Skip to content

Pulmonary Rehabilitation to Improve Physical Capacity After Pulmonary Embolism

Pulmonary Rehabilitation to Improve Physical Capacity After Pulmonary Embolism - a Randomized Controlled Trial - The REHAB Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03405480
Enrollment
209
Registered
2018-01-23
Start date
2018-01-20
Completion date
2024-03-30
Last updated
2023-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism, Dyspnea, Post Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome, PPS, Rehabilitation, Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)

Brief summary

This project aims to evaluate a rehabilitation program as treatment and uncover potential pathophysiological mechanisms of a newly identified chronic condition named Post Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome (PPS).

Detailed description

The newly identified Post Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome (PPS) is characterized by chronic persistent, but unexplained dyspnea (i.e. without signs of pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary abnormality). Symptoms are considerable, but less severe than in CTEPH patients. A recent study performed by our group confirmed that up to 50% of our patients complained of various grades of persistent unexplained dyspnea 1-10 years after the diagnosis of PE. In this multifaceted project we wish to evaluate the effect of an eight week rehabilitation program led and supervised by a trained physiotherapist on exercise capacity in PPS patients. This interventional part of the study will be formed as a randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to either usual care or a physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation program. The study also aims to explore potential underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in PPS, using state of the art methods such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography involving novel methods focusing on the right ventricle. The pathophysiological part of the study will be formed as a case control study, where post PE-patients who do not fulfill the criteria for PPS will serve as controls.

Interventions

OTHERRehabilitation

Rehabilitation

Sponsors

University Hospital, Akershus
CollaboratorOTHER
Ullevaal University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Objectively diagnosed symptomatic pulmonary embolism by CTPA or high-probability scintigraphy 6 months to 6 years before inclusion * Persistent dyspnea defined as modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale \>= 1 that has appeared or worsened after the diagnosis of PE (eligibility criteria for randomization)

Exclusion criteria

* Significant pulmonary disease (COPD GOLD \>= 2, restrictive pulmonary disease, lung cancer or pleural disease. * Heart failure (either HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF as defined in ESC guidelines) * Significant valvular heart disease * Chronic thromboemboli pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) * Patients unfit for rehabilitation or walking tests du to old age, physical disability or disease * Patients with a history of poor compliance or any condition that would interfere with the ability to comply with the study protocol e.g. history of drug abuse, excessive alcohol beverage consumption, cognitive dysfunction or severe psychiatric disease * Active malignancy * Life expectancy less than 3 months * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ISWTISWT wil be performed at 12 weeks and 36 weeks after baselineChange in Incremental Shuttle Walk Test will be primary endpoint for interventional part of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mMRC12 weeks and 36 weeks after inclusionThe effect of rehabilitation on dyspnea measured by mMRC breathlessness scale
Sensewear12 weeks and 36 weeks after baselineThe effect of PRP on daily physical activity as measured with an activity monitor (Sensewear)
HRQoL by EQ-5d12 weeks and 36 weeks after baselineThe effect of rehabilitation on HRQoL measured by EQ-5D
HRQoL by PEmb-QoL12 weeks and 36 weeks after baselineThe effect of rehabilitation on HRQoL measured by PEmb-QoL
Test-retest reliability of the ISWT in this patient populationAt baseline, 12 weeks and 36 weeksTest-retest reliability of the ISWT in this patient population
Minimum clinically important difference for ISWT36 weeks after baselineEstablish the minimum clinically important difference (MID) for the ISWT in patients with PPS expressed in meters.
Proportion of patients who achieves the established minimum clinically important difference36 weeks after baselineProportion of patients who achieves the established minimum clinically important difference for ISWT for this population
Long term effect of physical capacity6 months after completing rehabilitationThe long-term effect of rehabilitation on physical capacity measured by ISWT, 6 months after completing the rehabilitation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial fibrosis evaluated by cardiac MRIAt baselineThe primary objective in the pathophysiology part of the study is to investigate whether diffuse myocardial fibrosis shown by CMR is associated with PPS

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026