Skip to content

A Prospective Observational Program Using Digital Technology Tools to Enhance Patient Adherence to Omacor Therapy

A Prospective Observational Program Using Digital Technology Tools to Enhance Patient Adherence to Omacor Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03415152
Acronym
DIAPAsOn
Enrollment
3000
Registered
2018-01-30
Start date
2018-01-24
Completion date
2019-07-01
Last updated
2020-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

History of Myocardial Infarction, Hypertriglyceridemia

Keywords

Omacor, Omega-3-acid ethyl esters, patient adherence, patient reported outcomes

Brief summary

A prospective observational program using digital technology tools to enhance patient adherence to Omacor therapy

Detailed description

It is known that only 50% of patients with chronic diseases adhere to medical recommendations; at the same time, high patient adherence significantly improve the survival of patients with chronic diseases. The treatment duration required to achieve a significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular complications is the subject of discussion, but studies demonstrate that long-term therapy for 5 years or more gives the greatest effect. Today, during the era of technological progress, there is a possibility to freely apply information and telecommunication technologies (e.g. cell phones, computer) in different fields, including medicine. Remote monitoring of patients by means of phone calls using structured questionnaires can also significantly improve clinical outcomes (mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations) by 38%. Unfortunately, in the case of a long-term, usually lifetime, treatment, the use of such methods is still very limited on a large scale. This prospective observational program will help to explore the use of digital technologies and evaluate their effectiveness to increase patient adherence using an example of patients whose treatment scheme includes Omacor. Physicians and patients will be granted a personal access to the electronic data capture system. The physician will enter data about patients who signed the informed consent into the electronic system. At Visit 1 the patient will be given a card providing the personal access to his/her account in the electronic system. In addition to visits to the physician, the program specifies remote completion of the electronic form by the patient. Additional objective of the program includes raising patients' awareness about the disease due to familiarization with educational materials available in patient personal account in the electronic system. This study is a prospective observational program within the frames of which Omacor (Omega-3 triglycerides \[EPA/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) = 1.2/1 - 90%\]) is prescribed to patients with a history of myocardial infarction within a routine procedure as a part of the combination therapy (in combination with statins, antiaggregants, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE)) and/or to patients with hypertriglyceridemia. The population of observed patients will be limited to those who were prescribed Omacor for the first time or not earlier than 3 months after the last dose of Omacor and course of administration is at least 6 months. Discontinuation of the drug product administration by the patient is not the reason for exclusion of the patient from the study. For outcome measures which are applicable, further analysis will be performed in subgroups of patients with the different medication adherence rate: \<0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3. Adherence rate will be calculated as the sum of days when patient taken the full prescribed dose of Omacor in period divided by the number of days in period.

Interventions

Observational study without intervention, Omacor is prescribed in routine manner in accordance with clinical practice and the valid Instruction for Medical Use regarding the dose, duration of therapy, patient population, and therapeutic indication.

Sponsors

Abbott
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women ≥ 18 years of age * Patients with history of myocardial infarction not earlier than 6 months ago. AND/OR Patients with diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia * Patients having been prescribed Omacor (Omega-3 triglycerides \[EPA/DHA = 1.2/1 - 90%\]) for at least 6 months AND who have been taking Omacor no more than 14 days at the time of enrollment into the program. * Patients who can, in the opinion of the Investigator, himself or through immediate relatives's help complete electronic system of data collection through mobile application or web-browser * Patients who have signed the consent to participate in this program before entering their data in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and who understand their right to discontinue the program at any time

Exclusion criteria

* Patients taken medicines (except for Omacor) or nutrition supplements containing omega-3 in any proportions at the time of enrollment into the program OR it has been less than 3 months since last dose of medicines or nutrition supplements containing omega-3 taken. * Female patients during pregnancy or breastfeeding * Patients with increased sensitivity to the active substance, excipients, and soy * Patients with exogenous hypertriglyceridemia (type I hyperchylomicronemia) * Participation in any other clinical or non-clinical study/program at present or within the latest 30 days * Patients with any other clinical states that make him/her ineligible for the program on the study doctor's opinion based on clinical assessment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)6 monthsMean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy Termination6 monthsThe percentage of patients (%) who have chosen each of the suggested reason for therapy termination.
The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)3 months, 6 monthsMean difference of the average score on each of 8 scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 versus the baseline. 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) taps eight health concepts. Each of 36 items is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively, so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.
Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)3 months, 6 monthsMean difference of lipid profile parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1\)
Number of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients with hospitalizations due to cardiovascular disease
Number of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients with new cases of stenocardia
Number of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients with non-fatal myocardial infarction cases
Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)6 monthsThe average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance for all study duration Visit 1 - Visit 3. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance
Mean Adherence Rate at Visit 23 monthsMean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.
Change of Mean Adherence Rate by End of the Study (Visit 3) Versus Visit 23 months, 6 monthsMean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.
The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 33 months, 6 monthsThe percentage of patients with adherence rate \<0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3
Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 1, Visit 20 months, 3 monthsThe average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance at Visit 1, Visit 2. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance
Change of Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 2 and Visit 3 Versus Baseline (Visit 1)Baseline, 3 Months, 6 MonthsThe text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance
Number of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients dead due to cardio-vascular death

