Skip to content

Study on 30 Outpatients With Chronic Migraine Treated With Well-Being Therapy or With a Control Therapy

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Well-Being Therapy vs a Control Condition in Chronic Migraine Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03404336
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-01-19
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Migraine

Keywords

migraine, chronic, well-being therapy, psychotherapy, therapy

Brief summary

Chronic migraine is a disabling type of migraine and is often resistant to treatment. Non-pharmacological interventions have been investigated as potential treatment although, unfortunately, the literature on their efficacy is poor and showed mixed results. Well-Being Therapy (WBT) is a brief psychotherapy which has shown efficacy in decreasing the relapse rates of depression in adults, in generalized anxiety disorder and in cyclothymia. It can be implemented to empower psychological well-being. The aim of the present study is to test the efficacy of WBT in a sample of patients with chronic migraine to verify if it reduces the disability due to migraine and distress, it increases the psychological well-being as well as the level of euthymia.

Detailed description

Chronic migraine is a disabling type of migraine and is often resistant to treatment. Non-pharmacological interventions have been investigated as potential treatment although, unfortunately, the literature on their efficacy is poor and showed mixed results. The psychological interventions tested up to now are the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and the Mindfulness. Well-Being Therapy (WBT) is a brief psychotherapy which has been manualized in 2016 and has shown efficacy in randomized clinical trials. It showed to be effective in decreasing the relapse rates of depression in adults, it showed to be effective in generalized anxiety disorder and in cyclothymia. Thus, psychological well-being can be implemented and empowered via a specific psychotherapy and this implementation might produce a protecting effect, thus favoring prevention. The aim of the present study is to test the efficacy of WBT in a sample of patients with chronic migraine. First the efficacy of WBT will be verified in terms of disability due to migraine. Then, the efficacy of WBT will be measured in terms of psychological well-being, euthymia, and distress. For this purpose, 30 chromic migraine outpatients will be enrolled in a randomized, controlled, open clinical study.

Interventions

Session 1: identifying and setting episodes of wellbeing into situational context. Session 2: identifying interfering thoughts and behaviors. Session 3: illustrating autonomy, reflecting and practicing it. Session 4: illustrating environmental mastery, reflecting and practicing it. Session 5: illustrating positive relations with others, reflecting and practicing it. Session 6: illustrating personal growth, reflecting and practicing it. Session 7: illustrating self-acceptance, reflecting and practicing it. Session 8: illustrating purpose in life, reflecting and practicing it.

OTHERControl condition

Session 1: illustrating the concept of lifestyle and well-being. Session 2 and session 3: illustrating healthy eating and steps to healthy eating. Session 4: illustrating physical exercise and how it promotes health. Session 5: illustrating smoking and tobacco and how they can damage health. Session 6: illustrating alcohol and how it can damage health. Session 7: illustrating drugs misuse and how it can damage health. Session 8: illustrating sexual health. No access to specific WBT ingredients will be allowed.

Sponsors

University of Florence
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will not be informed if they will receive the WBT or the control condition. Of course, after the end of the study they will receive this information and they will be told why they were blind.

Intervention model description

This is a pilot study, designed as a randomized (1:1) controlled trial, comparing WBT vs a control condition. The patients will receive a baseline assessment to confirm the diagnosis of chronic migraine, then socio-demographic information, information on pharmacological/non-pharmacological treatments, on the history of medical diseases and on the psychological status will be collected as well as the number of migraine attacks per month, the duration of migraine attacks, the occurrence of migraine exclusively with menses, and the level of disability related to migraine. Thereafter, the subjects will be randomly assigned to WBT or to a control condition. The subjects will be re-assessed at the end of session 4, 8 of treatment, at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. able and interested in participating to the present research project, as proved by signed Informed consent; 2. 18-65 years of age; 3. Italian mother tongue; 4. diagnosis of chronic migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Thus, presenting specific features (i.e., unilateral and pulsating pain of moderate or severe intensity, which is aggravated or precipitated by routine physical activities and is combined with nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia) and migraine headache on ≥ 15 days per month; 5. headache chronicity for a minimum of 1 year and pattern of headache symptoms stable for a period of at least 6 months; 6. no pharmacological therapy or dietary supplements use for chronic migraine OR pharmacological therapy/dietary supplement use for chronic migraine stable since at least 3 months; 7. psychotropic medication allowed only if stable since at least three months.

Exclusion criteria

1. diagnosis of medication overuse headache; 2. co-occurrence of psychiatric disorder(s) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders (DSM) 5th edition as diagnosed via the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview; 3. co-occurrence of chronic unstable medical conditions; 4. being pregnant or lactating; 5. under exogeneous hormones treatment (i.e., hormonal contraceptives, postmenopausal hormone therapy); 6. any other condition that, according to the Investigators' opinion, may alter the ability of the patient to follow study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
disability due to migrainefrom baseline to 3-month follow uplevel of disability due to migraine assessed via the Migraine Disability Assessment Score (score from 0 to \>21, for total score \> 6 disability is clinically relevant)
frequency of migraine attacksfrom baseline to 3-month follow upfrequency of migraine attacks assessed via a daily self-report headache diary (higher the frequency, higher the severity of migraine)
duration of migraine attacksfrom baseline to 3-month follow upduration of migraine attacks assessed via a daily self-report headache diary (higher the duration, higher the severity of migraine)
intensity of migraine attacksfrom baseline to 3-month follow upintensity of migraine attacks assessed via a daily self-report headache diary (higher the intensity, higher the severity of migraine)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
level of anxiety and depressionfrom baseline to 3-month follow upthe level of anxiety and depression will be assessed via the Symptom Questionnaire (total score from 0 to 92, higher is the total score and worse is the symptomatology)
level of psychological well-beingfrom baseline to 3-month follow upassessed via the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO 5) (total score from 0 to 25, higher total score means higher quality of life)
the level of euthymiafrom baseline to 3-month follow upthe level of euthymia will be assessed via the euthymia scale (total score from 0 to 10, higher score corresponds to higher level of euthymia)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTFiammetta COSCI, Prof.
fiammetta.cosci@unifi.it0552755066

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026