Skip to content

Non-invasive Stimulation of Brain Networks and Cognition in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia

A Non-invasive, Multimodal Approach to Restore Functional Networks and Cognition in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03422250
Acronym
NetCogBs
Enrollment
45
Registered
2018-02-05
Start date
2015-06-08
Completion date
2018-11-03
Last updated
2021-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, Behavioral Variant

Brief summary

This pilot study aims to test clinical and connectivity changes following non-invasive stimulation of disease-specific networks in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Brain network stimulation will be carried out with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Target networks will be the default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN). Twenty AD and 20 bvFTD patients will be recruited and assessed with a comprehensive clinical, behavioral and cognitive battery, and 3 Tesla MRI scan (including resting-state functional MRI, arterial spin labeling, diffusion tensor imaging, structural MRI) at three time-points: baseline, after tDCS, and after 6 months. Patients will be randomized to 2 arms: anodal stimulation of the disease-specific network (DMN in AD, SN in bvFTD) or cathodal stimulation of the anti-correlated network (SN in AD, DMN in bvFTD). The intervention will consist of 10 tDCS sessions over two weeks. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples will be collected at baseline for biomarker's assessment; blood samples will be collected at each time-point to assess changes in peripheral inflammatory markers. Blood and CSF collection will be optional. A sample of 20 elderly controls will be included for baseline comparisons.

Interventions

DEVICEtranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

10 daily 25-minutes tDCS sessions over two weeks.

Sponsors

IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of AD or bvFTD according to current clinical criteria (Albert et al., 2011; Rascovsky et al., 2011) * Ability to provide written informed consent * Availability of a collateral source

Exclusion criteria

* Moderate/severe dementia * Presence of any medical or psychiatric illness that could interfere in completing assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)CDR - Clinical Dementia Rating score The clinical dementia rating (CDR) is a clinical global rating scale administered to both the participant and the caregiver, assessing 6 domains of participant function: memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Each domain is based on a 5-point scale ranging from no impairment=0, questionable impairment=0.5, mild impairment=1, moderate impairment=2 to severe impairment=3. The global CDR score is computed via a memory-weighted averaging algorithm of the six domain scores and ranges from 0 to 5. The CDR-sum of boxes (CDR-SB) is the sum of the individual domain scores and ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate more clinical impairment. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement on the scale.
Change in Behavioral Symptom Severity (NPI)Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is a behavioral scale administered to the caregiver assessing 12 dimensions: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor activity, nighttime behaviors, and appetite/eating. Each dimension has multiple screening questions relating to symptoms. If the answer to the screening questions is Yes, the dimensional-score is the product of frequency (1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) and severity (1=Mild to 3=Severe) of symptoms. Dimensional-scores are summed (from 0 to 144). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral disturbances. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement on the scale.
Change in Behavioral Symptom Severity (FBI)Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)The Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) is a 24-item inventory designed to assess behavior and personality changes via caregiver. Item-level scores range from 0=none, 1=mild/occasional, 2=moderate, 3=severe/most of the time. Item-scores are summed (from 0 to 72). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral/personality disturbances. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement on the scale.
Change in Functional ConnectivityBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)Default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) mean functional connectivity is assessed on resting state functional MRI. Functional connectivity is standardized to Z scores and thresholded at Z\>2. Higher values denote greater functional connectivity. A positive change at post tDCS compared to baseline represents an increase in resting-state functional connectivity.
Change in Cerebral Blood FlowBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)Default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) mean cerebral blood flow is assessed on arterial spin labeling. Cerebral blood flow is computed by averaging values across the DMN and SN regions of interest. Cerebral blood flow is a measure of brain perfusion, higher values denoting higher perfusion. A positive change at post tDCS compared to baseline represents an increase in perfusion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Structural Connectivity: FABaseline, post tDCS (week 3)Fractional anisotropy (FA) is assessed on diffusion weighted imaging. FA values are averaged in default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) regions of interest. FA values denote the directionality of water diffusivity, ranging from 0 (isotropic diffusion) to 1 (anisotropic diffusion). Higher values denote higher directionality and connectivity. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in the measure.
Change in Cognition: MemoryBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)The composite memory score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores of 5 memory tests: immediate and delayed auditory verbal learning test recall, Rey-Osterrieth complex figure recall, story recall, digit span backward and forward tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better memory performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in memory.
Change in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)Mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AxD), and radial diffusivity (RaD) are assessed on diffusion weighted imaging. MD, AxD, RaD values are averaged in default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) regions of interest. MD, AxD, and RaD measure water diffusion and are expressed in mm\^2/s (starting from 0 with no maximum value; scaled at x10\^-3). Higher values denote higher diffusion and lower connectivity. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in the measure.
Change in Cognition: LanguageBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)The composite language score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores of 2 language tests: verbal fluency and token tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better language performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in language.
Change in Cognition: Executive FunctionBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)The composite executive function score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores of 2 executive functions tests: trail making test part A and part B tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls and inverted. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better executive function performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in executive functions.
Change in Cognition: Visuospatial FunctionBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)The visuospatial function score consists of the Z-standardized scores for the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure copy test. Scores are normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better visuospatial performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in visuospatial functions.
Change in Cognition: Emotion RecognitionBaseline, post tDCS (week 3)The composite emotion recognition score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores for 2 emotion recognition tests: reading the Mind in the Eyes and 60 Ekman faces tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better emotion recognition performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in emotion recognition.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMN
AD: anodal tDCS of the default mode (DMN) network with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): 10 daily 25-minutes tDCS sessions over two weeks. Stimulation target: inferior parietal cortex
10
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SN
AD: cathodal tDCS of the salience network (SN) with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): 10 daily 25-minutes tDCS sessions over two weeks. Stimulation target: prefrontal cortex
10
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SN
bvFTD: anodal tDCS of the salience network (SN) with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): 10 daily 25-minutes tDCS sessions over two weeks. Stimulation target: prefrontal cortex
10
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMN
bvFTD: cathodal tDCS of the default mode network (DMN) with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): 10 daily 25-minutes tDCS sessions over two weeks. Stimulation target: inferior parietal cortex
10
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Follow-upAdverse Event0001
Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject0001
InterventionAdverse Event0101
Interventionsafety (psoriasis, cortical vascular lesions on MRI)1020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicbvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNTotalbvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNAD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNAD: Anodal tDCS of the DMN
Age, Continuous69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants40 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
10 Participants40 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
5 Participants18 Participants3 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
5 Participants22 Participants7 Participants6 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 110 / 120 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 116 / 115 / 125 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 121 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Behavioral Symptom Severity (FBI)

The Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) is a 24-item inventory designed to assess behavior and personality changes via caregiver. Item-level scores range from 0=none, 1=mild/occasional, 2=moderate, 3=severe/most of the time. Item-scores are summed (from 0 to 72). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral/personality disturbances. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement on the scale.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Behavioral Symptom Severity (FBI)-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Behavioral Symptom Severity (FBI)-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Primary

Change in Behavioral Symptom Severity (NPI)

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) is a behavioral scale administered to the caregiver assessing 12 dimensions: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor activity, nighttime behaviors, and appetite/eating. Each dimension has multiple screening questions relating to symptoms. If the answer to the screening questions is Yes, the dimensional-score is the product of frequency (1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) and severity (1=Mild to 3=Severe) of symptoms. Dimensional-scores are summed (from 0 to 144). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral disturbances. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement on the scale.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Behavioral Symptom Severity (NPI)-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Behavioral Symptom Severity (NPI)-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Behavioral Symptom Severity (NPI)-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Behavioral Symptom Severity (NPI)-6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Primary

Change in Cerebral Blood Flow

Default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) mean cerebral blood flow is assessed on arterial spin labeling. Cerebral blood flow is computed by averaging values across the DMN and SN regions of interest. Cerebral blood flow is a measure of brain perfusion, higher values denoting higher perfusion. A positive change at post tDCS compared to baseline represents an increase in perfusion.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowSN4.37 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 7
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowDMN4.87 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 8.92
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowSN-1.92 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 12.3
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowDMN-0.06 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 9.46
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowDMN0.56 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 7.72
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowSN2.34 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 4.84
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowDMN3.08 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 3.45
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cerebral Blood FlowSN1.41 ml/100g/minStandard Deviation 4.09
Primary

Change in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)

CDR - Clinical Dementia Rating score The clinical dementia rating (CDR) is a clinical global rating scale administered to both the participant and the caregiver, assessing 6 domains of participant function: memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Each domain is based on a 5-point scale ranging from no impairment=0, questionable impairment=0.5, mild impairment=1, moderate impairment=2 to severe impairment=3. The global CDR score is computed via a memory-weighted averaging algorithm of the six domain scores and ranges from 0 to 5. The CDR-sum of boxes (CDR-SB) is the sum of the individual domain scores and ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate more clinical impairment. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement on the scale.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR global-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR sum of boxes0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR sum of boxes0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR global0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR global0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR sum of boxes-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR global0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Clinical Disease Severity (CDR)CDR sum of boxes0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Change in Functional Connectivity

