Skip to content

Brain Injury Rehabilitation Improving the Transition Experience

Improving Transition From Acute to Post-Acute Care Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03422276
Acronym
BRITE
Enrollment
1555
Registered
2018-02-05
Start date
2018-02-13
Completion date
2022-11-10
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Transition, Rehabilitation Discharge

Brief summary

Each year, about 2.8 million people sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States, and at least 25 percent of these injuries are classified as moderate to severe. Nearly half of those hospitalized for TBI have long-term disability. Most have psychological, physical, social, or work-related problems, which often become chronic. By talking with patients and family members, we found that returning to daily activities and regaining quality of life are major concerns. Outcomes are affected by the type and severity of the TBI, but the type of treatment someone with TBI receives is also important. What resources are available, whether providers are experienced with the problems associated with TBI, and how much treatment is available can affect outcomes as well. Currently, inpatient rehabilitation professionals are told to give people with TBI information, reassurance, advice, and referral resources. Some promising ways of helping people with TBI include using telephone and other mobile devices to reach patients after they leave the hospital, to regularly assess their individual needs and help them coordinate their health care, and to provide the information and resources that they need. These new strategies may lead to earlier return to activities and improved quality of life. No studies have compared the standard approach to discharge care with an approach that uses telecare to provide information and care coordination after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation for TBI. The main goal of this project is to find out how improving the transition from the hospital to outpatient care can improve the lives of people with moderate to severe TBI and achieve better results that are important to patients with TBI, their families, and healthcare providers. In this study, patients with TBI who are discharged from inpatient rehabilitation at one of six national TBI Model Systems sites (University of Washington, Indiana University, Ohio State University, Mount Sinai Hospital, Moss Rehabilitation, and Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation) will be randomized (like the flip of a coin) to either the standard discharge plan or the standard discharge plan with additional telephone follow up from a TBI care manager for the first 6 months after discharge. The project team will compare patient and caregiver functioning and quality of life at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after hospital discharge in these two groups.

