Traumatic Brain Injury
Conditions
Keywords
Transition, Rehabilitation Discharge
Brief summary
Each year, about 2.8 million people sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States, and at least 25 percent of these injuries are classified as moderate to severe. Nearly half of those hospitalized for TBI have long-term disability. Most have psychological, physical, social, or work-related problems, which often become chronic. By talking with patients and family members, we found that returning to daily activities and regaining quality of life are major concerns. Outcomes are affected by the type and severity of the TBI, but the type of treatment someone with TBI receives is also important. What resources are available, whether providers are experienced with the problems associated with TBI, and how much treatment is available can affect outcomes as well. Currently, inpatient rehabilitation professionals are told to give people with TBI information, reassurance, advice, and referral resources. Some promising ways of helping people with TBI include using telephone and other mobile devices to reach patients after they leave the hospital, to regularly assess their individual needs and help them coordinate their health care, and to provide the information and resources that they need. These new strategies may lead to earlier return to activities and improved quality of life. No studies have compared the standard approach to discharge care with an approach that uses telecare to provide information and care coordination after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation for TBI. The main goal of this project is to find out how improving the transition from the hospital to outpatient care can improve the lives of people with moderate to severe TBI and achieve better results that are important to patients with TBI, their families, and healthcare providers. In this study, patients with TBI who are discharged from inpatient rehabilitation at one of six national TBI Model Systems sites (University of Washington, Indiana University, Ohio State University, Mount Sinai Hospital, Moss Rehabilitation, and Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation) will be randomized (like the flip of a coin) to either the standard discharge plan or the standard discharge plan with additional telephone follow up from a TBI care manager for the first 6 months after discharge. The project team will compare patient and caregiver functioning and quality of life at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after hospital discharge in these two groups.
Detailed description
Screening The screening process involves a review of medical records by our research staff for patients with a diagnosis of TBI, or suspected TBI, (see inclusion/exclusion for further detail) who are admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation unit at the study sites. Recruitment Patient Participants: If a potential participant meets eligibility criteria based on medical record review, research staff will approach him/her on the inpatient rehabilitation unit to determine whether the patient is cognitively capable of providing consent by administering a measure of orientation/ emergence from PTA. If the patient is deemed oriented, the research staff will introduce the study using a talking points script, and if the potential participant is interested, provide him/her with a brochure and a consent form. Research staff will initiate the informed consent process if: a) the patient is deemed oriented per definition above, and b) the patient expresses interest in participating. Research staff will visit the patient on a subsequent day and re-administer the orientation test prior to consent if needed. If the patient is not deemed oriented as per the outline above, the patient is deemed not yet oriented and unable at that time to provide informed consent. Research staff may administer the orientation test multiple times to determine capacity to consent. Research staff may talk with a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) if one is willing and available to attempt to obtain their consent if a patient is not deemed oriented prior to discharge. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 900 patient participants. Caregiver Participants: Caregiver participants will be those individuals who will have primary care giving responsibility following rehabilitation care discharge of patients with moderate to severe TBI. Caregivers may be recruited while the patient is in the hospital or by telephone, if not available during hospitalization. Research staff may enroll more than one individual as a caregiver following subject enrollment should a different individual assume the role of caregiver at a later time point. