Skip to content

Music vs. No Music During Cesarean Delivery on Patient Satisfaction

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Music vs. No Music During Cesarean Delivery on Patient Satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03412019
Enrollment
22
Registered
2018-01-26
Start date
2018-02-21
Completion date
2019-08-06
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

Music, Patient Satisfaction

Brief summary

Several studies have demonstrated that music can improve various outcomes during labor and delivery. However, many of these studies didn't measure satisfaction rate accurately. This study aim to assess patient satisfaction in the setting of music or no music during the cesarean delivery. The study will be conducted in the labor and delivery unit and the expected number to enroll and complete the study is 22.

Detailed description

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that music can improve various outcomes during labor and delivery. In particular, patient satisfaction is often measured on a simple VAS scale, where 0 is no satisfaction and 10 is the highest satisfaction. However, patient satisfaction is a complex parameter to measure, and may be affected by a number of different factors. This study will be performed on the labor and delivery unit to assess patient satisfaction with a validated, reliable, 22-question survey in the setting of music or no music during the cesarean delivery. Although music is an all-encompassing term that describes sound with different pitches and rhythms that comes together as a harmonious whole, not all music is the same. Using music for therapeutic purposes would be the equivalent of using antibiotics to cure an infection; it is too general of a term, and unlikely that such a general use of music would show a valid therapeutic benefit. However, a study demonstrated that specific selections of Mozart piano sonatas, which have a specific rhythm and mode, improve patient anxiety through a biochemical mechanism (changing the plasma levels of IL-6 and epinephrine). Therefore, in this study, the term music will specifically means the same Mozart sonatas as described in the prior study. Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine the effect of music on patient satisfaction and anxiety during cesarean delivery. The hypothesis is that parturients exposed to music during cesarean delivery will have greater overall satisfaction and less anxiety. Study Timelines: * Participation begins at the time of consultation for cesarean delivery on the day of surgery, where the co-investigator Dr. Dahlawi will approach the participants and ask them to sign the ICF, and it ends after the post-anesthesia check on postoperative day 1. After recruitment and consent, patients will be randomized using a computer-generated randomization scheme will be used to allocate patients to one of the arms of the study. * The two arms of the study are as follows: * Control group: baseline hemodynamics and anxiety screen; no music * Intervention group - Mozart: A study investigator will turn on a playlist of pre-selected Mozart music.

Interventions

OTHERMusic

Selections of Mozart piano sonatas

Sponsors

Tufts Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

There will be two arms of this randomized controlled trial as follows: * Control group: baseline hemodynamics and anxiety screen; no music * Intervention group - Mozart: A study investigator will turn on a playlist of pre-selected Mozart music.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-50 years old * Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery * Nulliparity * Singleton pregnancy * Full term fetus (≥37.0 weeks gestational age) * Healthy fetus (no known congenital diseases at the time of surgery) * Requesting neuraxial anesthesia for the procedure * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusal * Prior history of extensive abdominal surgery * Active labor * Contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia * Uncorrected coagulopathy * Infection at the skin site of epidural placement * Increased intracranial pressure * Untreated hemodynamic instability * Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (a.k.a. amide or ester allergy) * Patients with impaired hearing * Patient on anti-anxiolytic medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction1 DayThis outcome will be measured using Morgan's Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Cesarean Section (MSSCS). It is a 22-item questionnaire, each item have a Likert scale from 1-7 (1 =strongly disagree, 7=strongly agree), yielding a composite (total) score ranging 22-154, representing lowest to highest satisfaction. The questionnaire will be given to participants on post-operative day one during the hours of 8am-1pm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient AnxietyPerioperativelyChange in anxiety before and after surgery using a numeric rating scale from 0 (no anxiety at all) to 10 (greatest anxiety)
Hemodynamic Parameter (Mean Arterial Pressure, MAP)post procedureThis is the post-procedure mean arterial pressure of the patients.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
no music
10
Intervention Group
Music: selections of Mozart piano sonatas
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention GroupTotalControl Group
Age, Continuous32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
36.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Satisfaction

This outcome will be measured using Morgan's Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Cesarean Section (MSSCS). It is a 22-item questionnaire, each item have a Likert scale from 1-7 (1 =strongly disagree, 7=strongly agree), yielding a composite (total) score ranging 22-154, representing lowest to highest satisfaction. The questionnaire will be given to participants on post-operative day one during the hours of 8am-1pm.

Time frame: 1 Day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupPatient Satisfaction120 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Intervention GroupPatient Satisfaction116 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Secondary

Hemodynamic Parameter (Mean Arterial Pressure, MAP)

This is the post-procedure mean arterial pressure of the patients.

Time frame: post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupHemodynamic Parameter (Mean Arterial Pressure, MAP)82.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 24.8
Intervention GroupHemodynamic Parameter (Mean Arterial Pressure, MAP)80.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.4
Secondary

Patient Anxiety

Change in anxiety before and after surgery using a numeric rating scale from 0 (no anxiety at all) to 10 (greatest anxiety)

Time frame: Perioperatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupPatient Anxiety2.5 NRS scale (0-10)Standard Deviation 2.6
Intervention GroupPatient Anxiety2.7 NRS scale (0-10)Standard Deviation 2.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026