Detailed description

Screening The screening process involves a review of medical records by our research staff for patients with a diagnosis of TBI, or suspected TBI, (see inclusion/exclusion for further detail) who are admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation unit at the study sites. Recruitment Patient Participants: If a potential participant meets eligibility criteria based on medical record review, research staff will approach him/her on the inpatient rehabilitation unit to determine whether the patient is cognitively capable of providing consent by administering a measure of orientation/ emergence from PTA. If the patient is deemed oriented, the research staff will introduce the study using a talking points script, and if the potential participant is interested, provide him/her with a brochure and a consent form. Research staff will initiate the informed consent process if: a) the patient is deemed oriented per definition above, and b) the patient expresses interest in participating. Research staff will visit the patient on a subsequent day and re-administer the orientation test prior to consent if needed. If the patient is not deemed oriented as per the outline above, the patient is deemed not yet oriented and unable at that time to provide informed consent. Research staff may administer the orientation test multiple times to determine capacity to consent. Research staff may talk with a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) if one is willing and available to attempt to obtain their consent if a patient is not deemed oriented prior to discharge. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 900 patient participants. Caregiver Participants: Caregiver participants will be those individuals who will have primary care giving responsibility following rehabilitation care discharge of patients with moderate to severe TBI. Caregivers may be recruited while the patient is in the hospital or by telephone, if not available during hospitalization. Research staff may enroll more than one individual as a caregiver following subject enrollment should a different individual assume the role of caregiver at a later time point. The investigators plan to enroll a total of 607 caregiver participants. Basic Demographic Information: All Potential Patient Participants Basic demographic information including age, sex, and race will be collected via medical record review without consent from all patients including those who do not enroll to determine differences between enrolled patients participants and those who do not enroll. Consent For patient participants, the informed consent process will take place during the participants inpatient rehabilitation stay with our research staff while they are inpatients. Potential participants will be fully informed of all risks and benefits prior to giving their written informed consent and prior to enrollment in the study. Participants may take time to think about participating and render a decision in a subsequent visit. Potential participants will be asked to repeat back understanding of this material as necessary. Research staff will also review a HIPAA authorization form with the participant that permits research staff to collect data from his/her medical records regarding injury and medical history. Caregiver Participants: Caregiver participants may be initially recruited by telephone or in person. Caregivers will provide written consent if enrolled in person. All participants approached for possible enrollment in this study will be clearly informed that if they choose not to participate in this project, they and/or their loved one will still be able to receive any of the routine medical and rehabilitation services available to them. They will be informed that their participation is voluntary and that they may withdraw their consent and discontinue participation in the study at any time. Any new information developed during the course of the study that might affect a participant's understanding of the research and willingness to continue to participate will be brought to their attention by study staff. Baseline Assessment Contact Information Sheet Research staff will collect the following information from both caregiver and patient participants: (1) contact information; (2) best way to reach an individual if they have more than one line; best times/days to reach participant; and (3) names and contact information of people staff are allowed to contact if participant is lost to follow-up or otherwise cannot be contacted (i.e. collateral contacts). Baseline Information: Demographic and injury related data will be collected from the electronic medical record, and additional demographic and clinical history will be collected in interview format. A cognitive assessment focused on memory, concentration, and problem solving will be given. These data will be entered in de-identified form into the NDSC centralized database by research staff. Discharge Information: Research staff will collect information from a patient participant's medical record regarding the presence/absence of recommended and/or scheduled appointments to different medical disciplines/services. Specific information regarding the recommended/scheduled appointments (e.g. name, phone number, email address, date of scheduled appointment, etc.) of patient participants randomized to the rehabilitation transition phase (RTP) group will be stored locally in a database used by the TBI care managers for referential purposes. The investigators will collect information regarding the nature of the caregiver's relationship to the patient participant, as well as basic demographic information. These data will be entered in de-identified form into the NDSC centralized database by research staff. Randomization/ Post-Discharge Transition Phase After the patient participant has been discharged, s/he will be randomly assigned 1:1 into one of two study arms: Rehabilitation Discharge Plan (RDP) group or the Rehabilitation Transition Plan (RTP) group. The investigators will stratify randomization on study site and discharge destination (another facility vs. home/ community). Once randomization occurs, their random assignment will be communicated to the TBI Care Manager (TCM). The TCM will then send out a letter to the patient participant and caregiver (if applicable). RTP Process Variables Individual elements of the RTP will be measured as they are administered to each patient/ caregiver or other recipient in the form of a treatment note as captured in a secure database, incorporating documentation elements used in the field. Measures will include the clock time devoted to each contact, the recipient of each contact, total number of attempts/contacts, the type of need or issue discussed, and actions planned and implemented. Follow Up Data Collection 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months Post Hospital Discharge: Patient Participant The 3, 6, 9 and 12 month post-hospital discharge questionnaire will take approximately 45-60 minutes to complete, and will be completed by phone or in person. This questionnaire includes both the primary and secondary outcomes described below.

Interventions

OTHERRehabilitation Discharge Plan

CARF standards for discharge following an inpatient rehabilitation stay for a traumatic brain injury. This approach may include the following: 1. patient and family education about TBI, both general and individualized to each person's symptoms and level of function, as well as education on medications and symptoms to monitor following discharge; 2. written discharge care instructions, including recommended appointments with primary care, rehabilitation medicine and outpatient therapies, and medication list which are reviewed with the patient and family prior to discharge; and 3. a phone call from an inpatient care provider within a few days of discharge to address any immediate problems and ensure that equipment has arrived, medications are being taken, etc.

OTHERRehabilitation Transition Plan

Participants and their caregivers (if applicable) randomized to the Rehabilitation Transition Plan group will receive up to 12 scheduled contacts 6 months post-discharge from a TBI care manager familiar with the care and resource networks at the respective sites. The contacts will at minimum be by telephone, although a HIPAA-compliant video conferencing option will also be available. The content of these contacts will include: 1. Particularly in the first few calls, review of discharge plans and assistance and/or directive problem-solving around any obstacles to following discharge plans; 2. Assessment of unmet needs, developed into a standard checklist of areas of need that are relevant to TBI, culled from literature on need fulfillment in this population.

