Skip to content

REACH Implicit Bias Training Project

Development and Pilot Testing of an Implicit Bias Training Intervention for Providers to Advance Equity in Healthcare

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03415308
Enrollment
114
Registered
2018-01-30
Start date
2018-04-18
Completion date
2022-06-01
Last updated
2024-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bias, Racial, Communication, Relation, Doctor Patient

Keywords

Implicit Bias, Healthcare Equity

Brief summary

The overall goal and theme of the Duke Center for Research to Advance Equity in Healthcare is to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health through interventions that affect the clinical encounter. To achieve this goal, there is an urgent need for interventions that address implicit bias in healthcare. Implicit bias training is widely used to raise self-awareness and provide self-management tools. The overall objective is to test the hypothesis that implicit bias training for healthcare providers will reduce racial and ethnic disparities in patient- centered care. The proposed project will lay the groundwork for testing that hypothesis by using patient focus groups to garner a deeper understanding of perceptions of implicit bias in the clinical encounter; provider and health system stakeholder semi-structured interviews to inform refinement of the existing implicit bias training at Duke; and perform a pilot study of implicit bias training for providers. At the conclusion of this study, the investigators will have the necessary preliminary data to propose a definitive trial to determine the impact of an implicit bias training intervention for providers on racial and ethnic disparities in patient-centered care. This research will ultimately lead to the delivery of equitable, evidence-based, patient-centered care for all.

Detailed description

Despite substantial improvements in the overall health of our nation, racial and ethnic disparities in health and healthcare remain ubiquitous. Disparities are apparent after controlling for access to care, insurance, income, patient preferences, and clinical need, suggesting that providers and health systems are important contributors to racial disparities in healthcare. In its landmark report, Unequal Treatment, the Institute of Medicine concluded that providers contribute to disparities through the effects of implicit bias. Implicit bias occurs when thoughts and feelings outside of conscious awareness and control affect judgment and/or behavior. It is closely related to stereotyping, but not necessarily associated with explicit bias (i.e., prejudice). It leads to involuntary blind spots in virtually all of us. Implicit racial bias in providers is associated with Blacks (compared to Whites) experiencing lower patient-centered communication, worse doctor-patient relationships, lower confidence in the doctor, and poorer health outcomes. Therefore, to address health disparities, there is an urgent need for interventions that address implicit bias in healthcare. Across society, implicit bias training is increasingly used in public service, business and healthcare settings to raise self-awareness and provide self-management tools for avoiding actions based on implicit bias. While such interventions are well-conceived and intuitively attractive, they have not been rigorously tested. In order to make optimal use and insure sustained support for such training, its effectiveness must be rigorously demonstrated. The overall objective is to test the hypothesis that implicit bias training for healthcare providers will reduce racial/ethnic disparities in patient-centered care. Before investigators can definitively test this hypothesis, additional groundwork must be done. This project will provide the preliminary evidence necessary to ultimately evaluate an implicit bias training intervention in a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial conducted at the health system level. To do so, investigators will achieve these specific aims: Aim 1. Identify patient preferences for constructs, and related outcomes, that reflect the expression of implicit bias in clinical encounters. Investigators will use qualitative methods to gather data on the elements associated with the patient perception of implicit bias (e.g. communication, respect, patient-centeredness) to ensure that our selected outcomes reflect the breadth of patients' concerns. Aim 2. Refine an existing implicit bias intervention with input from providers, health system stakeholders and expert consultation. Investigators will conduct a series of semi-structured interviews to gather insights from stakeholders regarding how to best refine the design of our existing implicit bias intervention to ensure that we have addressed potential facilitators and barriers to uptake, use, and sustainability. Aim 3. In a pilot trial, determine the feasibility of delivering the refined implicit bias reduction intervention and assessing patient centered outcomes. Investigators will conduct a feasibility trial using the refined intervention emerging from Aim 2. These feasibility outcomes will prepare investigators for a future, fully-powered randomized trial of implicit bias training. At the conclusion of this study, investigators will be prepared to test the impact of implicit bias training on racial/ethnic disparities in the clinical encounter, and thus move us toward delivery of equitable, evidence-based, patient- centered clinical care.

Interventions

OTHERFocus Groups

Investigators will use qualitative methods to gather data on the elements associated with the patient perception of implicit bias (e.g. communication, respect, patient-centeredness) to ensure that our selected outcomes reflect the breadth of patients' concerns.