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 607 caregiver participants. Basic Demographic Information: All Potential Patient Participants Basic demographic information including age, sex, and race will be collected via medical record review without consent from all patients including those who do not enroll to determine differences between enrolled patients participants and those who do not enroll. Consent For patient participants, the informed consent process will take place during the participants inpatient rehabilitation stay with our research staff while they are inpatients. Potential participants will be fully informed of all risks and benefits prior to giving their written informed consent and prior to enrollment in the study. Participants may take time to think about participating and render a decision in a subsequent visit. Potential participants will be asked to repeat back understanding of this material as necessary. Research staff will also review a HIPAA authorization form with the participant that permits research staff to collect data from his/her medical records regarding injury and medical history. Caregiver Participants: Caregiver participants may be initially recruited by telephone or in person. Caregivers will provide written consent if enrolled in person. All participants approached for possible enrollment in this study will be clearly informed that if they choose not to participate in this project, they and/or their loved one will still be able to receive any of the routine medical and rehabilitation services available to them. They will be informed that their participation is voluntary and that they may withdraw their consent and discontinue participation in the study at any time. Any new information developed during the course of the study that might affect a participant's understanding of the research and willingness to continue to participate will be brought to their attention by study staff. Baseline Assessment Contact Information Sheet Research staff will collect the following information from both caregiver and patient participants: (1) contact information; (2) best way to reach an individual if they have more than one line; best times/days to reach participant; and (3) names and contact information of people staff are allowed to contact if participant is lost to follow-up or otherwise cannot be contacted (i.e. collateral contacts). Baseline Information: Demographic and injury related data will be collected from the electronic medical record, and additional demographic and clinical history will be collected in interview format. A cognitive assessment focused on memory, concentration, and problem solving will be given. These data will be entered in de-identified form into the NDSC centralized database by research staff. Discharge Information: Research staff will collect information from a patient participant's medical record regarding the presence/absence of recommended and/or scheduled appointments to different medical disciplines/services. Specific information regarding the recommended/scheduled appointments (e.g. name, phone number, email address, date of scheduled appointment, etc.) of patient participants randomized to the rehabilitation transition phase (RTP) group will be stored locally in a database used by the TBI care managers for referential purposes. The investigators will collect information regarding the nature of the caregiver's relationship to the patient participant, as well as basic demographic information. These data will be entered in de-identified form into the NDSC centralized database by research staff. Randomization/ Post-Discharge Transition Phase After the patient participant has been discharged, s/he will be randomly assigned 1:1 into one of two study arms: Rehabilitation Discharge Plan (RDP) group or the Rehabilitation Transition Plan (RTP) group. The investigators will stratify randomization on study site and discharge destination (another facility vs. home/ community). Once randomization occurs, their random assignment will be communicated to the TBI Care Manager (TCM). The TCM will then send out a letter to the patient participant and caregiver (if applicable). RTP Process Variables Individual elements of the RTP will be measured as they are administered to each patient/ caregiver or other recipient in the form of a treatment note as captured in a secure database, incorporating documentation elements used in the field. Measures will include the clock time devoted to each contact, the recipient of each contact, total number of attempts/contacts, the type of need or issue discussed, and actions planned and implemented. Follow Up Data Collection 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months Post Hospital Discharge: Patient Participant The 3, 6, 9 and 12 month post-hospital discharge questionnaire will take approximately 45-60 minutes to complete, and will be completed by phone or in person. This questionnaire includes both the primary and secondary outcomes described below.
Interventions
CARF standards for discharge following an inpatient rehabilitation stay for a traumatic brain injury. This approach may include the following: 1. patient and family education about TBI, both general and individualized to each person's symptoms and level of function, as well as education on medications and symptoms to monitor following discharge; 2. written discharge care instructions, including recommended appointments with primary care, rehabilitation medicine and outpatient therapies, and medication list which are reviewed with the patient and family prior to discharge; and 3. a phone call from an inpatient care provider within a few days of discharge to address any immediate problems and ensure that equipment has arrived, medications are being taken, etc.