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
CollaboratorOTHER
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Ohio State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Craig Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This study uses masked outcome assessment, which means study researchers will make every effort to ensure that staff members who collect outcomes data from both patient and caregiver participants at 3-, 6-, 9- and 12 months are unaware of patient participants' treatment group allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hospitalized with a moderate-to-severe TBI defined by TBIMS and this study as damage to brain tissue caused by an external mechanical force as evidenced by medically documented loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) due to brain trauma or by objective neurological findings that can be reasonably attributed to TBI on physical examination or mental status examination. Potential participants must meet at least one of the following criteria to be considered experiencing a moderate-to-severe TBI: 1. PTA\>24 hours; 2. Trauma related intracranial neuroimaging abnormalities; 3. Loss of consciousness exceeding 30 minutes (unless due to sedation or intoxication); or 4. Glasgow Coma Scale in the emergency department of less than 13 (unless due to intubation, sedation, or intoxication). 2. English speaking (we will track non-enrollment due to other language to determine common languages and have consumer dissemination materials translated for more broad use if time and resources permit.); 3. At least 18 years old; 4. Will be discharged from inpatient rehabilitation to community (private residence, adult home, hotel, homeless) or facility (nursing home, subacute care i.e. skilled nursing facility); 5. Current admission to inpatient rehabilitation considered their first comprehensive rehabilitation experience, or extension thereof for most recent TBI (e.g. admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, discharged to acute care, then returns to inpatient rehabilitation to complete their initial stay); 6. Able to provide informed consent, or if unable to provide consent have family or legal guardian to provide informed consent for the patient. Inclusion Criteria- Caregiver Participants: 1. Individuals who will have primary care giving responsibility post rehabilitation care discharge of enrolled patient participants; 2. English speaking (we will track non-enrollment due to other language to determine common languages and have consumer dissemination materials translated for more broad use if time and resources permit.); 3. At least 18 years old; 4. Able to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life.
Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Zarit Burden InterviewThis outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.12 item version addresses the concerns that our stakeholders feel are most important and that we feel are most relevant to our study interventions. The minimum and maximum values are 0 to 88, with 88 representing the most burden (worst outcome).
Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12)This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.The SF-12 is a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and allows for 2 component scores to be determined: physical health and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8aThis outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.A measure that assesses engagement in roles and activities apart from those related to caregiving. Raw scores are converted to scale scores, with a range of 26.2 to 65.6, with the higher score indicating better outcome.
Time Spent Caregiving - Required AssistanceThis outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.A measure developed by the study team to describe the use of caregivers for individuals with TBI. The Required Assistance portion of the measure asks how much oversight or supervision the patient needs on a daily basis, ranging from 1) Need someone in the room awake at all time to 12) Lives independently with minimal assistance. Responses were categorized into three levels with 1-8 equaling Need supervision, 9-10 equaling Need assistance, and 11-12 equaling Independent.
Cornell Services IndexThis outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.A patient-reported instrument created to assess healthcare services utilization. This reports the number and percentage of individuals who attended at least one visit of a specialty during follow-up, regardless of whether they had been recommended and/or scheduled at discharge.
Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life.
Satisfaction With CareThis outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. 6-month outcomes are reported.A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with health care received by the patient participant. Patients, caregivers, both, or another appropriate proxy could rate their satisfaction with different domain's of the patient's care on a 1-7 scale, where 1 = Very dissatisfied, 7 = Very satisfied, and 4 = Neutral. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction (better outcome).
RTP Satisfaction SurveyThis outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from both patient and caregiver participants (if applicable) randomized to the RTP group 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care (if they consented to complete the survey).A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with RTP (intervention), measured through Likert-scaled and open-ended questions.
Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistanceThis outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.The Reason for Assistance measure asks which category captures the reason the patient cannot be alone (if in the Need supervision or Need assistance category for Required Assistance).
Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)This outcome will be assessed longitudinally via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3,6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Bakas Caregiving Outcomes ScaleThis outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.A 15-item measure, each with a 7-point scale that assesses change in social functioning, emotional well-being, and physical health related to caregiving. Item scores are transformed to 1-7, then summed to provide total scale scores ranging from 15 - 105, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patient participants were recruited from 6 IPR facilities starting in Feb 2018 through Aug 2021. Caregivers (CG) of enrolled patients were recruited from the first patient enrollment through the end of patient participation. The final CG enrolled in February 2022. Patients could have more than one CG enrolled in the study due to changes in primary caregiver responsibility. Only one CG completed each follow up (max N at any follow up 591), but a total of 611 CG were enrolled throughout the study.

