Skip to content

Effect of the Neck Extension on Blind Intubation Via Ambu® AuraGain™

Effect of the Neck Extension on Blind Intubation Via Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03408431
Enrollment
124
Registered
2018-01-24
Start date
2018-01-25
Completion date
2018-05-01
Last updated
2018-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Complication, Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Brief summary

In a previous study, NCT03147469, the investigators found that the vocal cords were more easily visualized by fiberoptic bronchoscopy with neck extension positioning. On the basis of this finding, the investigators are going to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of neck extension on the success rate of blind intubation through laryngeal mask. Participants undergoing general anesthesia will be randomly assigned to group E (with neck extension) or group C (with neutral position). Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask will be placed first, and then, a lubricated endotracheal tube will be gently intubated through the laryngeal mask. The participants will be mechanically ventilated with an endotracheal tube if blind intubation succeed. Blind intubation will be performed with a maximum of two attempts. If all attempts failed, the laryngeal mask will be removed and the tube will be intubated using a direct laryngoscopy. The primary outcome of this study is the success rate of blind intubation within a first attempt. Secondary outcomes included overall success rate of blind intubation within a maximum of two attempts, time for blind intubation, the incidence of postoperative hoarseness, cough, and sore throat, and any obvious complications related to airway management such as bleeding, airway trauma, dental fracture, aspiration, or bronchospasm.

Interventions

Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask will be placed first, and then, a lubricated endotracheal tube will be gently intubated through the laryngeal mask under each position according to the assigned group.

Patients' neck will be maximally extended (\ 60°) during blind intubation.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency operation * History of esophageal, oropharyngeal, or laryngeal disease * History of cervical spine surgery * Insufficient NPO time * Loosening teeth * Mouth opening less than 2cm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate in first attemptIn a first attempt for blind intubation, an average of 30 secondsSuccessful blind intubation in a first attempt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall success rateIn a maximum of two attempts for blind intubation, an average of 60 secondsSuccessful blind intubation within a maximum of two attempts
Time for blind intubationIn a maximum of two attempts for blind intubation, an average of 60 secondsTime between insertion of an endotracheal tube within the laryngeal mask and detection of end-tidal CO2 from the tube
Postoperative hoarseness24 hours after extubationThe incidence of postoperative hoarseness
Postoperative cough24 hours after extubationThe incidence of postoperative cough
Postoperative sore throat24 hours after extubationThe incidence of postoperative sore throat

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026