Peri-implant Mucositis
Conditions
Keywords
topical, subgingival, simvastatin
Brief summary
This study seeks to test the recently discovered anti-inflammatory action of statins on inflamed mucosa surrounding dental implants. Hypothesis: The application of 1.2% simvastatin gel will decrease peri-implant inflammation. The pilot study will involve 44 subjects divided into a test and control group. The test group shall receive topical simvastatin gel administered around the implant with a blunt tipped needle. The control group will receive a placebo. Inflammatory state shall be determined at baseline as well as follow up visits at 24 hours, 1 week, and 1 month by clinical indices of inflammation as well as biochemical markers of inflammation gathered from around the implants.
Detailed description
Following signing the consent document the following will occur: 1. Screening Patients will complete standard medical and dental health history forms, followed by a study specific screening questionnaire. if the patient is deemed eligible, the patient will be examined clinically. The clinical examination will include diagnostic procedures typical of an implant recall visit. Initially, the sulcus will be probed with a periodontal probe; if bleeding on probing is elicited, then a radiograph will be made. The following shall be done to screen the patients: 1. Periapical radiographs of the implant to determine bone loss, if bone loss is found the patient will be excluded from the study. 2. Bleeding on probing will be assessed by using a periodontal probe passed along the gingival crevice, and bleeding scores will be assessed passing the probe with a force of 0.25 N. 3. If a woman is of childbearing age and suspected of being pregnant, a urine pregnancy test shall be made at this time. If the patient exhibits no bleeding on probing, or signs of mesial/distal bone loss greater than 1mm from the accepted reference point on the implant system the patient will be excluded from the study. 2. Subject allocation Subjects will be assigned with equal allocation into the following groups: 1. Test group: will receive 0.1 ml prepared Simvastatin in 1.2% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri-implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula. 2. Control group: will receive a placebo of 0.1 ml 40% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula. 3. Baseline measurements Baseline measurements will be made at least 48 hours after screening (allowing time for complete hemostasis of peri-implant crevicular mucosa after bleeding induced by probing in the screening visit). Following baseline measurements, Test and Control interventions will be administered. The baseline measurements include the following: 1. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) collection: Each implant site will be isolated with cotton rolls and light air will be applied over the side to eliminate ambient salivary contamination of the PICF sample. Sampling will be done using paper strips that are inserted with cotton forceps into the gingival crevice until mild resistance is felt. After gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collection, the volumes are immediately quantified using the Periotron 8000 instrument. 2. Gingival Index: Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site, the scores will be summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score. 3. Probing depth: Measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, distolingual, midlingual, and mesiolingual. 4. Administration of test and control intervention will be delivered into the peri- implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula following baseline measurements. 0.1ml of gel will be administered with a blunt cannula evenly distributed in the peri-implant sulcus. The investigator will not know whether the subject is receiving the active or control intervention. 5. Recall appointments and measurements Both Test and Control subjects will be scheduled recall visits. Recalls will be done at 24 hours (+ or - 3 hours), 1 week (+ or - 12 hours), and 1 month (+ or - 11 days). On each recall visit, the following procedures will take place: 1. PICF collection: procedures identical to those performed on the baseline visit 2. Gingival index recording: Identical to that performed on the baseline visit 3. probing depth measurement : procedures identical to that performed at the baseline visit \* these measurements will be made by a blinded investigator 6. Cytokine analysis Due to study constraints, not all PICF samples collected from subjects will be analyzed in the pilot study. The samples that will be analyzed will be selected randomly from the study population. Cytokine samples from only 13 randomly selected subjects from the test group, as well as 13 randomly selected subjects from the control group will be analyzed. Of these randomly selected samples, only those collected at baseline, 24 hours, and at 1 week will be analyzed. The remaining cytokine samples will be evaluated as part of a later study. Cytokine quantities will be determined using; a commercial 22 multipixed fluorescent bead based immunoassay and luminex 100 IS instrument. The kit used is the MILLIPLEX map Human Cytokine/ Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel- Immunology Multiplex Assay (HCYTOMAG-60K) capable of detecting IL-1Beta;, TNF-Alpha;, IL-6, IL-8. The study in total will take 1 month and 2 days. All visits will generally take 0.5-1.5 hours. No long term follow up will be required.
