Skip to content

Study of BGB-A317 in Participants With Previously Treated Unresectable HCC

A Phase 2, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of the Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody BGB-A317 in Patients With Previously Treated Hepatocellular Unresectable Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03419897
Enrollment
249
Registered
2018-02-05
Start date
2018-04-09
Completion date
2022-07-06
Last updated
2024-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Keywords

Advanced liver cancer, RATIONALE-208

Brief summary

This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody BGB-A317 in participants with previously treated hepatocellular unresectable carcinoma.

Interventions

DRUGTislelizumab

Administered intravenously

Sponsors

BeiGene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Histologically confirmed HCC 2. Participants with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C, or BCLC stage B not amenable to locoregional therapy or relapsed after locoregional therapy, and not amenable to a curative treatment approach 3. Has received at least 1 line of systemic therapy for unresectable HCC 4. Has at least 1 measurable lesion as defined per RECIST v1.1 5. Child-Pugh score A 6. Easter Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 1 7. Adequate organ function Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Known fibrolamellar HCC, sarcomatoid HCC, or mixed cholangiocarcinoma and HCC histology 2. Prior therapies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 3. Has known brain or leptomeningeal metastasis 4. Tumor thrombus involving main trunk of portal vein or inferior vena cava 5. Loco-regional therapy to the liver within 4 weeks before enrollment 6. Medical history of interstitial lung disease, non-infectious pneumonitis or uncontrolled systemic diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, or acute lung diseases 7. Has received: 1. Within 28 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) of the first study drug administration: any chemotherapy, immunotherapy (eg, interleukin, interferon, thymoxin) or any investigational therapies 2. Within 14 days of the first study drug administration: sorafenib, regorafenib, or any Chinese herbal medicine or Chinese patent medicines used to control cancer 8. Active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse 9. Participant with any condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (\> 10 mg daily of prednisone or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medication within 14 days before study drug administration NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)From date of first dose to primary analysis data cut-off date of 30-June-2021 (up to approximately 3 years and 3 months)ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as the best overall response, as determined by an IRC using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by IRCFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1
DOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by IRCFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months); Months 12 and 24 reportedDOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for progression or death at 12 and 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.
DOR Assessed by InvestigatorFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1
DOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by InvestigatorFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months); Months 12 and 24 reportedDOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for progression or death at 12 and 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by IRCFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1
PFS Assessed by InvestigatorFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1
Overall Survival (OS)From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)OS is defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of death due to any cause
ORR Assessed by InvestigatorFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR and PR as the best overall response, as determined by investigator assessment using RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions.
DCR Assessed by InvestigatorFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)DCR is defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response is CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Assessed by IRCFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)CBR is defined as the percentage of participants who have CR, PR, or SD of ≥ 24 weeks in duration as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1
CBR Assessed by InvestigatorFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)CBR is defined as the percentage of participants who have CR, PR, or SD of ≥ 24 weeks in duration as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1
European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1 and Cycle 12 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS. The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health StatusBaseline to Cycle 6 Day 1 and Cycle 12 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients. It includes global health status and quality of life questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
EORTC QLQ - Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Questions (HCC18): Index ScoresBaseline to Cycle 6 Day 1 and Cycle 12 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ HCC18 Index Scores. The EORTC QLQ HCC18 is a specific questionnaire module that assesses quality of life of cancer patients related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug; up to approximately 4 years and 3 monthsNumber of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), which includes laboratory tests, physical exams, electrocardiogram results and vital signs
Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed by IRCFrom date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)DCR is defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response is CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1

Countries

China, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 73 study centers in Mainland China, Taiwan, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, Poland, and the United Kingdom.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tislelizumab
Tislelizumab 200 mg administered intravenously once every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or the time point at which the participant was no longer benefiting from therapy, as assessed by the investigator, whichever occurred first
249
Total249

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath180
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudySponsor Decision61
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTislelizumab
Age, Continuous60.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.54
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score
0 = Fully Active
129 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score
1 = Restricted Activity
120 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
123 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
78 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
217 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
180 / 249
other
Total, other adverse events
226 / 249
serious
Total, serious adverse events
94 / 249

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as the best overall response, as determined by an IRC using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions.