Pre-assignment details

11 patients were enrolled but not randomized in the study for the following reasons: Determined to be ineligible, death, withdrew, and other. The majority (8) were determined to be ineligible. 8 caregivers were enrolled to patients that were not randomized. So a total of 19 of the 1555 enrolled patients and caregivers were not part of the randomized cohort.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rehabilitation Discharge Plan
Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) standards for discharge following an inpatient rehabilitation stay for a traumatic brain injury, including patient and family education, written discharge care instructions, and telephone follow up from a clinical provider. Rehabilitation Discharge Plan: CARF standards for discharge following an inpatient rehabilitation stay for a traumatic brain injury. This approach may include the following: 1. patient and family education about TBI, both general and individualized to each person's symptoms and level of function, as well as education on medications and symptoms to monitor following discharge; 2. written discharge care instructions, including recommended appointments with primary care, rehabilitation medicine and outpatient therapies, and medication list which are reviewed with the patient and family prior to discharge; and 3. a phone call from an inpatient care provider within a few days of discharge to address any immediate problems and ensure that equipment has arrived, medications are being taken, etc.
462
Rehabilitation Transition Plan
Approximately 12 scheduled contacts from a TBI care manager 6 months following discharge in addition to the CARF standards for discharge. Rehabilitation Transition Plan: Participants and their caregivers (if applicable) randomized to the Rehabilitation Transition Plan group will receive up to 12 scheduled contacts 6 months post-discharge from a TBI care manager familiar with the care and resource networks at the respective sites. The contacts will at minimum be by telephone, although a HIPAA-compliant video conferencing option will also be available. The content of these contacts will include: 1. Particularly in the first few calls, review of discharge plans and assistance and/or directive problem-solving around any obstacles to following discharge plans; 2. Assessment of unmet needs, developed into a standard checklist of areas of need that are relevant to TBI, culled from literature on need fulfillment in this population.
463
Rehabilitation Discharge Plan - Caregivers
Caregivers of patients randomized to the Rehabilitation Discharge Plan (RDP) group
309
Rehabilitation Transition Plan - Caregivers
Caregivers of patients randomized to the Rehabilitation Transition Plan (RTP) group
302
Total1,536

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath142131
Overall StudyDiscontinued, for caregiver, death of patient participant00817
Overall StudyDiscontinued, for caregiver, patient participant was determined to be ineligible0010
Overall StudyDiscontinued, ineligible4300
Overall StudyDiscontinued, no longer caregiver for patient participant00103
Overall StudyDiscontinued, researcher decided not in participant's best interest1010
Overall StudyIncarcerated prior to first follow-up0100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up158134
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21251416

