Skip to content

Personalised HTO Versus Generic HTO Virtual Clinical Trial

Personalised Subject Specific HTO Versus Generic HTO Virtual Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03419598
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-02-05
Start date
2017-01-03
Completion date
2019-06-28
Last updated
2020-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

virtual clinical trial, high tibial osteotomy, 3D, computer simulation, finite element analysis, medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis

Brief summary

High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is an alternative to knee replacement in suitable patients with early knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is particularly suited to patients with single compart disease who otherwise would be suitable for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). OA of the knee is very common and increasing driven by the ageing of the population. The current limitations of HTO are related to the difficulty of achieving the desired correction due to a challenging surgical technique and soft tissue irritation due to the use of generic stabilisation plates. This study will examine the safety equivalence of a new patient specific HTO process which has patient specific 3D printed plates, i.e. personalised HTO plates, with the existing most commonly used HTO procedure using the Tomofix generic HTO plate. Importantly this study will be undertaken as a Virtual Trial, existing anonymised 3D imaging data will be used to create the virtual patient cohort. This cohort will receive both procedures, which for this type of procedure is only possible in a virtual scenario. The main question to be addressed is: Is the personalised HTO procedure as safe as the most commonly used existing generic HTO procedure?. In this context safety concerns the mechanical loads placed upon the tibia and the support plate. The interventions will all be made on computer models, the 3D imaging data will be used to create the intact (un-operated) models of the subject tibias. Each model will then be virtually operated upon, with both the personalised and generic HTO procedures. The models will then be loaded with physiological loads experienced during function and the mechanical states compared.

Detailed description

Ethical approval was obtained to use CT scans of 30 patients with moderate to severe knee arthritis (REC reference: 17/HRA/0033, Royal Devon & Exeter National Health Service \[NHS\], UK). The CT data will be used to generate the 3D geometry of each patient's proximal tibia. The osteotomy correction angle required for each patient such that the altered mechanical axis will pass through a point 62.5% of the distance from medial to lateral tibial plateau. Virtual HTO surgery will be performed on each patient to alter the mechanical axis of the knee by creating an opening wedge osteotomy. After the virtual surgeries are performed, each virtual patient will be duplicated. One copy will have the osteotomy stabilised using a Generic plate and the other using a Personalised plate, thus forming the two arms of the trial. For each participant in each arm finite element (FE) models will be created, and loads applied simulating walking, sit to stand and squatting. Four healings stages will be considered, stage 1 being immediately post-operation (this will not be modelled), stage 2 representing 2 weeks post-operation, stage 3 representing 6 weeks and stage 4 representing 12 weeks. The mechanical loads in the plates, and around the screw locations in the bone, will be established by solving these finite element models.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpening wedge high tibial osteotomy

Realignment of knee by creating an opening wedge osteotomy in the upper part of the tibia. Since this is a virtual trial, the virtual patients were duplicated and enrolled into both arms

DEVICEPersonalised subject specific custom HTO plate

Subject specific custom plate for stabilizing an open wedge HTO

DEVICEGeneric HTO plate

Generic plate for stabilizing an open wedge HTO

Sponsors

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Bath
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Appropriate existing CT data of lower limb. * Male or Female, aged 18 years or above. * Diagnosed with moderate to severe OA of the knee.

Exclusion criteria

* Abnormal anatomy of tibia or presence of pathology other than OA, e.g. bone tumour. * Previous knee or osteotomy surgery. * Presence of metal-work

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical Stress in Plate During Gait6 weeks simulated post-operationMechanical stress (Von Mises) calculated for functional loading using finite element analysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical Strain in Bone Around Screws During Gait6 weeks simulated post-operationMechanical strain calculated for functional loading using finite element analysis, note strain is dimensionless and hence has no units

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The virtual patients were created based on CT data sets obtained for 30 patients with knee osteoarthritis. The virtual patients were duplicated, and then enrolled into both arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO): Realignment of knee by creating an opening wedge osteotomy in the upper part of the tibia Cohort duplicated into 2 copies. Copy A. Stabilised by Personalised HTO plate. Copy B. Stabilised by Generic HTO plate.
28
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPoor quality CT scans could not be adequately segmented to create virtual patient tibial geometry2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
18 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Age, Continuous67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Height (m)1.686 metres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.124
Kellgren & Lawrence OA Grade2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
Weight (kg)90.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Mechanical Stress in Plate During Gait

Mechanical stress (Von Mises) calculated for functional loading using finite element analysis

Time frame: 6 weeks simulated post-operation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalised HTOMechanical Stress in Plate During Gait108.3 MPaStandard Error 3.81
Generic HTOMechanical Stress in Plate During Gait90.6 MPaStandard Error 3.56
Secondary

Mechanical Strain in Bone Around Screws During Gait

Mechanical strain calculated for functional loading using finite element analysis, note strain is dimensionless and hence has no units

Time frame: 6 weeks simulated post-operation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalised HTOMechanical Strain in Bone Around Screws During Gait0.011 unitlessStandard Error 0.00056
Generic HTOMechanical Strain in Bone Around Screws During Gait0.011 unitlessStandard Error 0.00065

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026