Time frame: From date of first dose to primary analysis data cut-off date of 30-June-2021 (up to approximately 3 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabObjective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)12.9 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Tislelizumab compared with historical ORR rate of 7%p-value: 0.0001Binomial exact test
Secondary

CBR Assessed by Investigator

CBR is defined as the percentage of participants who have CR, PR, or SD of ≥ 24 weeks in duration as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabCBR Assessed by Investigator30.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Assessed by IRC

CBR is defined as the percentage of participants who have CR, PR, or SD of ≥ 24 weeks in duration as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Assessed by IRC22.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

DCR Assessed by Investigator

DCR is defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response is CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabDCR Assessed by Investigator59.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed by IRC

DCR is defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall response is CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabDisease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed by IRC53.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

DOR Assessed by Investigator

DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TislelizumabDOR Assessed by Investigator21.4 Months
Secondary

DOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by Investigator

DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for progression or death at 12 and 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months); Months 12 and 24 reported

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabDOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by Investigator12 Months68.1 Percentage of participants
TislelizumabDOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by Investigator24 Months47.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

DOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by IRC

DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for progression or death at 12 and 24 months with 95% confidence intervals estimated using Greenwood's formula.

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months); Months 12 and 24 reported

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabDOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by IRC12 Months76.9 Percentage of participants
TislelizumabDOR Event-Free Rate Assessed by IRC24 Months65.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by IRC

DOR is defined as the time from the date that response criteria are first met to the date that progressive disease is objectively documented or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TislelizumabDuration of Response (DOR) Assessed by IRCNA Months
Secondary

EORTC QLQ - Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Questions (HCC18): Index Scores

Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ HCC18 Index Scores. The EORTC QLQ HCC18 is a specific questionnaire module that assesses quality of life of cancer patients related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1 and Cycle 12 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug; Overall number of participants analyzed refers to number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number analyzed refers to participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TislelizumabEORTC QLQ - Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Questions (HCC18): Index ScoresBaseline13.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.33
TislelizumabEORTC QLQ - Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Questions (HCC18): Index ScoresChange at Cycle 61.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.77
TislelizumabEORTC QLQ - Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Questions (HCC18): Index ScoresChange at Cycle 120.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.27
Secondary

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status

Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients. It includes global health status and quality of life questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1 and Cycle 12 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug; Overall number of participants analyzed refers to number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number analyzed refers to participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TislelizumabEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health StatusBaseline71.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.37
TislelizumabEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health StatusChange at Cycle 6-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
TislelizumabEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health StatusChange at Cycle 121.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.63
Secondary

European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS)

Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS. The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' A higher score indicates better health outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1 and Cycle 12 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug; Overall number of participants analyzed refers to number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number analyzed refers to participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TislelizumabEuropean Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Baseline75.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.36
TislelizumabEuropean Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Change at Cycle 62.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.57
TislelizumabEuropean Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS)Change at Cycle 124.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.85
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), which includes laboratory tests, physical exams, electrocardiogram results and vital signs

Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug; up to approximately 4 years and 3 months

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with a serious TEAE94 Participants
TislelizumabNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsParticipants with at least 1 TEAE236 Participants
Secondary

ORR Assessed by Investigator

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR and PR as the best overall response, as determined by investigator assessment using RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions.

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TislelizumabORR Assessed by Investigator14.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of death due to any cause

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TislelizumabOverall Survival (OS)13.2 Months
Secondary

PFS Assessed by Investigator

PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TislelizumabPFS Assessed by Investigator2.8 Months
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by IRC

PFS is defined as the time from first dose until first documentation of progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by the IRC using RECIST v1.1

Time frame: From date of first dose to end of study (up to approximately 4 years and 3 months)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TislelizumabProgression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by IRC2.7 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026