Participants and their caregivers (if applicable) randomized to the Rehabilitation Transition Plan group will receive up to 12 scheduled contacts 6 months post-discharge from a TBI care manager familiar with the care and resource networks at the respective sites. The contacts will at minimum be by telephone, although a HIPAA-compliant video conferencing option will also be available. The content of these contacts will include: 1. Particularly in the first few calls, review of discharge plans and assistance and/or directive problem-solving around any obstacles to following discharge plans; 2. Assessment of unmet needs, developed into a standard checklist of areas of need that are relevant to TBI, culled from literature on need fulfillment in this population.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
This study uses masked outcome assessment, which means study researchers will make every effort to ensure that staff members who collect outcomes data from both patient and caregiver participants at 3-, 6-, 9- and 12 months are unaware of patient participants' treatment group allocation.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Hospitalized with a moderate-to-severe TBI defined by TBIMS and this study as damage to brain tissue caused by an external mechanical force as evidenced by medically documented loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) due to brain trauma or by objective neurological findings that can be reasonably attributed to TBI on physical examination or mental status examination. Potential participants must meet at least one of the following criteria to be considered experiencing a moderate-to-severe TBI: 1. PTA\>24 hours; 2. Trauma related intracranial neuroimaging abnormalities; 3. Loss of consciousness exceeding 30 minutes (unless due to sedation or intoxication); or 4. Glasgow Coma Scale in the emergency department of less than 13 (unless due to intubation, sedation, or intoxication). 2. English speaking (we will track non-enrollment due to other language to determine common languages and have consumer dissemination materials translated for more broad use if time and resources permit.); 3. At least 18 years old; 4. Will be discharged from inpatient rehabilitation to community (private residence, adult home, hotel, homeless) or facility (nursing home, subacute care i.e. skilled nursing facility); 5. Current admission to inpatient rehabilitation considered their first comprehensive rehabilitation experience, or extension thereof for most recent TBI (e.g. admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, discharged to acute care, then returns to inpatient rehabilitation to complete their initial stay); 6. Able to provide informed consent, or if unable to provide consent have family or legal guardian to provide informed consent for the patient. Inclusion Criteria- Caregiver Participants: 1. Individuals who will have primary care giving responsibility post rehabilitation care discharge of enrolled patient participants; 2. English speaking (we will track non-enrollment due to other language to determine common languages and have consumer dissemination materials translated for more broad use if time and resources permit.); 3. At least 18 years old; 4. Able to provide informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. | A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life. |
| Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. | The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Zarit Burden Interview | This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes. | 12 item version addresses the concerns that our stakeholders feel are most important and that we feel are most relevant to our study interventions. The minimum and maximum values are 0 to 88, with 88 representing the most burden (worst outcome). |
| Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12) | This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes. | The SF-12 is a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and allows for 2 component scores to be determined: physical health and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning. |
| PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a | This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes. | A measure that assesses engagement in roles and activities apart from those related to caregiving. Raw scores are converted to scale scores, with a range of 26.2 to 65.6, with the higher score indicating better outcome. |
| Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance | This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes. | A measure developed by the study team to describe the use of caregivers for individuals with TBI. The Required Assistance portion of the measure asks how much oversight or supervision the patient needs on a daily basis, ranging from 1) Need someone in the room awake at all time to 12) Lives independently with minimal assistance. Responses were categorized into three levels with 1-8 equaling Need supervision, 9-10 equaling Need assistance, and 11-12 equaling Independent. |
| Cornell Services Index | This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. | A patient-reported instrument created to assess healthcare services utilization. This reports the number and percentage of individuals who attended at least one visit of a specialty during follow-up, regardless of whether they had been recommended and/or scheduled at discharge. |
| Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. | A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life. |
| Satisfaction With Care | This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. 6-month outcomes are reported. | A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with health care received by the patient participant. Patients, caregivers, both, or another appropriate proxy could rate their satisfaction with different domain's of the patient's care on a 1-7 scale, where 1 = Very dissatisfied, 7 = Very satisfied, and 4 = Neutral. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction (better outcome). |
| RTP Satisfaction Survey | This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from both patient and caregiver participants (if applicable) randomized to the RTP group 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care (if they consented to complete the survey). | A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with RTP (intervention), measured through Likert-scaled and open-ended questions. |
| Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes. | The Reason for Assistance measure asks which category captures the reason the patient cannot be alone (if in the Need supervision or Need assistance category for Required Assistance). |
| Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | This outcome will be assessed longitudinally via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3,6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. | The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome. |
| Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale | This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes. | A 15-item measure, each with a 7-point scale that assesses change in social functioning, emotional well-being, and physical health related to caregiving. Item scores are transformed to 1-7, then summed to provide total scale scores ranging from 15 - 105, with a higher score indicating a better outcome. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Patient participants were recruited from 6 IPR facilities starting in Feb 2018 through Aug 2021. Caregivers (CG) of enrolled patients were recruited from the first patient enrollment through the end of patient participation. The final CG enrolled in February 2022. Patients could have more than one CG enrolled in the study due to changes in primary caregiver responsibility. Only one CG completed each follow up (max N at any follow up 591), but a total of 611 CG were enrolled throughout the study.