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRehabilitation Discharge Plan - CaregiversRehabilitation Transition Plan - CaregiversTotalRehabilitation Transition PlanRehabilitation Discharge Plan
Age, Continuous
Caregivers
50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Age, Continuous
Patients
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
Alcohol use problem208 Participants97 Participants111 Participants
Cause of injury
Fall
314 Participants146 Participants168 Participants
Cause of injury
Other
38 Participants22 Participants16 Participants
Cause of injury
Vehicle (includes pedestrian/bike)
480 Participants248 Participants232 Participants
Cause of injury
Violence
81 Participants41 Participants40 Participants
Competitively employed, yes202 Participants203 Participants957 Participants284 Participants268 Participants
Country of birth, USA278 Participants260 Participants538 Participants
Discharge to facility, yes178 Participants89 Participants89 Participants
Earnings
30K to less than 60K
84 Participants70 Participants330 Participants89 Participants87 Participants
Earnings
60K or more
76 Participants85 Participants327 Participants86 Participants80 Participants
Earnings
Less than 30k
41 Participants54 Participants263 Participants84 Participants84 Participants
Earnings
None
0 Participants0 Participants322 Participants155 Participants167 Participants
Education Level
College or more
109 Participants119 Participants457 Participants128 Participants101 Participants
Education Level
HS Diploma or GED
85 Participants79 Participants477 Participants152 Participants161 Participants
Education Level
Less than High School
13 Participants11 Participants149 Participants59 Participants66 Participants
Education Level
Some College
93 Participants84 Participants421 Participants118 Participants126 Participants
English spoken at home, yes861 Participants428 Participants433 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
76 Participants29 Participants47 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
825 Participants423 Participants402 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ever attempted suicide, yes60 Participants35 Participants25 Participants
Ever had mental health treatment, yes248 Participants136 Participants112 Participants
Ever had psychiatric hospitalization, yes79 Participants40 Participants39 Participants
Ever served in military, yes115 Participants60 Participants55 Participants
Ever used illicit drugs, yes222 Participants120 Participants102 Participants
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Cognitive subscale at discharge23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
22.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor subscale at discharge63.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
64.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
63.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score
Mild (13-15)
286 Participants127 Participants159 Participants
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score
Moderate (9-12)
83 Participants42 Participants41 Participants
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score
Sedated/Intubated
354 Participants182 Participants172 Participants
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Severity Score
Severe (3-8)
120 Participants65 Participants55 Participants
Insurance type, yes
Medicaid
226 Participants118 Participants108 Participants
Insurance type, yes
Medicare
216 Participants98 Participants118 Participants
Insurance type, yes
Other, Workers Comp, Charity
97 Participants44 Participants53 Participants
Insurance type, yes
Private/self
379 Participants199 Participants180 Participants
Limitations prior to injury, yes431 Participants209 Participants222 Participants
Living alone at discharge, yes38 Participants15 Participants23 Participants
Living in private residence, yes302 Participants294 Participants596 Participants
Living in same household, yes195 Participants189 Participants384 Participants
Married/Partner, yes193 Participants194 Participants735 Participants189 Participants159 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Alone
23 Participants24 Participants47 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Child/Children
15 Participants27 Participants42 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Other relative(s)/Adult Children
23 Participants13 Participants36 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Parent(s)
16 Participants11 Participants27 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Roommate(s) or Friend(s)
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Siblings
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Significant Other
32 Participants27 Participants59 Participants
Person living with caregiver
Spouse
188 Participants191 Participants379 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
42 Participants44 Participants246 Participants79 Participants81 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Hispanic
24 Participants13 Participants123 Participants33 Participants53 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
16 Participants24 Participants99 Participants31 Participants28 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
221 Participants214 Participants1045 Participants314 Participants296 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
309 participants302 participants1536 participants463 participants462 participants
Rehab length of stay26 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24
26 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26
26 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23
Relationship to patient
Boyfriend, Girlfriend, Fiancé, Partner
23 Participants20 Participants43 Participants
Relationship to patient
Daughter or Son
48 Participants32 Participants80 Participants
Relationship to patient
Friend
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Relationship to patient
Other
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Relationship to patient
Other relative
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Relationship to patient
Parent
86 Participants89 Participants175 Participants
Relationship to patient
Sibling
19 Participants23 Participants42 Participants
Relationship to patient
Spouse
117 Participants114 Participants231 Participants
Residence zone of discharge
Rural
291 Participants152 Participants139 Participants
Residence zone of discharge
Urban/Suburban
615 Participants301 Participants314 Participants
Severity according to time in PTA
0 to 24h (mild)
143 Participants70 Participants73 Participants
Severity according to time in PTA
25h to 7 days (moderate)
90 Participants47 Participants43 Participants
Severity according to time in PTA
More than 7 days (severe)
603 Participants299 Participants304 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
218 Participants225 Participants691 Participants114 Participants134 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
91 Participants77 Participants845 Participants349 Participants328 Participants
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), yes116 Participants58 Participants58 Participants
Years (decimal) know the patient30.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
30.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
30.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
Years (decimal) lived in the same house19.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
18.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
18.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
14 / 46221 / 4633 / 2961 / 2951 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
107 / 462158 / 46310 / 29613 / 2950 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
127 / 462141 / 4634 / 2969 / 2950 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)

The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome.

Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.

Population: Individuals with complete data for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)1.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Rehabilitation Transition PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Comparison: It was calculated that 500 to 900 participants randomized in a 1:1 fashion between the two arms would have practically 100% power to detect an effect size of 0.5, and even a small sample size of 300 would have 80% power to detect a small effect size of 0.3 (800 to 900 would be 100% power).p-value: 0.44t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)

A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life.

Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.

Population: Participants with complete data for this measure. This measure could only be collected from the patient (no proxy data).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)68.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Rehabilitation Transition PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)65.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
p-value: 0.1t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale

A 15-item measure, each with a 7-point scale that assesses change in social functioning, emotional well-being, and physical health related to caregiving. Item scores are transformed to 1-7, then summed to provide total scale scores ranging from 15 - 105, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.

Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanBakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale60.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Rehabilitation Transition PlanBakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale60.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Secondary

Cornell Services Index

A patient-reported instrument created to assess healthcare services utilization. This reports the number and percentage of individuals who attended at least one visit of a specialty during follow-up, regardless of whether they had been recommended and/or scheduled at discharge.

Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.

Population: Individuals who had at least one follow-up interview.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexPhysical Therapy325 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexNeurosurgery162 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexNeuropsychology119 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexNeuro-optometry/Neuro-ophthalmology118 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexOccupational Therapy262 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexSocial Worker83 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexRehabilitation Medicine260 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexPsychologist/Mental health104 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexPrimary Care Visits347 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexVocational Counseling46 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexNeurology210 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexPsychiatrist88 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexSpeech Therapy247 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanCornell Services IndexVision Therapy32 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexSpeech Therapy261 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexNeuropsychology146 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexNeurology217 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexRehabilitation Medicine266 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexPhysical Therapy324 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexOccupational Therapy283 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexPrimary Care Visits365 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexVision Therapy31 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexNeurosurgery156 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexNeuro-optometry/Neuro-ophthalmology124 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexSocial Worker88 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexPsychologist/Mental health120 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexVocational Counseling62 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanCornell Services IndexPsychiatrist101 Participants
Secondary

Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)

The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17) assesses participation in usual roles and social activities. There are 17 items with 0-5 response scales. Those items are combined and averaged into three domain subscale scores that range from 0-5: Productivity (3 items), Social Relations (7 items), and Out and About (7 items). The Averaged Total score, used here, is calculated by averaging the three domain scores. Higher values represent a better outcome.

Time frame: This outcome will be assessed longitudinally via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3,6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.

Population: Total participants randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)3 month1.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)6 month1.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)9 month1.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)12 month1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Rehabilitation Transition PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)12 month1.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Rehabilitation Transition PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)3 month1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Rehabilitation Transition PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)9 month1.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Rehabilitation Transition PlanParticipation Assessment With Recombined Tools - Objective 17 (PART-O-17)6 month1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Secondary

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a

A measure that assesses engagement in roles and activities apart from those related to caregiving. Raw scores are converted to scale scores, with a range of 26.2 to 65.6, with the higher score indicating better outcome.

Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.

Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a51.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Rehabilitation Transition PlanPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a50.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Secondary

Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)

A patient-reported instrument specifically created to measure the patient's perception of their health-related quality of life following TBI. The QOLIBRI scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 0=worst possible quality of life and 100=best possible quality of life.

Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care.

Population: Total participants randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)3 month67.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)6 month68.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)9 month68.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)12 month68.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Rehabilitation Transition PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)12 month65.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Rehabilitation Transition PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)3 month65.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Rehabilitation Transition PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)9 month66.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Rehabilitation Transition PlanQuality of Life After Brain Injury Scale (QoLIBRI)6 month65.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Secondary

RTP Satisfaction Survey

A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with RTP (intervention), measured through Likert-scaled and open-ended questions.

Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from both patient and caregiver participants (if applicable) randomized to the RTP group 6 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care (if they consented to complete the survey).

Population: The 16 patients and caregivers who jointly completed the survey are represented in both groups, however the data table shows data for the combined surveys only in the patient column, therefore the number of caregivers represented in the caregiver column is only 104.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryA lot44 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryModerately33 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryExtremely63 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeA little bit14 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryNA/Not Answered11 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryA lot57 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doNot at all8 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeNA/Not Answered19 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doA little bit14 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryExtremely54 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doModerately30 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeA lot40 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doA lot51 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryNA/Not Answered12 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doExtremely53 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryNot at all6 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doNA/Not Answered19 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryNot at all12 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBINot at all3 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeModerately29 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIA little bit4 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryA little bit12 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIModerately10 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryA little bit13 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIA lot30 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryModerately33 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIExtremely120 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeExtremely68 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBINA/Not Answered8 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeNot at all5 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBINA/Not Answered3 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeNot at all3 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeA little bit5 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeModerately13 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeA lot24 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeExtremely57 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with resources connections after dischargeNA/Not Answered2 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryNot at all3 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryA little bit5 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryModerately15 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryA lot23 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryExtremely52 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with practical, day-to-day adjustment to life with a brain injuryNA/Not Answered6 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryNot at all4 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryA little bit3 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryModerately11 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryA lot29 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryExtremely54 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped with emotional adjustment to life with a brain injuryNA/Not Answered3 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doNot at all4 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doA little bit7 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doModerately21 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doA lot25 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doExtremely42 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyRTP helped accomplish the things you wanted to doNA/Not Answered5 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBINot at all3 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIA little bit0 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIModerately3 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIA lot12 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanRTP Satisfaction SurveyIt was valuable to talk with someone who understands TBIExtremely83 Participants
Secondary

