Skip to content

Validity of a Home Respiratory Polygraphy for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Validity and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Home Respiratory Polygraphy for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03415633
Acronym
APNiA
Enrollment
251
Registered
2018-01-30
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2018-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Keywords

Home Respiratory Polygraphy, Standard Polysomnography, Validity, Cost-effectiveness

Brief summary

To assess the diagnostic validity and cost-effectiveness of a APNiA device, a home respiratory polygraphy (HRP).

Detailed description

To assess the diagnostic validity and cost-effectiveness of a APNiA device, a home respiratory polygraphy (HRP), performed at home compared with the standard polysomnography (PSG) in adults with clinically suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). METHODOLOGY: DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, multicenter, and crossover trial. The study will include 240 adults, both sexes, with clinical suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MEASUREMENTS: To all patients with clinical suspected OSA and referred to the sleep units, the following questionnaires and measurements will be performed: a) clinical history; b) Anthropometric variables: weight, height, body mass index, neck circumference and percentile; c)Epworth sleepiness scale; OSA questionnaire, quality of life and clinical questionnaires and comorbidity; d) PSG in the sleep laboratory; e) HRP at home; f) Cost-effectiveness variables. ANALYSIS: Data from HRP and from full PSG will be compared as follows: 1) Agreement of results according to the different apnea-hypopnea index by using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve; 2) The concordance of the diagnosis and treatment decisions when using clinical findings and data from PSG or HRP at home; 3) All data will be analyzed independently; 4) A cost-effectiveness analysis of the different diagnostic and therapeutic procedures will be performed.

Interventions

OTHERHome Respiratory Polygraphy (APNIA)

Randomizing to start with home respiratory polygraphy (APNIA)

Randomizing to start with Standard Polysomnography (PSG)

Sponsors

BTI Biotechnology Institute S.L
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria BIO-ARABA
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Universitario Araba
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women over 18 years to 75 years old, with clinical suspicion of OSA * Written informed consent signed

Exclusion criteria

* Psycho-Physical inability to perform the study at home * Presence of insomnia or depressive syndrome * Patient with malformation syndromes, Down syndrome and neuromuscular diseases * Cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or respiratory disease exacerbated. * Previous Positive continuous pressure (CPAP ) treatment or surgery for OSA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI)baselineTo assess the diagnostic validity of a home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) compared with the standard polysomnography (PSG) in adults with clinically suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), based on the results of the Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epworth Sleepiness Scalebaseline and at 6 monthThe Epworth Sleepiness Scale (the sum of 8 items score,0-3) can range from 0 to 24. Scores of 11-24 represent increasing levels of excessive daytime sleepiness.
STOP-BANG Sleep apnea questionnairebaseline and at 6 monthSleep Apnea Questionnaire. High STOP-Bang score indicates a high probability of obstructive sleep apnea.
Berlin questionnairebaseline and at 6 monthThe questionnaire consists of 3 categories related to the risk of having sleep apnea. Patients can be classified into High Risk or Low Risk based on their responses to the individual items and their overall scores in the symptom categories. High Risk: if there are 2 or more categories where the score is positive. Low Risk: if there is only 1 or no categories where the score is positive.
Therapeutic decision6 monthThe concordance of the diagnosis and treatment decision when using clinical findings and data from standard polysomnography (PSG) or home respiratory polygraphy (HRP).
Blood pressurebaseline and at 6 monthBlood pressure measurements: systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure
Anthropometric variables (Body mass index)baseline and at 6 monthBody mass index
Quality of life (EuroQOL test)baseline and at 6 monthEvaluate by EuroQOL test, is a standardised measure of health status. Description of the state of health in five dimensions (mobility, self-car, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression), each o wich is defined with three levels of severity, as measured by a Likert scale type (no problems, some problems and many problems or inability to activity).
Cost-effectiveness analysis6 monthCost-efficacy evaluation

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026