GIST
Conditions
Keywords
Sunitinib Imatinib
Brief summary
To compare the efficacy of surgery followed by sunitinib with surgery followed by imatinib in GIST patients with progression on imatinib;To investigate the optimal therapy after surgery in GIST patients with focal or multifocal progression in imatinib
Detailed description
Primary Endpoint: To evaluate the progression free survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib Secondary Endpoint:To evaluate the overall survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib the relationship of c-kit secondary mutation and progression free survival of surgery followed by TKI therapy the safety and tolerability of the two therapy. Statistics:All the statistical analysis is performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM corporation, United States). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. PFS and OS analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival difference. A two sided p-value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Interventions
exposure 400 mg/day or 600mg/day,
exposure 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. .Histopathological diagnosis of metastatic GIST. 2. . After the treatment of imatinib, imatinib 400mg/day after treatment, the tumor generalized. 3. . Patients with generalized progress were satisfied with tumor reduction after imatinib resistance for various reasons. 4. at least 1 month after surgery for imatinib treatment or sunitinib treatment. 5. at least one imaging assessment was received after surgery. 6. . Complete clinical data and follow-up data.
Exclusion criteria
1. . Before operation, he was treated with sunitinib 2. . Patients receiving tumor reduction were not satisfied with the standard of the reduction of tumor. 3. . The treatment of imatinib or sunitinib after surgery was less than 1 month. 4. . Incomplete clinical data or follow-up data.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | 12 months | The curative effect was evaluated by measuring the unprogression-survival (PFS) each treatment group. |
| Security | 12 months | Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptoms will be graded according to the nci-ctc toxicity criteria. |
| Molecular marker detection | 12 months | Gene mutation of c-kit/PDGFRA of imatinib resistance |
Countries
China