Satisfaction With Care

A measure developed by the study team to assess satisfaction with health care received by the patient participant. Patients, caregivers, both, or another appropriate proxy could rate their satisfaction with different domain's of the patient's care on a 1-7 scale, where 1 = Very dissatisfied, 7 = Very satisfied, and 4 = Neutral. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction (better outcome).

Time frame: This outcome will be assessed via self-report instrument from the patient participant 6 and 12 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation care. 6-month outcomes are reported.

Population: Participants with complete data for this measure at 6 months post-discharge.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanSatisfaction With CareAttend appointments6.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanSatisfaction With CareConnect with community resources/services5.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanSatisfaction With CareGet answers about healthcare5.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanSatisfaction With CareReceive help when it's needed5.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanSatisfaction With CareGet help coordinating healthcare5.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Rehabilitation Transition PlanSatisfaction With CareReceive help when it's needed5.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Rehabilitation Transition PlanSatisfaction With CareGet help coordinating healthcare5.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Rehabilitation Transition PlanSatisfaction With CareAttend appointments5.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Rehabilitation Transition PlanSatisfaction With CareGet answers about healthcare5.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Rehabilitation Transition PlanSatisfaction With CareConnect with community resources/services5.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Secondary

Short Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12)

The SF-12 is a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and allows for 2 component scores to be determined: physical health and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.

Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.

Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanShort Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12)Physical Component51.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanShort Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12)Mental Component46.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Rehabilitation Transition PlanShort Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12)Physical Component50.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Rehabilitation Transition PlanShort Form 12-Item Measure (SF-12)Mental Component46.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
Secondary

Time Spent Caregiving - Reason for Assistance

The Reason for Assistance measure asks which category captures the reason the patient cannot be alone (if in the Need supervision or Need assistance category for Required Assistance).

Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.

Population: Caregivers who reported the patient in the Need supervision or Need assistance category for Required Assistance measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistanceCognition/Behavior39 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistancePhysical function33 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistanceBoth82 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistanceOther5 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistanceOther4 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistanceCognition/Behavior42 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistanceBoth83 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Reason for AssistancePhysical function32 Participants
Secondary

Time Spent Caregiving - Required Assistance

A measure developed by the study team to describe the use of caregivers for individuals with TBI. The Required Assistance portion of the measure asks how much oversight or supervision the patient needs on a daily basis, ranging from 1) Need someone in the room awake at all time to 12) Lives independently with minimal assistance. Responses were categorized into three levels with 1-8 equaling Need supervision, 9-10 equaling Need assistance, and 11-12 equaling Independent.

Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.

Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Required AssistanceNeed supervision121 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Required AssistanceNeed assistance39 Participants
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Required AssistanceIndependent67 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Required AssistanceNeed supervision120 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Required AssistanceNeed assistance40 Participants
Rehabilitation Transition PlanTime Spent Caregiving - Required AssistanceIndependent72 Participants
Secondary

Zarit Burden Interview

12 item version addresses the concerns that our stakeholders feel are most important and that we feel are most relevant to our study interventions. The minimum and maximum values are 0 to 88, with 88 representing the most burden (worst outcome).

Time frame: This outcome was assessed via self-report instrument from the caregiver participant at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the patient is discharged from inpatient rehabilitation care. This is reporting the 6-month outcomes.

Population: Caregiver participants with complete data for the measure at the 6 month follow-up timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation Discharge PlanZarit Burden Interview22.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Rehabilitation Transition PlanZarit Burden Interview22.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026