Pre-assignment details
11 patients were enrolled but not randomized in the study for the following reasons: Determined to be ineligible, death, withdrew, and other. The majority (8) were determined to be ineligible. 8 caregivers were enrolled to patients that were not randomized. So a total of 19 of the 1555 enrolled patients and caregivers were not part of the randomized cohort.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) standards for discharge following an inpatient rehabilitation stay for a traumatic brain injury, including patient and family education, written discharge care instructions, and telephone follow up from a clinical provider.
Rehabilitation Discharge Plan: CARF standards for discharge following an inpatient rehabilitation stay for a traumatic brain injury. This approach may include the following:
1. patient and family education about TBI, both general and individualized to each person's symptoms and level of function, as well as education on medications and symptoms to monitor following discharge;
2. written discharge care instructions, including recommended appointments with primary care, rehabilitation medicine and outpatient therapies, and medication list which are reviewed with the patient and family prior to discharge; and
3. a phone call from an inpatient care provider within a few days of discharge to address any immediate problems and ensure that equipment has arrived, medications are being taken, etc. | 462 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan Approximately 12 scheduled contacts from a TBI care manager 6 months following discharge in addition to the CARF standards for discharge.
Rehabilitation Transition Plan: Participants and their caregivers (if applicable) randomized to the Rehabilitation Transition Plan group will receive up to 12 scheduled contacts 6 months post-discharge from a TBI care manager familiar with the care and resource networks at the respective sites. The contacts will at minimum be by telephone, although a HIPAA-compliant video conferencing option will also be available.
The content of these contacts will include:
1. Particularly in the first few calls, review of discharge plans and assistance and/or directive problem-solving around any obstacles to following discharge plans;
2. Assessment of unmet needs, developed into a standard checklist of areas of need that are relevant to TBI, culled from literature on need fulfillment in this population. | 463 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan - Caregivers Caregivers of patients randomized to the Rehabilitation Discharge Plan (RDP) group | 309 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan - Caregivers Caregivers of patients randomized to the Rehabilitation Transition Plan (RTP) group | 302 |
| Total | 1,536 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 14 | 21 | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Discontinued, for caregiver, death of patient participant | 0 | 0 | 8 | 17 |
| Overall Study | Discontinued, for caregiver, patient participant was determined to be ineligible | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Discontinued, ineligible | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Discontinued, no longer caregiver for patient participant | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Discontinued, researcher decided not in participant's best interest | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Incarcerated prior to first follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 15 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 21 | 25 | 14 | 16 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Rehabilitation Discharge Plan - Caregivers | Rehabilitation Transition Plan - Caregivers | Total | Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Rehabilitation Discharge Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous Caregivers | 50 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 | 51 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 | 51 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 | — | — |
| Age, Continuous Patients | — | — | 47 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20 | 47 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20 | 48 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20 |
| Alcohol use problem | — | — | 208 Participants | 97 Participants | 111 Participants |
| Cause of injury Fall | — | — | 314 Participants | 146 Participants | 168 Participants |
| Cause of injury Other | — | — | 38 Participants | 22 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Cause of injury Vehicle (includes pedestrian/bike) | — | — | 480 Participants | 248 Participants | 232 Participants |
| Cause of injury Violence | — | — | 81 Participants | 41 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Competitively employed, yes | 202 Participants | 203 Participants | 957 Participants | 284 Participants | 268 Participants |
| Country of birth, USA | 278 Participants | 260 Participants | 538 Participants | — | — |
| Discharge to facility, yes | — | — | 178 Participants | 89 Participants | 89 Participants |
| Earnings 30K to less than 60K | 84 Participants | 70 Participants | 330 Participants | 89 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Earnings 60K or more | 76 Participants | 85 Participants | 327 Participants | 86 Participants | 80 Participants |
| Earnings Less than 30k | 41 Participants | 54 Participants | 263 Participants | 84 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Earnings None | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 322 Participants | 155 Participants | 167 Participants |
| Education Level College or more | 109 Participants | 119 Participants | 457 Participants | 128 Participants | 101 Participants |
| Education Level HS Diploma or GED | 85 Participants | 79 Participants | 477 Participants | 152 Participants | 161 Participants |
| Education Level Less than High School | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 149 Participants | 59 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Education Level Some College | 93 Participants | 84 Participants | 421 Participants | 118 Participants | 126 Participants |
| English spoken at home, yes | — | — | 861 Participants | 428 Participants | 433 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | — | — | 76 Participants | 29 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | — | — | 825 Participants | 423 Participants | 402 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | — | — | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ever attempted suicide, yes | — | — | 60 Participants | 35 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Ever had mental health treatment, yes | — | — | 248 Participants | 136 Participants | 112 Participants |
