Skip to content

Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy Efficiency in Masticatory Muscles Pain Management

The Evaluation of EMG-biofeedback Therapy Efficiency in Management of Masticatory Muscles Pain

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03421028
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-02-05
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2021-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Pain, Feedback, Psychological, Craniomandibular Disorders, Temporomandibular Disorder, Sleep

Brief summary

This study evaluates beneficial effects of biofeedback therapy in reducing pain and increased tension of muscles occurring in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). During the study Electromyography Biofeedback (EMG-Biofeedback)- assisted training lowering muscle tension will be used. The patients will undergo 4 or 8 meetings of EMG-Biofeedback - assisted training Than the patients will be reevaluated after 6 and 12 weeks.

Detailed description

1. The Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate beneficial effects of biofeedback therapy in reducing pain, increased tension of masticatory muscles occurring in patients with myogenous TMD and if the therapy influences psychological and sleep parameters. Also to verify if the effect of the therapy persists in time. 2. Patients: 1. Experimental group 1 - patients diagnosed with myalgia subjected to 4 EMG-Biofeedback trainings. The group will include approximately 20 adults. 2. Experimental group 2 - patients diagnosed with myalgia subjected to 8 EMG-Biofeedback trainings. The group will include approximately 20 adults. 3. Control group - patients diagnosed with myalgia subjected to physiotherapy (manual therapy), stabilization splint usage and counseling (20 adults). 3. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with masticatory muscles myalgia will be included in this study. All participants will be evaluated in accordance to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Intensity of pain in the masticatory muscles will be defined using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed with an dolorimeter and noticed on DC/TMD pain drawing diagram. Each of the qualified patients will also undergo the electromyography of temporal and masseter muscles. All participants will fill in questionnaires (Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8). Patients qualified to the experimental groups will be divided in to 2 subgroups composed of 20 participants each. Experimental group 1 will undergo a cycle of 4 meetings (1 per week) of 20 minute EMG-Biofeedback- assisted training decreasing the masseter and temporalis muscle tension. 10 minutes of training for each group of muscle. Experimental group 2 will undergo a cycle of 8 meetings (1 per week) of 20 minute EMG-Biofeedback- assisted training decreasing the masseter and temporalis muscle tension. 10 minutes of training for each group of muscle. Postcycle examination: After completing the cycle, patients from the study group and control group will be reevaluated. All participants will be evaluated in accordance to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Intensity of pain in the masticatory muscles will be defined using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed with an dolorimeter and noticed on DC/TMD pain drawing diagram. Each of the qualified patients will also undergo the electromyography of temporal and masseter muscles. All participants will fill in questionnaires (Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8). The postcycle examination will take place after last planned training and during follow-ups - 6 and 12 weeks after completion of EMG-Biofeedback therapy.

Interventions

EMG-Biofeedback- assisted training is a method in which electrodes situated on the surface of the skin detect small voltage changes which arise from the working muscles (in this case masseter and temporalis muscles). The voltage is transformed into a visual or sound time-variable signal which gives the patient feedback as he willingly tries to change the muscle tension (in this case to lower the excessive masseter tension)

OTHERClassic treatment for myogenous TMD

Combination of physiotherapy (manual therapy), stabilization occlusal splint usage and counseling

Sponsors

Wroclaw Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of myalgia in accordance to Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders * full dentition or single tooth loss * age between 18 and 70

Exclusion criteria

* age under 18 * age over 70 * terminal general diseases * severe mental disorders * severe neurological disorders * intake of drugs affecting muscle function * edentulism or destruction of dentition * alcoholism * drug addiction * history of severe trauma in the head and neck region * severe pathology of temporomandibular joints * congenital or acquired craniofacial deformity * patients suffering from neuropathic pain * patients with craniofacial inflammation * patients undergoing orthodontic treatment * pregnancy * significant postural defect

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Experimental group 1before the treatment, after 4 weeks of trainingThis effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pre- and post- biofeedback therapy. A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in Experimental group 2before the treatment, after 8 weeks of trainingThis effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pre- and post- biofeedback therapy. A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by pressure pain threshold in Experimental group 1before the treatment, after 4 weeks of trainingThis effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold pre- and post- biofeedback therapy. Pressure pain threshold will be measured with dolorimeter.
The effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms measured by pressure pain threshold in Experimental group 2before the treatment, after 8 weeks of trainingThis effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold pre- and post- biofeedback therapy. Pressure pain threshold will be measured with dolorimeter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on sleep quality and its persistence in time measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatmentThis effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Each participant will fill in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups. The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores mean better sleep quality.
Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms in comparison to standard treatment measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)after treatment and up to 12 weeks laterThis effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) between studied and control group. The results will be compared after treatment and during follow-ups. A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI).before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatmentThis effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Beck Anxiety Inventory. Each participant will fill in Beck Anxiety Inventory pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups. The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the 21 items. Total score for all 21 symptoms that can range between 0 and 63 points. A total score of 0 - 7 is interpreted as a Minimal level of anxiety; 8 - 15 as Mild; 16 - 25 as Moderate, and; 26 - 63 as Severe.
Persistence in time of EMG biofeedback therapy effects on pain symptoms measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)after treatment and up to 12 weeks laterThis effect will be assessed by comparing Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pre- and post- biofeedback therapy. A numerical rating scale (NRS) requires the patient to rate their pain on a scale 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
Persistence in time of EMG biofeedback therapy effects on pain symptoms measured by pressure pain thresholdafter treatment and up to 12 weeks laterThis effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold pre- and post- biofeedback therapy. Pressure pain threshold will be measured with dolorimeter.
Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback therapy on pain symptoms in comparison to standard treatment measured by pressure pain thresholdafter treatment and up to 12 weeks laterThis effect will be assessed by comparing pressure pain threshold measured with dolorimeter between studied and control group. The results will be compared after treatment and during follow-ups.
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatmentThis effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) . Each participant will fill in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups. PHQ-9 total score for the nine items ranges from 0 to 27.Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively.
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10)before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatmentThis effect will be assessed by comparing the results of Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10). Each participant will fill in Perceived Stress Scale -10 pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups. Scores are obtained by reversing the scores on the four positive items, e.g., 0=4, 1=3, 2=2, etc. and then summing across all 10 items. Items 4,5, 7, and 8 are the positively stated items. It can range from 0 to 40. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress,14-26 would be considered moderate stress, 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress.
Effect of EMG biofeedback therapy on psychological parameters and its persistence in time measured by Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8).before the treatment and up to 12 weeks after completion of the treatmentThis effect will be assessed by comparing the results Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8). Each participant will fill in Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8) pre- post therapy and during the follow-ups. SSS-8 total score ranges from 0 to 32 points, where 0-3 points means no to minimal severity, 4-7 points - low severity, 8-11 points - medium severity, 12-15 points - high severity, 16-32 points - very high severity.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactWojciech Florjański, D.M.D.P.H.D.
wojciech.florjanski@umed.wroc.pl+48783602042
Backup ContactMieszko Więckiewicz, D.M.D.Ph.D.
m.wieckiewicz@onet.pl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026