Skip to content

Use of Topical Subgingival Application of Simvastatin Gel in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis

The Use of Topical Subgingival Application of Simvastatin Gel in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03400475
Enrollment
46
Registered
2018-01-17
Start date
2015-04-23
Completion date
2016-10-24
Last updated
2018-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-implant Mucositis

Keywords

topical, subgingival, simvastatin

Brief summary

This study seeks to test the recently discovered anti-inflammatory action of statins on inflamed mucosa surrounding dental implants. Hypothesis: The application of 1.2% simvastatin gel will decrease peri-implant inflammation. The pilot study will involve 44 subjects divided into a test and control group. The test group shall receive topical simvastatin gel administered around the implant with a blunt tipped needle. The control group will receive a placebo. Inflammatory state shall be determined at baseline as well as follow up visits at 24 hours, 1 week, and 1 month by clinical indices of inflammation as well as biochemical markers of inflammation gathered from around the implants.

Detailed description

Following signing the consent document the following will occur: 1. Screening Patients will complete standard medical and dental health history forms, followed by a study specific screening questionnaire. if the patient is deemed eligible, the patient will be examined clinically. The clinical examination will include diagnostic procedures typical of an implant recall visit. Initially, the sulcus will be probed with a periodontal probe; if bleeding on probing is elicited, then a radiograph will be made. The following shall be done to screen the patients: 1. Periapical radiographs of the implant to determine bone loss, if bone loss is found the patient will be excluded from the study. 2. Bleeding on probing will be assessed by using a periodontal probe passed along the gingival crevice, and bleeding scores will be assessed passing the probe with a force of 0.25 N. 3. If a woman is of childbearing age and suspected of being pregnant, a urine pregnancy test shall be made at this time. If the patient exhibits no bleeding on probing, or signs of mesial/distal bone loss greater than 1mm from the accepted reference point on the implant system the patient will be excluded from the study. 2. Subject allocation Subjects will be assigned with equal allocation into the following groups: 1. Test group: will receive 0.1 ml prepared Simvastatin in 1.2% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri-implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula. 2. Control group: will receive a placebo of 0.1 ml 40% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula. 3. Baseline measurements Baseline measurements will be made at least 48 hours after screening (allowing time for complete hemostasis of peri-implant crevicular mucosa after bleeding induced by probing in the screening visit). Following baseline measurements, Test and Control interventions will be administered. The baseline measurements include the following: 1. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) collection: Each implant site will be isolated with cotton rolls and light air will be applied over the side to eliminate ambient salivary contamination of the PICF sample. Sampling will be done using paper strips that are inserted with cotton forceps into the gingival crevice until mild resistance is felt. After gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collection, the volumes are immediately quantified using the Periotron 8000 instrument. 2. Gingival Index: Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site, the scores will be summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score. 3. Probing depth: Measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, distolingual, midlingual, and mesiolingual. 4. Administration of test and control intervention will be delivered into the peri- implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula following baseline measurements. 0.1ml of gel will be administered with a blunt cannula evenly distributed in the peri-implant sulcus. The investigator will not know whether the subject is receiving the active or control intervention. 5. Recall appointments and measurements Both Test and Control subjects will be scheduled recall visits. Recalls will be done at 24 hours (+ or - 3 hours), 1 week (+ or - 12 hours), and 1 month (+ or - 11 days). On each recall visit, the following procedures will take place: 1. PICF collection: procedures identical to those performed on the baseline visit 2. Gingival index recording: Identical to that performed on the baseline visit 3. probing depth measurement : procedures identical to that performed at the baseline visit \* these measurements will be made by a blinded investigator 6. Cytokine analysis Due to study constraints, not all PICF samples collected from subjects will be analyzed in the pilot study. The samples that will be analyzed will be selected randomly from the study population. Cytokine samples from only 13 randomly selected subjects from the test group, as well as 13 randomly selected subjects from the control group will be analyzed. Of these randomly selected samples, only those collected at baseline, 24 hours, and at 1 week will be analyzed. The remaining cytokine samples will be evaluated as part of a later study. Cytokine quantities will be determined using; a commercial 22 multipixed fluorescent bead based immunoassay and luminex 100 IS instrument. The kit used is the MILLIPLEX map Human Cytokine/ Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel- Immunology Multiplex Assay (HCYTOMAG-60K) capable of detecting IL-1Beta;, TNF-Alpha;, IL-6, IL-8. The study in total will take 1 month and 2 days. All visits will generally take 0.5-1.5 hours. No long term follow up will be required.

Interventions

DRUGSimvastatin

One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice

OTHERPlacebo

One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice

Sponsors

Greater New York Academy of Prosthodontics
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
American College of Prosthodontists Education Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
Ahmed Mohamed Mahrous
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Only the study coordinator will know whether the intervention is simvastatin or control.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Read, understand, and sign the informed consent forms * Have at least 1 dental implant * Have no evidence of peri-implantitis as evidenced by mesial and distal bone loss more than 1 mm from the accepted reference point round the implants on the periapical radiograph * Demonstrate peri-implant mucositis as evidenced by bleeding on probing with 0.25 N/cm

