Skip to content

Clinical Concordance Study Between Watson for Oncology and Clinician Practice

A Retrospective, Self - Controlled, Single - Center Clinical Concordance Study Between Watson for Oncology and Clinician Practice

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03400514
Acronym
W001
Enrollment
350
Registered
2018-01-17
Start date
2017-04-12
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2018-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Artificial Intelligence, Cancer

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, concordance

Brief summary

At present, Watson for Oncology has been applied in 14 countries worldwide, including China, the United States, Holland, Thailand, India, Korea, Poland, Slovakia and Bangladesh. In a double-blind study involving 362 patients in India, treatment recommendations from Watson for Oncology (WFO) performed a high degree of consistency with their multidisciplinary tumor board. The investigators would recruit cancer patients diagnosed as lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer,cervical cancer or ovarian cancer according to the criteria of Watson for Oncology ,using the updated version of Watson for Oncology to explore the concordance of therapeutic regimen between WFO and physicians in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.

Detailed description

This study was approved by the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University ethics committee.The investigators would randomly selected cancer patients, including lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer,rectal cancer,cervical cancer and ovarian cancer patients, from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University database according to the criteria of Watson for Oncology(supplementary materials). Case data would be extracted and input into the Watson system. WFO provided therapeutic recommendations in three categories: recommended, for consideration, and not recommended. Data would be analyzed retrospectively to compare the WFO's recommendations and actual therapeutic regimen in the hospital. Some actual regimen applications that were not available in WFO will be defined as physician's choice. Overall, physician's recommendations would be defined as concordant with WFO if they corresponded to the recommended or consideration categories and as non-concordant if they corresponded to the not recommended or not available categories.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Qingdao University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* a histology of lung cancer,breast cancer,gastric cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer,cervical cancer and ovarian cancer * had no prior systemic therapy and need neoadjuvant/adjuvant or metastatic therapy * had prior neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy and/or surgery and are now metastatic * have had prior surgery and now need adjuvant therapy * seeking an additional therapy whose cancer has progressed beyond its initial metastatic therapy (second line)

Exclusion criteria

* not have confirmed diagnoses of invasive cancer * under 18 years of age * pregnant * with multiple concurrent primary cancers or a local recurrence or a new primary at the same site of a previously treated cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
concordanceDay 0the concordance of therapeutic regimen between WFO and physicians in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactNa Zhou
zhounabb0912@126.com+86053282913207

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026