Skip to content

Lutronic PicoPlus Exploratory Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the Lutronic PicoPlus for the Treatment of Dematological Conditions Such as Unwanted Tattoos and Benign Pigmented Lesions

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03415685
Enrollment
39
Registered
2018-01-30
Start date
2017-10-12
Completion date
2018-10-03
Last updated
2023-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Pigmented Lesion, Melasma, Tattoo; Pigmentation

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the use of the Lutronic PicoPlus for treatment of dermatological conditions such as unwanted tattoos and benign pigmented lesions.

Detailed description

This pilot clinical trial will evaluate the capability of the Lutronic PicoPlus technology to remove unwanted tattoos and benign pigmented lesions. This trial is designed as a multi-center exploratory, open-label clinical trial comparing each subject's condition before and after treatment. Subjects meeting all entrance criteria will be assigned to Group A for treatment of unwanted tattoos and Group B for treatment of unwanted benign pigmented lesions, melasma, or other skin conditions such as skin rejuvenation. Subjects in each treatment group will receive a series of treatments, e.g., 2-5, and will be asked to complete 1 and 3 month follow-up visit(s) following each treatment to assess treatment efficacy and safety. At investigators' discretion, additional follow-up visits, e.g., at 6 months following treatment, may take place to observe the time course of reactions after treatment and/or assess efficacy. Outcome measures include clinician grading and subject satisfaction post-treatment. Pre-treatment study photos will be obtained at baseline; post-treatment study photos will be obtained at each post-treatment follow-up visit.

Interventions

DEVICEPicoPlus laser system

Laser treatment using specific pulse durations and wavelengths for selective pigment photothermolysis.

Sponsors

LUTRONIC Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Subjects will be assigned to one of two treatments group depending on the dermatologic condition to be treated.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female * Adults between age 18 and 60 years old * Group A: Fitzpatrick skin type I - VI for unwanted tattoos and Group B: Fitzpatrick Skin Types I - IV for benign pigmented lesions and other conditions * Unwanted tattoo that contains single or multi-color ink, and * Wiling to cover tattoos with a bandage or clothing; and/or have very limited sun exposure and use an approved sunscreen of SPF 50 or higher on the treated area starting 2 to 4 weeks before the treatment * Ability to read, understand, and sign the Informed Consent Form * Willing to have digital photographs taken of the treatment area and agree to use of photographs for presentation, educational or marketing purposes. * Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures in the areas to be treated * Willing and able to comply with all study participation requirements including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

* If receiving treatment for unwanted tattoo: double tattoos (tattoo over tattoo), history of allergic reactions to pigments following tattooing, local anesthetics or topical antibiotics * If receiving treatment for benign pigmented lesions including melasma: history of use of a lightening medication (hydroquinone, tranexamic acid), isotretinoid (or retinoid), or light-sensitive medication in the last 6 months * Known cardiovascular disease or cardiac surgery that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with study treatments * Previous interventions or treatment with another device in the target area within 6 months of enrollment or during the study * Pregnant or lactating or planning pregnancy before end of study * Presence of an active systemic, local skin disease, medication or condition that may affect wound healing or interfere with participation or treatment to the active area. * Active or recurrent cancer of current chemotherapy or radiation therapy * History of seizure disorders due to light * History of vitiligo, eczema, or psoriasis * History of connective tissue disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma * History of pigmentary disorders, particularly tendency for hyper- or hypo-pigmentation * History of disease stimulated by heat, such as recurrent herpes simplex and/or herpes zoster (shingles) in the treatment area, unless treatment is conducted following a prophylactic regimen * History of keloid scarring, hypertrophic scarring or of abnormal wound healing. * History of immunosuppression/immune deficiency disorders or currently using immunosuppressive medications. * History of seizure disorders due to light. * Suffering from coagulation disorders or taking prescription anticoagulation medications * History of keloid scarring, hypertrophic scarring or of abnormal wound healing Any use of medication that is known to increase sensitivity to light according to Investigator's discretion * Excessive or recent significant tan in areas to be treated or unable/unlikely to refrain from tanning during the study * Current smoker or history of smoking within 3 months of study participation * Systemic use of corticosteroid or isotretinoin within 6 months of study participation * Anytime in life, having have used gold therapy (gold salts) for disorders such as rheumatologic disease or lupus * Any physical or mental condition including alcohol or drug abuse that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with subject's suitability for inclusion in study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator's Global Assessment of ImprovementUp to 6 Months following final study treatmentOverall aesthetic improvement based on completion of the Physician's Global Assessment of Improvement Scale. Physician evaluators will review study photos post-final treatment, and rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation observed in the subject's treated area using the following definitions: 3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement1 month, 3 Months, 6 Months (Group A Only) post final treatmentOverall aesthetic improvement based on completion of the Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement Scale. Subjects will be asked review study photos post-final treatment, and rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation observed in the subject's treated area using the following definitions: 3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)
Subject Satisfaction1 month, 3 Months, 6 Months (Group A Only) post final treatmentFollowing the final study treatment, subjects will be asked to rate their level of satisfaction with the laser treatment outcome and the overall laser treatment procedure, using the Subject Satisfaction Assessment Scale and the following definitions: 2 = Extremely Satisfied 1 = Satisfied 0 = Neutral (-1) = Unsatisfied (-2) = Extremely Unsatisfied

