Skip to content

Vaginal Preparation Prior to Hysterectomy

Is Chlorhexidine Vaginal Preparation Prior to Hysterectomy Superior to Iodine in Reducing Bacterial Count; a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03412734
Enrollment
94
Registered
2018-01-26
Start date
2018-05-18
Completion date
2020-01-29
Last updated
2021-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hysterectomy

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled trial to determine the influence of chlorhexidine gluconate surgical/topical antiseptic solutions on the bacterial environment of the vagina during hysterectomy and compare that to the effect of standard iodine-based preparations on the same.

Detailed description

Postoperative infection remains the most common complication of surgical procedures in gynecology. Historically, 30-40% of patients undergoing a hysterectomy develop a post-operative infection. The initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis for appropriate surgical procedures was a significant advancement in the prevention of surgical site infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been standardized and universally implemented. A remaining variable is the method of aseptic preparation of the vagina with substantial variation of technique being reported even within institutions. The most recent Committee Opinion by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists concludes there is insufficient evidence to render a strong recommendation for either povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine as the ideal agent for surgical preparation of the vagina and that further evidence is necessary. Povidone-iodine solution has been considered the standard for aseptic surgical preparation of the vagina for decades and is the only solution approved by the FDA for vaginal use. There are however specific qualities of the solution that suggest it may be less than ideal for use in the vagina. More contemporary efforts have begun to focus on chlorhexidine as a more ideal agent for aseptic efforts in surgical preparation of the vagina. The purpose of our study is to use a randomized controlled trial to determine if chlorhexidine gluconate surgical preparation maintains a lower rate of contamination to the surgical field.

Interventions

DRUGChlorhexidine

Chlorhexidine preparation solutions

DRUGIodine

Iodine-based preparation solutions

Sponsors

TriHealth Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing total vaginal, laparoscopic assisted vaginal, total laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy by a physician at Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates or Tri-State Gynecology Oncology TriHealth Inc. * Concomitant procedures such as vaginal vault suspension, suburethral sling, cystoscopy, enterocele repair, anterior or posterior colporrhaphy, bilateral salpingectomy or salpingooophorectomy, staging procedures, lymph node sampling and other indicated procedures will be included * English speaking * Ability to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

* Unwillingness to participate in the study * Non English speaking * Patients that do not undergo a hysterectomy * Reported allergy to iodine or chlorhexidine preparation solutions * Patients undergoing planned debulking surgery for ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancers * Current infection necessitating hysterectomy * Active sepsis, pelvic abscess or pelvic inflammatory disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Contamination90 minutes from initial preparationContamination is defined as having \>5000 bacteria within a culture

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

6 patients were excluded (3 - not randomized at the day of surgery; 3 - missing study consent).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Chlorhexidine Group
Chlorhexidine: Chlorhexidine preparation solutions
44
Iodine Group
Iodine: Iodine-based preparation solutions
41
Total85

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyExclusion criteria - patient receiving Flagyl for treatment10
Overall StudyIncorrect labeling of samples20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicChlorhexidine GroupIodine GroupTotal
Age, Continuous57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) positive12 Participants18 Participants30 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
42 Participants39 Participants81 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
44 Participants41 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants41 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 440 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 440 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 440 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Contamination

Contamination is defined as having \>5000 bacteria within a culture

Time frame: 90 minutes from initial preparation

Population: Use participants with cultures at 90 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Chlorhexidine GroupNumber of Participants With Contamination20 Participants
Iodine GroupNumber of Participants With Contamination35 Participants
Comparison: We hypothesized that chlorhexidine would have a lower bacterial count compared to iodine. Our sample size was calculated to be 71 patients per arm to detect a 22% difference in cultures defined as contaminated at 90 minutes from surgical preparation.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.02, 37.34]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026