Skip to content

Hyperpolarized Xenon MRI for Assessment of Pulmonary Function in Lung Resection

Evaluation of Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI as Compared to 133Xe Scintigraphy for the Assessment of Pulmonary Function in Patients Being Evaluated for Possible Lung Resection Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03417687
Enrollment
38
Registered
2018-01-31
Start date
2018-08-17
Completion date
2020-03-10
Last updated
2022-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Surgical Procedures

Brief summary

This study compares the equivalence of hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI as compared to 133Xe scintigraphy for the evaluation of pulmonary function in patients being evaluated for lung resection.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, cross-over Phase 3 study evaluating hyperpolarized 129Xe gas MRI as compared to 133Xe scintigraphy for the evaluation of pulmonary function. This study will enroll subjects being evaluated for possible lung resection surgery (i.e. segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy). Subjects will have both a 129Xe MRI and 133Xe scintigraphy image. The vast differences in technique for obtaining hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI as compared to 133Xe scintigraphy make it impossible to blind study procedures. However, all image interpretation will be performed by personnel blinded to the subject's medical history and all study assessments.

Interventions

Evaluation of pulmonary function

DRUG133 Xe scintigraphy

Evaluation of pulmonary function

Sponsors

Polarean, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Open label crossover study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female subjects ≥18 years of age. 2. Subject is being evaluated for possible lung resection (e.g., segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy). 3. Subject is able to undergo MRI imaging and able to fit in the MRI coil. 4. Subject is willing and able to comply with all study procedures. 5. Subject must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form (ICF) prior to any study specific assessments or procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1. Baseline blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) \<90% at rest. For patients requiring routine supplemental oxygen, SpO2 measurements should be taken with the patient's normal oxygen supplementation. 2. Female subjects of childbearing potential with a positive serum pregnancy test at screening, or who are not taking (or not willing to take) acceptable birth control measures through the Follow-up Period. Adequate birth control methods include with a monogamous partner who was sterilized more than 6 months prior to screening, or measures with a Pearl index of \<1 used consistently and correctly (including intrauterine devices, or implantable, injectable, oral, or transdermal contraceptives). Women are not considered to be of childbearing potential if they meet at least 1 of the following 2 criteria as documented by the Investigator: * They have had a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy at a minimum of 1 menstrual cycle prior to signing the ICF; or * They are post-menopausal: for women ≥55 years of age, defined as ≥1 year since their last menstrual period, or for women \<55 years of age, defined as ≥1 year since their last menstrual period and have a follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the laboratory's normal range for post-menopausal phase. 3. Women who are lactating and insist on breast feeding. 4. Subjects who have received any other investigational therapy within 4 weeks prior to Screening. 5. Subjects who require anesthesia or heavy sedation to undergo MRI testing. Mild sedation could be acceptable (i.e. a low dose oral acting anxiolytic medication such as alprazolam) as long as, in the opinion of the investigator, the subject meets Inclusion Criteria #4 and #5.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predicted Percentage of Remaining Pulmonary Function48 hoursPredicted percentage of remaining pulmonary function is a pre-specified section of lung were to be removed. Investigators indicated which portions of lung were likely to be resected. Remaining percentage of pulmonary function was determined by subtracting the percentage of pulmonary function contributed by the planned zone of resection from the total pulmonary function using a standard 6-zone image analysis of the lung. The difference between predicted percentage of remaining pulmonary function was calculated by subtracting the value derived from the 133Xe scintigraphy image from the value derived from the 129Xe MRI image (e.g. 129Xe - 133Xe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Left Lung Zone.48 hoursThe fraction of total ventilation contributed by the lower left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Left Lung Zone.48 hoursThe fraction of total ventilation contributed by the upper left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Left Lung Zone.48 hoursThe fraction of total ventilation contributed by the middle left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Predicted Versus Measured FEV13 monthsThe difference between the scan-predicted post-operative FEV1 and the measured post-operative FEV1
Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Right Lung Zone.48 hoursThe fraction of total ventilation contributed by the middle right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Right Lung Zone.48 hoursThe fraction of total ventilation contributed by the lower right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.
Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Right Lung Zone.48 hoursThe fraction of total ventilation contributed by the upper right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
129Xe Before 133Xe
Subjects will undergo hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI first, followed by 133Xe scintigraphy 129Xe MRI: Evaluation of pulmonary function 133 Xe scintigraphy: Evaluation of pulmonary function
14
133Xe Before 129Xe
Subjects will undergo 133Xe scintigraphy first, followed by hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI 129Xe MRI: Evaluation of pulmonary function 133 Xe scintigraphy: Evaluation of pulmonary function
20
Total34