| Ever had psychiatric hospitalization, yes | — | — | 79 Participants | 40 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Ever served in military, yes | — | — | 115 Participants | 60 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Ever used illicit drugs, yes | — | — | 222 Participants | 120 Participants | 102 Participants |
| Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Cognitive subscale at discharge | — | — | 23 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 | 22.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 | 23 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 |
| Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor subscale at discharge | — | — | 63.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8 | 64.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7 | 63.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20 |
| Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score Mild (13-15) | — | — | 286 Participants | 127 Participants | 159 Participants |
| Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score Moderate (9-12) | — | — | 83 Participants | 42 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score Sedated/Intubated | — | — | 354 Participants | 182 Participants | 172 Participants |
| Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score Severe (3-8) | — | — | 120 Participants | 65 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Insurance type, yes Medicaid | — | — | 226 Participants | 118 Participants | 108 Participants |
| Insurance type, yes Medicare | — | — | 216 Participants | 98 Participants | 118 Participants |
| Insurance type, yes Other, Workers Comp, Charity | — | — | 97 Participants | 44 Participants | 53 Participants |
| Insurance type, yes Private/self | — | — | 379 Participants | 199 Participants | 180 Participants |
| Limitations prior to injury, yes | — | — | 431 Participants | 209 Participants | 222 Participants |
| Living alone at discharge, yes | — | — | 38 Participants | 15 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Living in private residence, yes | 302 Participants | 294 Participants | 596 Participants | — | — |
| Living in same household, yes | 195 Participants | 189 Participants | 384 Participants | — | — |
| Married/Partner, yes | 193 Participants | 194 Participants | 735 Participants | 189 Participants | 159 Participants |
| Person living with caregiver Alone | 23 Participants | 24 Participants | 47 Participants | — | — |
| Person living with caregiver Child/Children | 15 Participants | 27 Participants | 42 Participants | — | — |
| Person living with caregiver Other relative(s)/Adult Children | 23 Participants | 13 Participants | 36 Participants | — | — |
| Person living with caregiver Parent(s) | 16 Participants | 11 Participants | 27 Participants | — | — |
| Person living with caregiver Roommate(s) or Friend(s) | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | — | — |
| Person living with caregiver Siblings | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | — | — |
| Person living with caregiver Significant Other | 32 Participants | 27 Participants | 59 Participants | — | — |
| Person living with caregiver Spouse | 188 Participants | 191 Participants | 379 Participants | — | — |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black | 42 Participants | 44 Participants | 246 Participants | 79 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Hispanic | 24 Participants | 13 Participants | 123 Participants | 33 Participants | 53 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 16 Participants | 24 Participants | 99 Participants | 31 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 221 Participants | 214 Participants | 1045 Participants | 314 Participants | 296 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 309 participants | 302 participants | 1536 participants | 463 participants | 462 participants |
| Rehab length of stay | — | — | 26 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 24 | 26 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 26 | 26 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 23 |
| Relationship to patient Boyfriend, Girlfriend, Fiancé, Partner | 23 Participants | 20 Participants | 43 Participants | — | — |
| Relationship to patient Daughter or Son | 48 Participants | 32 Participants | 80 Participants | — | — |
| Relationship to patient Friend | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | — | — |
| Relationship to patient Other | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | — | — |
| Relationship to patient Other relative | 7 Participants | 9 Participants | 16 Participants | — | — |
| Relationship to patient Parent | 86 Participants | 89 Participants | 175 Participants | — | — |
| Relationship to patient Sibling | 19 Participants | 23 Participants | 42 Participants | — | — |
| Relationship to patient Spouse | 117 Participants | 114 Participants | 231 Participants | — | — |
| Residence zone of discharge Rural | — | — | 291 Participants | 152 Participants | 139 Participants |
| Residence zone of discharge Urban/Suburban | — | — | 615 Participants | 301 Participants | 314 Participants |
| Severity according to time in PTA 0 to 24h (mild) | — | — | 143 Participants | 70 Participants | 73 Participants |
| Severity according to time in PTA 25h to 7 days (moderate) | — | — | 90 Participants | 47 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Severity according to time in PTA More than 7 days (severe) | — | — | 603 Participants | 299 Participants | 304 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 218 Participants | 225 Participants | 691 Participants | 114 Participants | 134 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 91 Participants | 77 Participants | 845 Participants | 349 Participants | 328 Participants |
| Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), yes | — | — | 116 Participants | 58 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Years (decimal) know the patient | 30.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 | 30.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 | 30.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 | — | — |
| Years (decimal) lived in the same house | 19.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 | 18.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 | 18.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 | — | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 14 / 462 | 21 / 463 | 3 / 296 | 1 / 295 | 1 / 11 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 107 / 462 | 158 / 463 | 10 / 296 | 13 / 295 | 0 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 127 / 462 | 141 / 463 | 4 / 296 | 9 / 295 | 0 / 11 |
