Skip to content

Intratreatment FDG-PET During Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic and Gastrointestinal Cancers

Intratreatment FDG-PET During Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic and Gastrointestinal Cancers ( Adaptive PET II)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03403465
Enrollment
90
Registered
2018-01-18
Start date
2018-03-27
Completion date
2028-04-05
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anal Canal Cancer, Cancer of the Cervix, Esophageal Cancer, Vulvar Cancer

Brief summary

This study expands on protocol (NCT01908504"PET adaptive RT") designed to evaluate the utility of adaptive PET-CT planning for radiation therapy (RT). Radiation therapy is used in many malignant diseases as a curative treatment modality. However, critical normal tissue is often in close approximation to disease, and portions of such tissue must receive high doses of radiation for appropriate treatment. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) adapted radiation therapy, as defined in the current protocol, may allow for a means of determining the eventual response to therapy, at a time point when adaptation of treatment plan may be possible to improve outcomes. This protocol will build upon the findings the previous protocol (NCT01908504 "PET adaptive RT") that evaluated the utility of intra-treatment PET imaging in multiple types of cancers. The current focus will be more specific to certain types of gastrointestinal and gynecologic cancers treated with RT, identified from the prior study to warrant further research.

Detailed description

Intra-treatment PETs have only recently been studied in small pilot series. In rectal cancer, a prospective trial from MSKCC demonstrated that a PET-CT obtained in the second week of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was able to discriminate sub-optimal responders with a sensitivity of 94% and an accuracy of 78%, though the most useful metric was a novel "visual response score" based on interpreting radiologists scoring rather than more established objective data available from PET, like SUV. A study from China in non-small cell lung cancer found that decreases in SUV and MTV on intra-treatment PET-CTs after 40Gy of chemoradiation therapy were significantly greater in patients responding to treatment by post-treatment RECIST criteria. For head and neck cancers, a Belgian study found that intra-treatment SUVmax at 47Gy was associated with significant differences in overall survival. Therefore, there is emerging evidence that an intra-treatment PET may also be of significant prognostic utility, at an early enough time point to potentially alter treatment accordingly. All participants will be required to complete two research PET scans in addition to standard of care planning CT's for radiation therapy. For all subjects with cancer of the cervix and vulva an intra-treatment PET-CT will be obtained and used to develop a volume adaptive treatment plan for the remainder of the course. Subjects with esophageal and anal canal cancer will have an adapted plan if the treating radiation oncologist determines an adapted plan is clinically relevant.

Interventions

At radiation planning subjects will have a PET-CT. The CT scan - also called computerized tomography or just CT - combines a series of X-ray views taken from many different angles to produce cross-sectional images of the bones and soft tissues inside the body. CT scans in planning radiation therapy are standard of care. A PET is a highly specialized imaging technique that uses short-lived radioactive substances (such as FDG a simple sugar labeled with a radioactive atom) to produce three-dimensional colored images of those substances functioning within the body. These images are called PET scans and the technique is termed PET scanning. PET scanning provides information about the body's chemistry not available through other procedures. Unlike CT or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), techniques that look at anatomy or body form, PET studies metabolic activity or body function.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of cervical, vulvar, esophageal and anal canal cancer Patients with local or regional nodal disease are eligible Zubrod Performance Status 0, 1, or 2 Age ≥ 18 Negative serum pregnancy test for women of child bearing potential Patient must sign study-specific informed consent prior to study entry

Exclusion criteria

No gross disease visible on imaging at the start of radiotherapy Contraindication to PET Complete response by PET achieved with pre-radiation therapy treatment (surgery or chemotherapy) Breast feeding Positive serum pregnancy test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of subjects with benefit from an intra-treatment PET-CT4 yearsThis benefit lies in the potential to adapt the treatment plan based on an intratreatment PET-CT. This may also be of significant prognostic utility, at an early enough time point to potentially alter treatment accordingly
Pathologic complete response4 yearsPathologic complete response will be collected from pathology reports for subjects who have surgical resection after radiation therapy.
Locoregional controlDay of intra treatment PET-CT/ approx 2-4 hoursThis study will evaluate the prognostic value of intra-treatment functional imaging on clinical relevant tumor endpoints (i.e. locoregional control, freedom from distant metastases, and overall survival).Comparison of intra-treatment FDG-PET indices will identify two groups of responses: PET responses and PET non-responses, which will correlate with prognosis.
Freedom from distant metastases4 yearsSubjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with repeat imaging as per the standard of care, or at the treating investigator's discretion. Frequency of follow up will be determined by the standard practice for the disease site and stage.
Measure overall survival (OS)4 yearsSubjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with the investigators according to the standard of care for each disease site
Progression free survival (PFS)4 yearsSubjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with repeat imaging as per the standard of care for each disease site

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measure the potential sparing of radiation dose to critical normal tissue4 yearsAn intra-treatment PET volume adaptive treatment plan may allow for additional sparing of normal tissue by identifying regions of tumor response and corresponding reduction in the target volumes i.e. dosimetric differences in normal tissue will be compared between the initial plan and the adapted plan.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJunzo Chino, MD

Duke University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026