Interventions
One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice
One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Only the study coordinator will know whether the intervention is simvastatin or control.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Read, understand, and sign the informed consent forms * Have at least 1 dental implant * Have no evidence of peri-implantitis as evidenced by mesial and distal bone loss more than 1 mm from the accepted reference point round the implants on the periapical radiograph * Demonstrate peri-implant mucositis as evidenced by bleeding on probing with 0.25 N/cm
Exclusion criteria
* Have allergic reactions to simvastatin * Have peri-implantitis as evidenced by more than 1 mm of mesial and distal bone loss from an accepted reference point on the implants on the periapical radiograph * Demonstrate no bleeding on probing with 0.25 N/ cm * Have uncontrolled systemic disease * Pregnancy or females who suspect/may be pregnant, as well as nursing and breast feeding mothers * Take statin / HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor medications * Smokers * Require antibiotic prophylaxis * Take anti-inflammatory medication, immunosuppressive medications or immunosuppressed patients * Have paraben allergies * Have soybean allergies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week | 24hrs - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week | 24 hours - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours | Baseline - 24 hours | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week | Baseline - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week | 24 hours - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours | Baseline- 24hrs | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week | Baseline - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours | Baseline- 24hrs | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week | Baseline - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week | 24 hours - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours | Baseline - 24 hours | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
| Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week | Baseline - 1 week | Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | 24 hours | Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score. |
| Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | 1 week | Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score. |
| Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Baseline | Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing. |
| Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | 24 hours | Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing. |
| Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | 1 week | Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing. |
| Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Baseline | Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Test Group Will receive 0.1 ml prepared Simvastatin in 1.2% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri-implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula.
Simvastatin: One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice | 24 |
| Control Group Will receive a placebo of 0.1 ml 40% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri-implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula.
Placebo: One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice | 22 |
| Total | 46 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Test Group | Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.45 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 | 63.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 | 63.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 24 participants | 22 participants | 46 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 17 Participants | 13 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants | 9 Participants | 16 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 22 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 22 |
Outcome results
Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: 24 hours - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week | 3.577 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 14.137 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week | -2.108 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 10.569 |
Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week | 2.5016 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 15.4701 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week | -1.095 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 8.605 |
Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline- 24hrs
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours | -1.075 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 15.587 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours | 1.013 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 5.273 |
Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: 24 hours - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week | 0.185 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 2.039 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week | 0.073 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 1.522 |
Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline - 24 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours | 0.118 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 0.954 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours | 0.201 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week | 0.304 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 1.3744 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week | 0.275 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 1.296 |
Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: 24 hours - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week | 168.894 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 548.154 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week | -44.42 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 484.019 |
Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week | 131.368 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 480.835 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week | 20.275 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 389.666 |
Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline - 24 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours | 0.00 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 331.021 |
| Control Group | Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours | 64.696 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 197.902 |
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: 24hrs - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week | 1.641 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 5.7217 |
| Control Group | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week | 0.095 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 3.633 |
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline - 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week | 1.5833 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 5.665 |
| Control Group | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week | -0.0704 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 2.8536401 |
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours
Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Time frame: Baseline- 24hrs
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours | 37.526 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 1.266 |
| Control Group | Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours | -0.17 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) | Standard Deviation 1.589 |
Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week
Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.
Time frame: 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1 | 2 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1.50 | 4 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1.25 | 17 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1.75 | 0 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 0.50 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1.75 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 0.50 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1.25 | 17 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week | Gingival sscore of 1.50 | 3 participants |
Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours
Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.
Time frame: 24 hours
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1 | 16 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1.50 | 1 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1.25 | 6 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1.75 | 0 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 0.50 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1.75 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 0.50 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1 | 4 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1.25 | 12 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours | Gingival sscore of 1.50 | 5 participants |
Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline
Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1 | 0 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1.5 | 4 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1.25 | 18 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1.75 | 1 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 0.50 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1.75 | 2 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 0.50 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1.25 | 12 participants |
| Control Group | Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline | Gingival index score of 1.5 | 8 participants |
Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week
Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.
Time frame: 1 week
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth Score 1 | 1 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth Score 2 | 4 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 3 | 8 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 4 | 7 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 5 | 4 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 6 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 5 | 2 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth Score 1 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 4 | 3 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth Score 2 | 4 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 6 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week | Probing Depth 3 | 13 participants |
Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours
Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.
Time frame: 24 hours
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth Score 1 | 1 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth Score 2 | 5 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 3 | 7 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 4 | 8 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 5 | 2 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 6 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 5 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth Score 1 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 4 | 6 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth Score 2 | 5 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 6 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours | Probing Depth 3 | 10 participants |
Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline
Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth Score 1 | 0 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth Score 2 | 3 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 3 | 9 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 4 | 9 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 5 | 3 participants |
| Simvastatin Group ( Treatment ) | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 6 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 5 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth Score 1 | 1 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 4 | 6 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth Score 2 | 5 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 6 | 0 participants |
| Control Group | Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline | Probing Depth 3 | 10 participants |