Rate of Complete Resection in a Unique Surgical Time
Conditions
Keywords
hysteroscopic myomectomy, 26Fr resector, 18.5Fr resector
Brief summary
Hysteroscopic resection of type 0, 1 or 2 myoma is frequent. The more frequent resector used for myoma resection is 26Fr hysteroscope. Actual miniaturization of resector led to 18.5Fr resector with a potential benefit because of less dilatation. These resectors are often used but no scientific evaluation has been performed. Hypothesis of this non inferiority trial is that complete resection in a unique surgical time will be comparable with both resectors.
Detailed description
Myoma type 0, 1 or 2 are often symptomatic (abnormal uterine bleeding or infertility) and hysteroscopic resections are thus frequent. This management is a minimally invasive surgery. Usually, a 26Fr resectoscope is used and the main articles on this topic report hysteroscopie resections with a 26Fr resectoscope. Miniaturization of resector led to decrease in the size of resectors with a potential benefit because of a less important cervical dilatation and then a smaller risk of adverse events and an increase in the number of surgery under local anaesthesia. Use of 18.5Fr resectors is more and more frequent but, to our knowledge, it has never been evaluated for benefit on cervical dilatation but also for rate of complete resection in one time, surgical length and rate of unbalanced input/output. Intuitively, a smaller diameter could led to a less traumatic cervical dilatation but it could also led to an higher risk of incomplete treatment in one time and a longer surgical duration and a more frequent unbalanced input/output. No study compare use of these two resectors (18.5 and 26Fr) all the more randomized. With 26Fr resector, the rate of complete resection in one time for less than 3cm myoma is around 90%. If this rate is higher with the 18.5Fr resector, the risk/benefit balance (including economic evaluation) won't be favorable to this use.
Interventions
hysteroscopic myomectomy with a 18.5 Fr resector after cervical dilatation until Hegar bougie number 7
hysteroscopic myomectomy with a 26Fr resector after cervical dilatation until Hegar bougie number 10
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Randomized trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Older than 18 years old * With a type 0,1 or 2 unique myoma requiring surgery
Exclusion criteria
* No medical care
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison with chi square test of rate of complete surgery in one time | 3 years | Complete resection of myoma in one time |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of surgery | 3 years | Comparison of duration of surgery between 2 arms |
| Rate of unbalanced in and out balance | 3 years | Comparison of rate of unbalanced in and out balance between the 2 groups. A in/out balance higher than 500cc will be consider has unbalanced). |
| Cost effectiveness analyses | 3 years | Comparison of cost for complete resection of myoma between groups |
| Complications rate | 3 years | Comparison of complications rate (including cervical complications) |
| Use of a 26Fr resector | 3 years | Report of the rate of use of a 26Fr resector in the 18.5Fr group |
Countries
France