Skip to content

Assessing Cirrhosis Quality of Care While Accounting for Cost

Assessing Cirrhosis Quality of Care While Accounting for Cost: Is the Patient and/or Caregiver Perspective Associated With Outcomes or Quality Metrics, and What is the Cost of Implementing and Measuring Quality Metrics

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03414398
Enrollment
273
Registered
2018-01-30
Start date
2017-12-26
Completion date
2021-07-01
Last updated
2019-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cirrhosis

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to determine what influences the patient and caregiver perception of care, and if this perception associates with the percentage of and what quality metrics are being met and outcomes. The investigators also plan to capture the cost of providing quality metrics and the cost of monitoring adherence to quality metrics.

Detailed description

This study will be conducted using mixed-methods. The qualitative part will consist of in person, 1:1, open ended in depth interviews using a standard interview guide with probes. The quantitative part will document subjects meeting or not meeting the quality metrics supported by strong evidence, clinical outcomes, and medical bills.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

New York Presbyterian Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* primary liver cirrhosis * receiving care at the study cite * no evidence of hepatic encephalopathy if the subject is providing consent

Exclusion criteria

* no documentation of cirrhosis * unable to confirm diagnosis of cirrhosis by imaging or pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant perceptions of care2 yearsQualitative interview performed where the participant describes their experience of the quality of care they have received.
Relationship of perceptions of quality of care to recent hospitalizations2 yearsAssess associations of qualitative themes that emerge from the qualitative interview with hospitalization frequency
Relationship of perceptions of quality of care to portal hypertension quality metric adherence2 yearsAssess associations of qualitative themes that emerge from the qualitative interview with physician meeting of portal hypertension quality metric (i.e., physician follows the recommended management (yes/no)).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess if portal hypertension quality metric adherence equates to less hospitalizations2 yearsTo see if there is an association of portal hypertension quality metric adherence (i.e. physician follows the recommended management of portal hypertension (yes/no)) to frequency of hospitalizations.
Association of quality metric adherence with survival2 yearsWe will explore adherence with proposed portal hypertension quality metric (physician follows the management (yes/no)) to see if there is an association with survival. The quality metric will be identified as either being met or not met, and survival will also be identified as having occurred or not.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactNicole T Shen, MD
nts9004@nyp.org3146095911

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026