To gather insights from stakeholders regarding how to best refine the design of our existing implicit bias intervention to ensure that we have addressed potential facilitators and barriers to uptake, use, and sustainability

OTHERPilot Testing of Implicit Bias Training

Determine the feasibility of delivering the refined implicit bias reduction intervention and assessing patient centered outcomes by giving providers a refined implicit bias training.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Aim 1: * Had at least 2 non-urgent ambulatory care visits any Healthcare facility in the past year (via self-report) * Proficient in English Aim 2: * Providers from Durham-based ambulatory clinics in the Duke Health System or Stakeholder Aim 3: * Providers from the Duke Health System providing care to a continuity patient panel.

Exclusion criteria

Aim 1: * Less than 2 non-urgent visits * Patient not identifying as black, white or Hispanic * Non-English speaking Aim 2: * Not a Duke provider or stakeholder Aim 3: * Not a Duke Health system provider/affiliated provider * Does not provide clinical care at a Duke affiliated facility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Training Measured by Participation4 hours (post-training)Investigators will judge the trial as feasible if at least 50% of eligible providers agree to participate.
Acceptability4 hours (post-training)At least 80% of those enrolled complete the trial (attend both sessions); and achieve at least 75% adherence to all intervention activities and exercises.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Variability in Any Trial Outcomes by Provider-related Characteristics4 hours (post-training)Investigators will also gather provider data (age, sex, race, practice characteristics, time in practice, etc.) via self-report and assess and variability in outcomes by these characteristics.
Change in IAT Outcomes From Baseline to Immediately Post-interventionbaseline, 4 hours (post-training)Investigators will ask participants to complete an implicit association test (IAT) at baseline and immediately following training using the Brief IAT measure, which can be administered in under 5 minutes on a laptop computer. The Brief IAT provides comparable findings on implicit racial attitudes tests, when validated against the longer IAT measure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patient Focus Groups
Identify patient preferences for constructs, and related outcomes, that reflect the expression of implicit bias in clinical encounters. I Focus Groups: Investigators will use qualitative methods to gather data on the elements associated with the patient perception of implicit bias (e.g. communication, respect, patient-centeredness) to ensure that our selected outcomes reflect the breadth of patients' concerns.
50
Stakeholders Cognitive Interviews
Investigators will conduct a series of semi-structured interviews. Cognitive Interviews: To gather insights from stakeholders regarding how to best refine the design of our existing implicit bias intervention to ensure that we have addressed potential facilitators and barriers to uptake, use, and sustainability
27
Pilot Testing of Implicit Bias Training
Refined intervention emerging from Aim 2. T Pilot Testing of Implicit Bias Training: Determine the feasibility of delivering the refined implicit bias reduction intervention and assessing patient centered outcomes by giving providers a refined implicit bias training.
37
Total114

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyScheduling Conflicts007

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPatient Focus GroupsPilot Testing of Implicit Bias TrainingStakeholders Cognitive Interviews
Age, Continuous42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants11 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
86 Participants39 Participants36 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
15 Participants0 Participants0 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants0 Participants10 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
30 Participants20 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
68 Participants26 Participants24 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
85 Participants40 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants10 Participants8 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 270 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 270 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 270 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability

At least 80% of those enrolled complete the trial (attend both sessions); and achieve at least 75% adherence to all intervention activities and exercises.

Time frame: 4 hours (post-training)

Population: Primary outcome was only measured for participants enrolled in Aim 3.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pilot Testing of Implicit Bias TrainingAcceptability29 Participants
Primary

Feasibility of Training Measured by Participation

Investigators will judge the trial as feasible if at least 50% of eligible providers agree to participate.

Time frame: 4 hours (post-training)

Population: Data not collected.

Secondary

Change in IAT Outcomes From Baseline to Immediately Post-intervention

Investigators will ask participants to complete an implicit association test (IAT) at baseline and immediately following training using the Brief IAT measure, which can be administered in under 5 minutes on a laptop computer. The Brief IAT provides comparable findings on implicit racial attitudes tests, when validated against the longer IAT measure.

Time frame: baseline, 4 hours (post-training)

Population: Data not collected.

Secondary

Variability in Any Trial Outcomes by Provider-related Characteristics

Investigators will also gather provider data (age, sex, race, practice characteristics, time in practice, etc.) via self-report and assess and variability in outcomes by these characteristics.

Time frame: 4 hours (post-training)

Population: Data not collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026