Skip to content

Effects of Low Versus High Frequency Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Chronic Neck Pain Patients.

Comparison and Effects of Low and High Frequency Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03401905
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-01-17
Start date
2018-02-09
Completion date
2018-04-09
Last updated
2018-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain, Chronic Pain, Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Keywords

Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, Myofascial trigger point

Brief summary

Comparison between high and low frequency percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as treatment of myofascial chronic neck pain. The main hypothesis is that low frequency treatment will have more hypoalgesic effects than high frequency, and low frequency effects will last longer.

Interventions

PROCEDURELow frequency

A dry needling on trapezius muscle is performed, until two local twitch responses are obtained. The needle is kept inside the trigger point, as it will be the negative electrode, and an adhesive electrode will be added as the positive one. After that, a low frequency TENS is applied, at 2 Hz frequency and 120 microseconds of pulse width.

A dry needling on trapezius muscle is performed, until two local twitch responses are obtained. The needle is kept inside the trigger point, as it will be the negative electrode, and an adhesive electrode will be added as the positive one. After that, a high frequency TENS is applied, at 12o Hz frequency and 200 microseconds of pulse width.

Sponsors

Centro Universitario La Salle
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomized list that was only known by the therapist. Subjects do not know about the treatment they were receiving.

Intervention model description

Double blind randomized control trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Neck pain of more than 6 months of evolution. * Pain level of more than 30 millimeter on the VAS scale. * Active myofascial frigger points on upper trapezius muscle.

Exclusion criteria

* Upper limb radiculopathy. * Recent whiplash. * Cervicogenic dizziness. * Migraine. * Previous cervical surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PainChanges on pain will be assessed during one month follow up. Baseline will be measured on the first day and one month later pain score will be reassessed.Subjective feeling expressed by subjects in the area of discomfort. It will be measured by a Visual Analogue Scale, meaning a score of 0 points/centimiters no pain and a score of 10 points/centimiters unbearable pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure pain thresholdChanges on pain will be assessed during one month follow up. Baseline will be measured on the first day and one month later pain score will be reassessed.Minimal amount of pressure that induces pain. An algometer will be used to measure pressure pain threshold. Units will be kilograms per square centimeter. The higher the score is, the less sensitive the area will be.
Neck disability index.Pre treatment at the beginning of the study and one month later, on the last of the follow up period.Ten items questionnaire designed to asses the level of pain and self-assessment of cervical disability. The NDI (Spanish version) is composed of 10 questions related to daily functional activities. NDI presents an acceptable reliability with an intraclass correlation coeffcient (ICC) ranging from 0.50 to 0.98. It has been proposed that the clinically important difference required for NDI is seven points.
kinesiofobiaPre treatment at the beginning of the study and one month later, on the last of the follow up period.Eleven items questionnaire designed to asses pain-related fear. TSK-11, Spanish version.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026