Skip to content

Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.

Are we Supporting the Apex During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A NSQIP Analysis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03421067
Enrollment
3458
Registered
2018-02-05
Start date
2018-02-27
Completion date
2019-02-14
Last updated
2019-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Brief summary

This is a retrospective descriptive study using the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program® (ACS NSQIP®) data to determine whether gynecologic surgeons are already meeting the recently recommended best practice of supporting the vaginal apex at time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Detailed description

The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the United States is estimated to be between 40-50% with an anticipated increase over the next several decades. Approximately 300,000 women undergo surgeries to repair POP in the United States every year. Following pelvic reconstructive surgery, recurrence rates of symptomatic prolapse range between 6-30%. Our understanding of pelvic anatomy and its support has been significantly improved over recent decades, with many researchers reporting on details and mechanics previously not understood. In November 2017, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released a new practice bulletin outlining the current standard of care for the treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse. In this bulletin, they state that a hysterectomy alone is not adequate treatment for POP, and further that any woman having a hysterectomy for POP should undergo a concurrent apical suspension procedure as a standard of care. The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for the indication of POP having concurrent apical suspension among the population whose cases are reported within the NSQIP database, and who underwent hysterectomy between 2015 and 2017.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

TriHealth Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Underwent hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse, between 2015 and 2017

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years old * Pelvic Organ Prolapse was not recorded in their postoperative diagnoses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
proportion of patients having concurrent apical suspension performedprocedure (at time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse)proportion of patients who had concurrent apical support procedures performed

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026