Countries

Russia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Adult patients with history of myocardial infarction not earlier than 6 months ago and/or with diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia who having been prescribed Omacor for at least 6 months. Omacor (Omega-3-acid ethyl esters): Observational study without intervention, Omacor is prescribed in routine manner in accordance with clinical practice and the valid Instruction for Medical Use regarding the dose, duration of therapy, patient population, and therapeutic indication.
2,572
Total2,572

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
972 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1600 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2518 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
2572 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1390 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 3,000
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 3,000
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3,000

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)

Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Population of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Mean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)0.37 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

Mean difference of lipid profile parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1\)

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: Per protocol population: patients who attended at least one follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)total serum cholesterol (TSC) (V2-V1,3m)-1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.09
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)triglycerides (TG) (V2-V1,3m)-0.98 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)low-density lipoproteins (LDLP) (V2-V1,3m)-0.77 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.92
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)high-density lipoproteins (HDLP) (V2-V1,3m)0.15 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.45
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)total serum cholesterol (TSC) (V3-V1,6m)-1.32 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.28
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)triglycerides (TG) (V3-V1,6m)-1.32 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.15
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)low-density lipoproteins (LDLP) (V3-V1,6m)-1.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.02
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)high-density lipoproteins (HDLP) (V3-V1,6m)0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Change of Mean Adherence Rate by End of the Study (Visit 3) Versus Visit 2

Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: Population of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Mean Adherence Rate by End of the Study (Visit 3) Versus Visit 20.24 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Change of Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 2 and Visit 3 Versus Baseline (Visit 1)

The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

Population: Per protocol population: patients who attended at least one follow-up visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 2 and Visit 3 Versus Baseline (Visit 1)Mean difference (V 2-V 1, 3 m)0.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Change of Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 2 and Visit 3 Versus Baseline (Visit 1)Mean difference (V 3-V 1, 6 m)0.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Secondary

Mean Adherence Rate at Visit 2

Mean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Population of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Mean Adherence Rate at Visit 20.48 proportion of daysStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 1, Visit 2

The average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance at Visit 1, Visit 2. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

Time frame: 0 months, 3 months

Population: Per protocol population: patients who attended at least one follow-up visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 1, Visit 2Mean score (V 1, 0 m)12.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) [9] at Visit 1, Visit 2Mean score (V 2, 3 m)12.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Secondary

Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)

The average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance for all study duration Visit 1 - Visit 3. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Population of patients attended at Visit 3 (month 6)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
Secondary

Number of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients dead due to cardio-vascular death

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Number of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program0.04 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients with hospitalizations due to cardiovascular disease

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Number of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the ProgramThe presence of hospitalizations0.74 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Number of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the ProgramThe absence of hospitalizations99.26 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients with new cases of stenocardia

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Number of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the ProgramThe presence of new cases of angina pectoris0.97 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Number of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the ProgramThe absence of new cases of angina pectoris99.03 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the Program

Percentage of patients with non-fatal myocardial infarction cases

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Number of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the ProgramPresence of cases of non-fatal myocardial infarcti0.04 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Number of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the ProgramAbsence of cases of nonfatal myocardial infarctio99.96 percentage of participants
Secondary

The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)

Mean difference of the average score on each of 8 scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 versus the baseline. 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) taps eight health concepts. Each of 36 items is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively, so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: Population of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administration

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Social functioning (V3-V1,6m)16.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.41
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Physical functioning (V2-V1,3 m)7.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Role limitations due to physical health (V2-V1,3m)32.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.42
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Role limitations due to emotional problems (V2-V1,25.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.42
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Energy/fatique (V2-V1,3m)20.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.12
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Emotional wellbeing (V2-V1,3m)22.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.69
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Social functioning (V2-V1,3m)26.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.68
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Pain (V2-V1,3m)8.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.12
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)General health (V2-V1,3m)-6.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.22
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Physical functioning (V3-V1,6m)6.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.08
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Role limitations due to physical health (V3-V1,6m)29.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.39
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Role limitations due to emotional problems (V3-V1,18.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.39
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Energy/fatique (V3-V1,6m)18.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.59
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Emotional wellbeing (V3-V1,6m)25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.56
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Pain (V3-V1,6m)0.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)General Health (V3-V1,6m)-9.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.08
Secondary

The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy Termination

The percentage of patients (%) who have chosen each of the suggested reason for therapy termination.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationAbsence at the pharmacy0.23 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationAdverse drug reactions0 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationLack of efficacy0.08 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationInconvenience of use0.43 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationOther reason1.94 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationTotal2.68 percentage of participants
Secondary

The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3

The percentage of patients with adherence rate \<0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: Population of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administration

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3Low (<0.5) (V2, 3 m)50 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3Moderate (0.5 - 0.7) (V2, 3 m)15.56 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3High (≥0.8) (V2, 3 m)34.44 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3Low (<0.5) (V3, 6 m)75 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3Moderate (0.5 - 0.7) (V3, 6 m)4.44 percentage of participants
Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)The Percentage of Patients With Adherence Rate <0,5, 0,5-0,7, ≥0,8 at Visit 2 and Visit 3High (≥0.8) (V3, 6 m)20.56 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026