Outcome results
Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)
The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.
Population: Individuals with complete data for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 1.30 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 1.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)
A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life.
Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.
Population: Participants with complete data for this measure. This measure could only be collected from the patient (no proxy data).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 68.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 65.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale
A 15-item measure, each with a 7-point scale that assesses change in social functioning, emotional well-being, and physical health related to caregiving. Item scores are transformed to 1-7, then summed to provide total scale scores ranging from 15 - 105, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.
Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale | 60.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale | 60.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
Cornell Services Index
A patient-reported instrument created to assess healthcare services utilization. This reports the number and percentage of individuals who attended at least one visit of a specialty during follow-up, regardless of whether they had been recommended and/or scheduled at discharge.
Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.
Population: Individuals who had at least one follow-up interview.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Physical Therapy | 325 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neurosurgery | 162 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neuropsychology | 119 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neuro-optometry/Neuro-ophthalmology | 118 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Occupational Therapy | 262 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Social Worker | 83 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Rehabilitation Medicine | 260 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Psychologist/Mental health | 104 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Primary Care Visits | 347 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Vocational Counseling | 46 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neurology | 210 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Psychiatrist | 88 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Speech Therapy | 247 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Cornell Services Index | Vision Therapy | 32 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Speech Therapy | 261 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neuropsychology | 146 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neurology | 217 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Rehabilitation Medicine | 266 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Physical Therapy | 324 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Occupational Therapy | 283 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Primary Care Visits | 365 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Vision Therapy | 31 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neurosurgery | 156 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Neuro-optometry/Neuro-ophthalmology | 124 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Social Worker | 88 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Psychologist/Mental health | 120 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Vocational Counseling | 62 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Cornell Services Index | Psychiatrist | 101 Participants |
Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)
The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: This outcome will be assessed longitudinally via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3,6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.
Population: Total participants randomized
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 3 month | 1.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 6 month | 1.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 9 month | 1.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 12 month | 1.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 12 month | 1.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 3 month | 1.20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 9 month | 1.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) | 6 month | 1.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a
A measure that assesses engagement in roles and activities apart from those related to caregiving. Raw scores are converted to scale scores, with a range of 26.2 to 65.6, with the higher score indicating better outcome.
Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.
Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a | 51.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a | 50.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)
A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life.
Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.
Population: Total participants randomized
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 3 month | 67.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 6 month | 68.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 9 month | 68.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 12 month | 68.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 12 month | 65.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 3 month | 65.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 9 month | 66.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI) | 6 month | 65.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
RTP Satisfaction Survey
A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with RTP (intervention), measured through Likert-scaled and open-ended questions.
Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from both patient and caregiver participants (if applicable) randomized to the RTP group 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care (if they consented to complete the survey).
