Skip to content

Targeting Balance Confidence to Increase Community Integration in Users of Prostheses

Targeting Balance Confidence as a Strategy to Increase Integration and Improve Outcomes in Users of Lower-Limb Prostheses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03411148
Enrollment
22
Registered
2018-01-26
Start date
2018-04-05
Completion date
2022-05-01
Last updated
2022-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation, Physical Activity

Keywords

fear avoidance, cognitive behavioral therapy, physical therapy, prosthetic, fear of falling, gait

Brief summary

Low balance confidence occurs when an individual perceives they have limited ability to maintain their balance while performing a specific task of daily living. It is a prevalent problem in lower limb prosthesis users and is a strong predictor of prosthesis use and community participation. Balance confidence is not necessarily related to functional abilities. It is possible to improve functional ability as a result of rehabilitation, without concurrently improving balance confidence. Interventions to address low balance confidence may need to target both functional abilities as well as beliefs regarding these abilities. The purpose of this study is to test whether, for users of lower limb prostheses, an intervention combining physical therapy exercise to improve function with cognitive behavioral therapy to address fears and thoughts associated with low confidence can improve balance confidence and promote community participation.

Detailed description

Lower limb prosthesis users, with self-reported low balance confidence complete baseline gait analysis and balance testing, as well as a series of validated self-reported outcome scales addressing balance confidence, quality of life, and community integration. Participants are then provided a step activity monitor (SAM) and a global position sensing (GPS) tracker to be worn for one week, the data from which is linked and used to objectively quantify baseline community participation. At the conclusion of the one week, participants are randomized to one of two groups, each of which will last for 8 weeks. At the conclusion of the eight weeks, participants repeat baseline assessments and are again provided a SAM and GPS tracker to wear for one week. Baseline measures and activity monitoring occur again 8 and 16 weeks thereafter.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWeekly exercise sessions with physical therapist and psychologist

Eight weekly sessions integrating techniques from physical therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. At the start of each session participants play virtual reality games that target balance and functional gait and then discuss their balance confidence and activity avoidance behaviors with a behavioural counselor. Weekly homework assignments ask participants to report on thoughts causing them to avoid activities and to slowly engage in activities that present increasing levels of fear.

Stretching and other exercises are safely taught by physical therapist and then practiced at home following a provided schedule. Participants receive periodic calls to discuss progress.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
CollaboratorOTHER
Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center
CollaboratorFED
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥18 years * unilateral lower limb amputation without serious complications * at least 6 months experience using a definitive lower limb prosthesis * Activity Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale score≤80 * self-reported concern about balance that limit activities

Exclusion criteria

* active wounds on weight bearing surfaces * inability to perform the protocol without an assistive device * currently seeing a physical therapist for any reason * history of neurodegenerative disease * history of stroke * ill-fitting or ill-functioning prosthesis (to be verified by research prosthetist during screening) * prohibited by primary care physician or research physician to participate in mild exercise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Community integration24 weeksnumber of steps taken outside of the home

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Role Limitation due to Emotional Problems scale from the Short Form Health Survey (SF36)24 weeksThe scale measures the extent to which emotional problems interfere with work and daily activities on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating less interference
Frenchay Activity Index24 weeksThis is a behavioral scale that primarily measures social participation, as well as daily activities on a score of 0-45 with higher scores indicating greater social activity.
Change from baseline in Activity-specific balance confidence scale following the intervention8 weeksThe ABC scale measures balance confidence on a scale of 0-100 with higher values indicating greater confidence
Activity-specific balance confidence scale24 weeksThe ABC scale measures balance confidence on a scale of 0-100 with higher values indicating greater confidence. Measurement at this time point will indicate the lasting impact of the intervention on balance confidence
Perceived Limitation scale from the Measure of Community Reintegration of Servicemembers24 weeksThe scale measures self-perceived limitations in community participation n a score of 10-70 with higher scores indicating less limitation
Social Functioning scale from the 36-item Short Form Health Survey24 weeksThe scale measures the extent to which physical and emotional problems interfere with social activities on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating less interference
Extent of Participation scale from the Measure of Community Reintegration of Servicemembers24 weeksThe scale measures community participation in terms of how often an individual engages in certain activities on a score of 10-70 with higher scores indicating greater participation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline on L-test performance8 wksParticipants rise from a chair without armrests, walk 3m, turn right, walk 7m, turn around and trace their path back to the start. Time to complete the task is noted.
Well-being scale from the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire24 weeksThe scale measures overall quality of life on a score of 0-100 with higher scores indicating increased quality of life.
Change from baseline in Berg Balance Scale8 wksThis scale measures measures balance function by assessing the performance of functional tasks. It is scored from 0-45 with high scores indicating better balance.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026