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic129Xe Before 133XeTotal133Xe Before 129Xe
Age, Continuous58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants34 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants27 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants34 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants23 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 143 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 140 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Predicted Percentage of Remaining Pulmonary Function

Predicted percentage of remaining pulmonary function is a pre-specified section of lung were to be removed. Investigators indicated which portions of lung were likely to be resected. Remaining percentage of pulmonary function was determined by subtracting the percentage of pulmonary function contributed by the planned zone of resection from the total pulmonary function using a standard 6-zone image analysis of the lung. The difference between predicted percentage of remaining pulmonary function was calculated by subtracting the value derived from the 133Xe scintigraphy image from the value derived from the 129Xe MRI image (e.g. 129Xe - 133Xe).

Time frame: 48 hours

Population: The Efficacy Analysis Set is the group of subjects who had both a 129Xe MRI scan and a 133Xe scintigraphy scan, and for whom both scans met quality control criteria for analysis (as defined in the Independent Review Charter).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIPredicted Percentage of Remaining Pulmonary Function73.4 percentage of remaining functionStandard Deviation 13
133XePredicted Percentage of Remaining Pulmonary Function71.9 percentage of remaining functionStandard Deviation 12.1
Comparison: The primary efficacy analysis tested the mean difference in the predicted percentage of remaining pulmonary function as measured by 129Xe MRI relative to the value as measured by 133Xe scintigraphy (reference standard) if a pre-defined section of lung were resected.95% CI: [-0.75, 3.6]
Secondary

Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Left Lung Zone.

The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the lower left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Left Lung Zone.16.08 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 4.43
133XeMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Left Lung Zone.12.37 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 3.6
95% CI: [2.12, 5.29]
Secondary

Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Right Lung Zone.

The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the lower right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Right Lung Zone.16.39 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 4.18
133XeMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Lower Right Lung Zone.18.16 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 3.62
95% CI: [-3.192, -0.335]
Secondary

Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Left Lung Zone.

The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the middle left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Left Lung Zone.22.27 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 3.71
133XeMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Left Lung Zone.20.92 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 2.88
95% CI: [0.184, 2.505]
Secondary

Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Right Lung Zone.

The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the middle right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Right Lung Zone.23.44 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 3.07
133XeMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Middle Right Lung Zone.26.16 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 3.8
95% CI: [-4.096, -1.345]
Secondary

Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Left Lung Zone.

The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the upper left lung zone on 6-zone analysis.

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Left Lung Zone.10.67 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 2.11
133XeMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Left Lung Zone.10.28 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 2.72
95% CI: [-0.476, 1.26]
Secondary

Measured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Right Lung Zone.

The fraction of total ventilation contributed by the upper right lung zone on 6-zone analysis.

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Right Lung Zone.11.16 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 2.97
133XeMeasured Percentage of Total Ventilation Contributed by the Upper Right Lung Zone.12.12 percentage of total functionStandard Deviation 2.56
95% CI: [-2.101, 0.181]
Secondary

Predicted Versus Measured FEV1

The difference between the scan-predicted post-operative FEV1 and the measured post-operative FEV1

Time frame: 3 months

Population: This analysis set of all subjects that met the criteria for inclusion in the efficacy analysis set and had a post-operative FEV1 (spirometry) value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
129Xe MRIPredicted Versus Measured FEV1-0.65 litersStandard Deviation 0.6
133XePredicted Versus Measured FEV1-0.65 litersStandard Deviation 0.66

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026