and tolerability of the two therapy. Statistics:All the statistical analysis is performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM corporation, United States). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. PFS and OS analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival difference. A two sided p-value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Interventions

exposure 400 mg/day or 600mg/day,

DRUGSunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsule

exposure 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2)

Sponsors

Peking University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. .Histopathological diagnosis of metastatic GIST. 2. . After the treatment of imatinib, imatinib 400mg/day after treatment, the tumor generalized. 3. . Patients with generalized progress were satisfied with tumor reduction after imatinib resistance for various reasons. 4. at least 1 month after surgery for imatinib treatment or sunitinib treatment. 5. at least one imaging assessment was received after surgery. 6. . Complete clinical data and follow-up data.

Exclusion criteria

1. . Before operation, he was treated with sunitinib 2. . Patients receiving tumor reduction were not satisfied with the standard of the reduction of tumor. 3. . The treatment of imatinib or sunitinib after surgery was less than 1 month. 4. . Incomplete clinical data or follow-up data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficiency12 monthsThe curative effect was evaluated by measuring the unprogression-survival (PFS) each treatment group.
Security12 monthsClinical and laboratory toxicity/symptoms will be graded according to the nci-ctc toxicity criteria.
Molecular marker detection12 monthsGene mutation of c-kit/PDGFRA of imatinib resistance

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLin Shen, MD
goodjf@163.com010-88196088
Backup ContactJian Li, MD
oncogene@163.com010-88196088

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026