Population: The 16 patients and caregivers who jointly completed the survey are represented in both groups, however the data table shows data for the combined surveys only in the patient column, therefore the number of caregivers represented in the caregiver column is only 104.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | A lot | 44 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | Moderately | 33 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | Extremely | 63 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | A little bit | 14 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | NA/Not Answered | 11 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | A lot | 57 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | Not at all | 8 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | NA/Not Answered | 19 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | A little bit | 14 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | Extremely | 54 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | Moderately | 30 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | A lot | 40 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | A lot | 51 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | NA/Not Answered | 12 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | Extremely | 53 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | Not at all | 6 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | NA/Not Answered | 19 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | Not at all | 12 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | Not at all | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | Moderately | 29 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | A little bit | 4 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | A little bit | 12 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | Moderately | 10 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | A little bit | 13 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | A lot | 30 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | Moderately | 33 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | Extremely | 120 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | Extremely | 68 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | NA/Not Answered | 8 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | Not at all | 5 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | NA/Not Answered | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | Not at all | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | A little bit | 5 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | Moderately | 13 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | A lot | 24 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | Extremely | 57 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with resources connections after discharge | NA/Not Answered | 2 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | Not at all | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | A little bit | 5 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | Moderately | 15 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | A lot | 23 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | Extremely | 52 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injury | NA/Not Answered | 6 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | Not at all | 4 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | A little bit | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | Moderately | 11 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | A lot | 29 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | Extremely | 54 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injury | NA/Not Answered | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | Not at all | 4 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | A little bit | 7 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | Moderately | 21 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | A lot | 25 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | Extremely | 42 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | RTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to do | NA/Not Answered | 5 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | Not at all | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | A little bit | 0 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | Moderately | 3 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | A lot | 12 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | RTP Satisfaction Survey | It was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBI | Extremely | 83 Participants |
Satisfaction With Care
A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with health care received by the patient participant. Patients, caregivers, both, or another appropriate proxy could rate their satisfaction with different domain's of the patient's care on a 1-7 scale, where 1 = Very dissatisfied, 7 = Very satisfied, and 4 = Neutral. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction (better outcome).
Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. 6-month outcomes are reported.
Population: Participants with complete data for this measure at 6 months post-discharge.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Attend appointments | 6.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.45 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Connect with community resources/services | 5.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.83 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Get answers about healthcare | 5.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Receive help when it's needed | 5.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Get help coordinating healthcare | 5.69 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Receive help when it's needed | 5.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Get help coordinating healthcare | 5.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Attend appointments | 5.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.55 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Get answers about healthcare | 5.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Satisfaction With Care | Connect with community resources/services | 5.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12)
The SF-12 is a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and allows for 2 component scores to be determined: physical health and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.
Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12) | Physical Component | 51.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12) | Mental Component | 46.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12) | Physical Component | 50.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12) | Mental Component | 46.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance
The Reason for Assistance measure asks which category captures the reason the patient cannot be alone (if in the Need supervision or Need assistance category for Required Assistance).
Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.
Population: Caregivers who reported the patient in the Need supervision or Need assistance category for Required Assistance measure.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Cognition/Behavior | 39 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Physical function | 33 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Both | 82 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Other | 5 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Other | 4 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Cognition/Behavior | 42 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Both | 83 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance | Physical function | 32 Participants |
Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance
A measure developed by the study team to describe the use of caregivers for individuals with TBI. The Required Assistance portion of the measure asks how much oversight or supervision the patient needs on a daily basis, ranging from 1) Need someone in the room awake at all time to 12) Lives independently with minimal assistance. Responses were categorized into three levels with 1-8 equaling Need supervision, 9-10 equaling Need assistance, and 11-12 equaling Independent.
Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.
Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance | Need supervision | 121 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance | Need assistance | 39 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance | Independent | 67 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance | Need supervision | 120 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance | Need assistance | 40 Participants |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance | Independent | 72 Participants |
Zarit Burden Interview
12 item version addresses the concerns that our stakeholders feel are most important and that we feel are most relevant to our study interventions. The minimum and maximum values are 0 to 88, with 88 representing the most burden (worst outcome).
Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.
Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Discharge Plan | Zarit Burden Interview | 22.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Rehabilitation Transition Plan | Zarit Burden Interview | 22.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.3 |