Skip to content

Functional Outcome After Treatment for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Functional Outcome After Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) vs Oncological Treatment for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03418909
Enrollment
44
Registered
2018-02-01
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2023-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Papilloma Virus, Oropharynx Cancer, Pain, Quality of Life, Saliva Altered, Swallowing Disorder

Brief summary

To investigate the treatment related effects of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or oncological treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with a 1-year follow up.

Detailed description

Patients are enrolled prospectively at the department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. All eligible patients with histologically verified squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx regardless of treatment option (as long as the intent is curative) can be included. Outcome measures are assessed at baseline and repeated 3 and 12 months after treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPrimary Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS)

In the absence of severe mobidity patients with early stage disease (T1-2, N1, M0) were offered TORS, as an alternative to the standard of care (radiotherapy).

As the standard of care radiotherapy was offered to all of the patients. Patients that qualified for both TORS and radiotherapy were free to choose between the two.

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

TORS group: 1. WHO performance status 0-2 2. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx 3. TNM: T1-2, N0-1 (without of evidence of extra capsular extent), M0. 4. No previous head and neck cancer 5. Absence of factors that inhibit the patient from participate in all or parts of the study e.g. geographical, mental, cognitive or other. 6. Signed written consent. 7. Cancer eligible for surgery in the absence of significant trismus. Oncological group: 1. WHO performance status 0-2 2. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx 3. Qualified for curative intended oncological treatment 4. Signed written consent

Exclusion criteria

TORS group: 1. Serious co-morbidity 2. Distant metastasis 3. Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region. 4. Concurrent treatment eller investigations for another cancer, except carcinoma in situ. Oncological group: 1. Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region. 2. Concurrent treatment eller investigations for another cancer, except carcinoma in situ. 3. Presence of factors that inhibit the patient from participate in all or parts of the study e.g. geographical, mental, cognitive or other. 4. Presence of facors that inhibit the patient from completing the treatment. 5. Previous head and neck cancer 6. Distant metastasis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Altered salivatory function3 and 12 months follow upMeasured as change in flow rate or composition compared to baseline measurements performed prior to treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in swallowing function (FEES)3 and 12 months as well as 3 years after treatmentAssessed using fiber endoscopic evaluation of swallowing function (FEES). Evaluated as change from baseline.
Change to quality of life scores (MDADI)3 and 12 months as well as 3 years after treatmentAssessed using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire. Evaluated as change from baseline.
Changes in swallowing function (MBSS)3 and 12 months as well as 3 years after treatmentAssessed using modified barium swallowing studies (MBSS). Evaluated as change from baseline.
Change to quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-H&N35)3 and 12 months as well as 3 years after treatmentAssessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire. Evaluated as change from baseline.
Treatment related painFor as long as the patient needs analgesics or up to three monthsAssessed using a pain diary based on a 10 point visual analog scale (VAS). 0 being no pain and 10 the most severe pain. Registrered in increments of 1 (i.e. 3,5 is not an accepted score whereas 3 or 4 are).
Change to quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30)3 and 12 months as well as 3 years after treatmentAssessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Evaluated as change from baseline.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026