Default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) mean functional connectivity is assessed on resting state functional MRI. Functional connectivity is standardized to Z scores and thresholded at Z\>2. Higher values denote greater functional connectivity. A positive change at post tDCS compared to baseline represents an increase in resting-state functional connectivity.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Functional ConnectivityDMN0.08 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.13
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Functional ConnectivitySN-0.06 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.15
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Functional ConnectivitySN0.05 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.2
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Functional ConnectivityDMN-0.09 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.11
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Functional ConnectivityDMN-0.02 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.23
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Functional ConnectivitySN0.08 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.18
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Functional ConnectivityDMN-0.04 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.15
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Functional ConnectivitySN0.02 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Change in Cognition: Emotion Recognition

The composite emotion recognition score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores for 2 emotion recognition tests: reading the Mind in the Eyes and 60 Ekman faces tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better emotion recognition performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in emotion recognition.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Emotion Recognition0.1 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.5
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Emotion Recognition0.1 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Emotion Recognition0.3 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.2
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Emotion Recognition0.1 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Change in Cognition: Executive Function

The composite executive function score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores of 2 executive functions tests: trail making test part A and part B tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls and inverted. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better executive function performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in executive functions.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Executive Function0.3 z scoreStandard Deviation 2.9
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Executive Function-0.3 z scoreStandard Deviation 2.4
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Executive Function0.7 z scoreStandard Deviation 2.3
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Executive Function-0.7 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Change in Cognition: Language

The composite language score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores of 2 language tests: verbal fluency and token tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better language performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in language.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Language0.7 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Language0.4 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Language0.7 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Language0.4 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change in Cognition: Memory

The composite memory score consists of the averaged Z-standardized scores of 5 memory tests: immediate and delayed auditory verbal learning test recall, Rey-Osterrieth complex figure recall, story recall, digit span backward and forward tests. Each test score is normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better memory performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in memory.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Memory0.3 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.2
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Memory0.3 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.3
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Memory0.1 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.3
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Memory0.2 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change in Cognition: Visuospatial Function

The visuospatial function score consists of the Z-standardized scores for the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure copy test. Scores are normalized to an independent dataset of healthy controls. Z-scores have no minimum/maximum values. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean and is considered normal. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than the mean. Higher values denote better visuospatial performance. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in visuospatial functions.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Visuospatial Function1.2 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.1
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Visuospatial Function0.0 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.6
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Cognition: Visuospatial Function0.1 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.8
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Cognition: Visuospatial Function0.4 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Change in Structural Connectivity: FA

Fractional anisotropy (FA) is assessed on diffusion weighted imaging. FA values are averaged in default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) regions of interest. FA values denote the directionality of water diffusivity, ranging from 0 (isotropic diffusion) to 1 (anisotropic diffusion). Higher values denote higher directionality and connectivity. Positive changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in the measure.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: FADMN FA0.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.007
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: FASN FA0.003 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.009
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: FASN FA-0.002 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.011
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: FADMN FA-0.003 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.006
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: FADMN FA-0.002 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.008
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: FASN FA-0.002 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.009
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: FADMN FA0.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.008
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: FASN FA0.001 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.011
Secondary

Change in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaD

Mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AxD), and radial diffusivity (RaD) are assessed on diffusion weighted imaging. MD, AxD, RaD values are averaged in default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) regions of interest. MD, AxD, and RaD measure water diffusion and are expressed in mm\^2/s (starting from 0 with no maximum value; scaled at x10\^-3). Higher values denote higher diffusion and lower connectivity. Negative changes at post tDCS compared to baseline represent an improvement in the measure.

Time frame: Baseline, post tDCS (week 3)

Population: Modified intention-to-treat sample (participants completing intervention)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN MD-0.003 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.017
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN MD-0.004 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.016
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN AxD-0.004 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.017
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN AxD-0.004 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.017
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN RaD-0.002 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.017
AD: Anodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN RaD-0.005 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.017
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN RaD0.000 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.015
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN AxD-0.008 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.029
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN MD-0.001 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.019
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN AxD-0.006 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.024
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN MD-0.002 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.017
AD: Cathodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN RaD0.001 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.017
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN MD0.010 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.009
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN AxD0.009 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.014
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN AxD0.014 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.018
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN RaD0.008 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.009
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN RaD0.007 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.009
bvFTD: Anodal tDCS of the SNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN MD0.007 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.008
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN RaD0.006 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.009
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN RaD0.005 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.011
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN MD0.007 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.008
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDSN AxD0.010 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.012
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN MD0.007 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.008
bvFTD: Cathodal tDCS of the DMNChange in Structural Connectivity: MD, AxD, RaDDMN AxD0.008 x10^-3 mm^2/sStandard Deviation 0.011

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026