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blinded Reviewer's Global Assessment of Improvement3-month (Group B), 6 months (Group A) Post Final treatmentThree blinded experienced, non-treating clinicians will independently evaluate pre- and post-treatment photos of each subject, presented randomly. Each reviewer will be asked to determine the temporal order (before and after) of each photo pair, and then rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation in the post-treatment photo using the following scale: 3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)
Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI)3 Months (Group B), 6 Months (Group A) post final treatmentThree blinded experienced, non-treating clinicians will independently evaluate pre- and post-treatment photos of each subject, presented randomly, using the MASI. Each of four regions (forehead, right malar region, left malar region and chin) will be assessed based on three variables: percentage of the total area involved (A), darkness (D), and homogeneity (H).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were assigned a group depending on the condition that was to be treated as part of their participation in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.
Subjects receiving PicoPlus laser system treatment for unwanted tattoos. PicoPlus laser system: Laser treatment using specific pulse durations and wavelengths for selective pigment photothermolysis.
11
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological Conditions
Subjects receiving PicoPlus laser system treatment for unwanted benign pigmented lesions, melasma or other dermatological conditions such as skin rejuvenation. PicoPlus laser system: Laser treatment using specific pulse durations and wavelengths for selective pigment photothermolysis.
28
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsTotal
Age, Continuous37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
43.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
38.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants15 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants28 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 1111 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Investigator's Global Assessment of Improvement

Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of the Physician's Global Assessment of Improvement Scale. Physician evaluators will review study photos post-final treatment, and rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation observed in the subject's treated area using the following definitions: 3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)

Time frame: Up to 6 Months following final study treatment

Population: \# of subjects who returned for FU assessment prior to study termination

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Investigator's Global Assessment of Improvement3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%)1 Participants
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Investigator's Global Assessment of Improvement2 = Significant clearing (50-74%)2 Participants
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Investigator's Global Assessment of Improvement1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%)3 Participants
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Investigator's Global Assessment of Improvement0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)0 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsInvestigator's Global Assessment of Improvement0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)0 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsInvestigator's Global Assessment of Improvement3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%)6 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsInvestigator's Global Assessment of Improvement1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%)2 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsInvestigator's Global Assessment of Improvement2 = Significant clearing (50-74%)0 Participants
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction

Following the final study treatment, subjects will be asked to rate their level of satisfaction with the laser treatment outcome and the overall laser treatment procedure, using the Subject Satisfaction Assessment Scale and the following definitions: 2 = Extremely Satisfied 1 = Satisfied 0 = Neutral (-1) = Unsatisfied (-2) = Extremely Unsatisfied

Time frame: 1 month, 3 Months, 6 Months (Group A Only) post final treatment

Population: Data cannot be reported as satisfaction data was not collected at the time of patient visits.

Secondary

Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement

Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of the Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement Scale. Subjects will be asked review study photos post-final treatment, and rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation observed in the subject's treated area using the following definitions: 3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)

Time frame: 1 month, 3 Months, 6 Months (Group A Only) post final treatment

Population: A subset of subjects (6 in Group A, 9 in Group B) returned for a 1-month follow-up prior to termination of the study with results reported in the corresponding table.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement2 = Significant clearing (50-74%)3 Participants
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%)0 Participants
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%)3 Participants
Group A: PicoPlus for Unwanted Tattoos.Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)0 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsSubject's Global Assessment of Improvement0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)0 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsSubject's Global Assessment of Improvement1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%)0 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsSubject's Global Assessment of Improvement3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%)6 Participants
Group B: PicoPlus for Other Dermatological ConditionsSubject's Global Assessment of Improvement2 = Significant clearing (50-74%)3 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Blinded Reviewer's Global Assessment of Improvement

Three blinded experienced, non-treating clinicians will independently evaluate pre- and post-treatment photos of each subject, presented randomly. Each reviewer will be asked to determine the temporal order (before and after) of each photo pair, and then rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation in the post-treatment photo using the following scale: 3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%)

Time frame: 3-month (Group B), 6 months (Group A) Post Final treatment

Population: Due to study termination a blinded review was not completed for the subject images in the study and thus there is no data to report.

Other Pre-specified

Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI)

Three blinded experienced, non-treating clinicians will independently evaluate pre- and post-treatment photos of each subject, presented randomly, using the MASI. Each of four regions (forehead, right malar region, left malar region and chin) will be assessed based on three variables: percentage of the total area involved (A), darkness (D), and homogeneity (H).

Time frame: 3 Months (Group B), 6 Months (Group A) post final treatment

Population: MASI scoring was not completed for participants in the study as the study was terminated and Blinded Reviewers did not evaluate the photos.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026