Skip to content

Prevention of Infections in Cardiac Surgery (PICS) Prevena Study

A Cluster-randomized Factorial Crossover Trial, Comparing Antibiotic Mono-prophylaxis With Cefazolin vs. Dual-prophylaxis With Cefazolin Plus Vancomycin and Conventional Wound Dressing vs. Prevena Negative-pressure Wound Management

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03402945
Acronym
PICS-Prevena
Enrollment
4107
Registered
2018-01-18
Start date
2018-03-05
Completion date
2024-10-17
Last updated
2025-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Site Infections

Keywords

negative pressure wound management system, open-heart surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical site infection

Brief summary

This vanguard study will be conducted at two study sites in Canada. It is a cluster randomized trial to test a combination of two antibiotics for antibiotic prophylaxis as compared to routine prophylaxis with one single antibiotic, and to test a negative-pressure wound management system (Prevena) versus standard wound dressing to reduce chest wound infections.

Detailed description

Despite the routine use of antibiotics before and after cardiac surgery, infections of the chest wound remain a common life threatening complication of heart surgery that is preventable. Antibiotic prophylaxis is well accepted to be the cornerstone of prevention for these infections. The best choice of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing open heart surgery is, however, unclear. A large number of relevant pathogens are not covered by the primarily recommended antibiotic for prophylaxis, and there is a large variability in the antibiotics physicians use in practice and a lack of evidence supporting these choices. Appropriate management of the wound is probably also highly relevant in terms of infection prevention; however, there is a lack of strong evidence guiding the choice of wound management strategies as a means to reduce surgical site infection. The proposed study will test whether dual antibiotic prophylaxis is superior to single-agent prophylaxis with cefazolin, and shed light on whether or not modern negative-pressure wound management technology lower the risk of sternal surgical site infections.

Interventions

Any non-negative pressure wound dressing that is routinely used at study sites will be considered standard of care in the control arms.

DEVICEPrevena

Negative-Pressure Wound Management System

DRUGCefazolin

antibiotic

DRUGVancomycin

antibiotic

Sponsors

Population Health Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinded adjudication of the s-SSIs will be performed by a committee consisting of three members.

Intervention model description

1\) cefazolin prophylaxis plus Prevena\*(\*diabetic and/or obese patients (BMI \>30kg/m2)) 2) cefazolin and vancomycin prophylaxis plus Prevena\*(\*diabetic and/or obese patients (BMI \>30kg/m2)), 3) cefazolin prophylaxis plus standard wound dressing, 4) cefazolin and vancomycin prophylaxis plus standard wound dressing.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- ≥18 years of age undergoing open-heart surgery (sternotomy, including minimally-invasive sternotomies)

Exclusion criteria

* On systemic antibiotics or with an active bacterial infection at the time of surgery * Patients previously enrolled in this trial * Patients known to be colonized with Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)(unethical not to administer glycopeptides), beta-lactam or vancomycin allergy precluding the use of cefazolin or vancomycin, respectively, or to silver precluding the use of Prevena * Participation in other studies that may interfere with this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to the wound management systemPrevena or standard wound dressing applied after surgery as per protocol, assessed up to 90 days after surgerygoal is \>90%
Adherence to the antibiotic regimenCefazolin: within an hour of surgery; one intra-operative dose at 4 hours after the first dose or upon wound closure (whatever comes first); two post-operative doses q8h. Vancomycin: initially intravenously; second dose 12 hrs after the first dose.goal is \>90%
Loss of follow-upup to 90 days after surgerygoal is \<10%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality in patients with an active infectionup to 90 days after surgeryusing standardized CDC/NHSN (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network) definitions
ICU (Intensive Care Unit) and hospital stayLength of ICU - from date of surgery to initial ICU discharge date, assessed up to 90 days after surgery. Hospital Stay - date of surgery to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days after surgery.length
Deep incisional and organ/space sternal-surgical site infection (s-SSI)up to 90 days after surgeryusing standardized CDC/NHSN (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network) definitions
Acute kidney injurywithin 7 days of surgeryBased on serum creatinine, following Acute Kidney Injury Network definition
Pain on day 7Pain at Day 7 (+/- 1 day)Visual analog scale (VAS)
Wound dehiscenceup to 90 days after surgeryusing standardized CDC/NHSN (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network) definitions
C. difficile infectionup to 90 days after surgerylaboratory confirmed

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026