Exclusion criteria

* Have allergic reactions to simvastatin * Have peri-implantitis as evidenced by more than 1 mm of mesial and distal bone loss from an accepted reference point on the implants on the periapical radiograph * Demonstrate no bleeding on probing with 0.25 N/ cm * Have uncontrolled systemic disease * Pregnancy or females who suspect/may be pregnant, as well as nursing and breast feeding mothers * Take statin / HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor medications * Smokers * Require antibiotic prophylaxis * Take anti-inflammatory medication, immunosuppressive medications or immunosuppressed patients * Have paraben allergies * Have soybean allergies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week24hrs - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week24 hours - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 HoursBaseline - 24 hoursMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 WeekBaseline - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week24 hours - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 HoursBaseline- 24hrsMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 WeekBaseline - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 HoursBaseline- 24hrsMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 WeekBaseline - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week24 hours - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 HoursBaseline - 24 hoursMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)
Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 WeekBaseline - 1 weekMeasuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours24 hoursUsing the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.
Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week1 weekUsing the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.
Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineBaselineDepth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.
Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours24 hoursDepth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.
Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week1 weekDepth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.
Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineBaselineUsing the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Test Group
Will receive 0.1 ml prepared Simvastatin in 1.2% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri-implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula. Simvastatin: One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice
24
Control Group
Will receive a placebo of 0.1 ml 40% (W/V) Lecithin/isopropyl palmitate solution (Lipoil®), Poloxamer 407 gel (Polox Gel 20%®) applied topically into the peri-implant gingival sulcus using a plastic syringe with a blunt cannula. Placebo: One topical application in peri-implant gingival crevice
22
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTest GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Continuous63.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants22 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants13 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 240 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: 24 hours - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week3.577 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 14.137
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 1 B 24 Hours - 1 Week-2.108 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 10.569
p-value: 0.9Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week2.5016 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 15.4701
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 1 Week-1.095 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 8.605
p-value: 0.9Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline- 24hrs

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours-1.075 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 15.587
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 1 B at Base to 24 Hours1.013 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 5.273
p-value: 0.9Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: 24 hours - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week0.185 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 2.039
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 6 24 Hours - 1 Week0.073 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 1.522
p-value: 0.9Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline - 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours0.118 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 0.954
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 6 at Base to 24 Hours0.201 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 0.88
p-value: 0.9Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week0.304 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 1.3744
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 6 Baseline to 1 Week0.275 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 1.296
p-value: 0.9Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: 24 hours - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week168.894 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 548.154
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 8 24 Hours to 1 Week-44.42 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 484.019
p-value: 0.86Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week131.368 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 480.835
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 8 at Base to 1 Week20.275 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 389.666
p-value: 0.86Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline - 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours0.00 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 331.021
Control GroupChange in Interleukin 8 at Base to 24 Hours64.696 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 197.902
p-value: 0.86Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: 24hrs - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week1.641 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 5.7217
Control GroupChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha 24 Hours to 1 Week0.095 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 3.633
p-value: 0.41Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline - 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week1.5833 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 5.665
Control GroupChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 1 Week-0.0704 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 2.8536401
p-value: 0.41Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours

Measuring the change in Cytokine levels in the peri implant crevicular fluid ( Fluid around the implant) by extracting the fluid and measuring the levels of the interlukins in the fluids in Micrograms per dicileter ( ug/dl)

Time frame: Baseline- 24hrs

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours37.526 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 1.266
Control GroupChange in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Base to 24 Hours-0.17 Micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl)Standard Deviation 1.589
p-value: 0.41Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 Week

Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 12 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 1.504 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 1.2517 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 1.750 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 0.501 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 1.750 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 0.501 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 11 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 1.2517 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 1 WeekGingival sscore of 1.503 participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 Hours

Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 116 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 1.501 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 1.256 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 1.750 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 0.501 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 1.750 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 0.501 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 14 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 1.2512 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at 24 HoursGingival sscore of 1.505 participants
p-value: 0.071Fisher Exact
Secondary

Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at Baseline

Using the Gingival index by Loe and Sillness 1963, the inflammatory state of the Buccal, Lingual, Mesial and Distal Surfaces of the gingiva will be scored using the following score system: 0= normal gingival without signs of inflammation, no inflammation, no bleeding 1. minor inflammation , slight discoloration, minor surface alterations, no bleeding 2. moderate inflammation, redness, swelling, bleeding upon probing and under pressure 3. strong inflammation, strong redness and swelling, tendency toward spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations After a score is given to each site the scores are summed together and divided by 4 to reach an overall score.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 10 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 1.54 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 1.2518 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 1.751 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Gingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 0.501 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 1.752 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 0.500 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 10 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 1.2512 participants
Control GroupGingival Index Level (Derived From an Average Over the 4 Implant Sites) at BaselineGingival index score of 1.58 participants
p-value: 0.071Fisher Exact
Secondary

Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 Week

Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth Score 11 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth Score 24 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 38 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 47 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 54 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 60 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 52 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth Score 10 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 43 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth Score 24 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 60 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 1 WeekProbing Depth 313 participants
p-value: 0.34Fisher Exact
Secondary

Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 Hours

Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth Score 11 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth Score 25 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 37 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 48 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 52 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 61 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 51 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth Score 10 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 46 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth Score 25 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 60 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at 24 HoursProbing Depth 310 participants
p-value: 0.54Fisher Exact
Secondary

Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at Baseline

Depth will be measured by a calibrated periodontal probe at 6 different locations, Mesiobuccal, Mid Buccal, Distobuccal, Disto Lingual, Mid Lingual and Mesio Lingual. The longitudinal course will be characterized with respect to the categorical outcome, presence of any bleeding on probing, with initial emphasis being placed upon transition approaches, with specific attention given to shifts from clinically unacceptable to clinically acceptable designations. probing depth is considered variable from one person to the other however a decrease or a shallower probing depth overtime is gererally seen as an improvement , thus any decrease in probing depth would be seen as signs of healing.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth Score 10 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth Score 23 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 39 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 49 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 53 participants
Simvastatin Group ( Treatment )Probing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 60 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 50 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth Score 11 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 46 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth Score 25 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 60 participants
Control GroupProbing Depth Level (Averaged Over 6 Sites) at BaselineProbing Depth 310 participants
p-value: 0.062Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026