Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03400059
Enrollment
144
Registered
2018-01-17
Start date
2018-03-22
Completion date
2022-08-01
Last updated
2025-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Migraine

Keywords

Prophylaxis, Headache, Preventative Treatment

Brief summary

The efficacy of intranasal kinetic oscillation stimulation using the Chordate System S211 as a preventative treatment will be examined in patients diagnosed with chronic migraine. The medical device system will be applied in 6 treatments at weekly intervals. The study will examine the effects on monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical investigation of a medical device. The study consists of a 4-week screening period, a 6-week treatment period (2 weeks run-in and a 4-week observation window to assess the treatment effect), and a 4-week follow-up period. The study primarily aims at evaluating the effect of intranasal kinetic oscillation stimulation using the Chordate System S211 as a preventative treatment on monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity.

Interventions

DEVICEChordate System S211 in treatment mode

Chordate System S211 in treatment mode

DEVICEChordate System S211 in placebo mode

Chordate System S211 in placebo mode

Sponsors

Vinnova
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
FGK Clinical Research GmbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Chordate Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject is legally competent, has been informed of the nature, the scope and the relevance of the study, voluntarily agrees to participation and the study's provisions, and has duly signed the informed consent form (ICF); 2. Male or female aged between 18 and 65 years (inclusive) at the time of providing informed consent; 3. Diagnosed as suffering from chronic migraine with or without aura (≥15 headache days per month for more than 3 months before screening including at least 8 migraine days) according to the IHS classification (International Classification of Headache Disorders \[ICHD\]-III beta); 4. Migraine onset before the age of 60 years; 5. Reported history of migraine for at least 1 year before screening; 6. Reported stable prophylactic migraine medication regimen, if any, during the 3 months prior to screening; 7. Able and willing to maintain current prophylactic migraine medication regimen (no change in type, frequency or dose) from screening to end of follow-up; 8. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use highly effective contraceptive methods (failure rate \<1% per year when used consistently and correctly) during the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Unable to distinguish between migraine headaches and other headache types; 2. Treatment with Botox in the head/neck area within 4 months of the screening visit, or planned Botox treatment during the study; 3. Previous or ongoing treatment with an implanted stimulator or other implanted device in the head and/or neck; 4. Known pronounced anterior septal deviation, or other known relevant abnormality in the nasal cavity, including bacterial infection and wounds; 5. History of relevant sinus surgery, transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary or other lesions or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea; 6. Fitted with a pacemaker/defibrillator; 7. Previously treated with therapeutic x-ray intervention in the facial region (that could have influenced the nasal mucosa); 8. Ongoing upper respiratory infection or malignancy in the nasal cavity; 9. History of regular nose bleeding (epistaxis), or concomitant condition or medication that could cause excessive bleeding including treatment with an anticoagulant; 10. Head injury or open wound that contraindicates use of the Chordate Headband; 11. Known allergy to polyvinylchloride, a material used in the Chordate Catheter, or medicinal liquid paraffin; 12. Concurrent condition or risk of non-compliance that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect the interpretation of performance or safety data or which otherwise contraindicates participation in a clinical investigation; 13. Pregnant and lactating women; 14. Participation in a clinical investigation within 3 months of enrolment or planned participation at any time during this clinical investigation; 15. Previous participation in this study; 16. Employees of the study site or the sponsor directly involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of any such individuals.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42Least square mean change from Baseline (4-week screening period) in monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity in 4-week performance assessment period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine DaysInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine DaysInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All IntensitiesInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All IntensitiesInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment PeriodInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up PeriodInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment PeriodInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up PeriodInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up PeriodInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up PeriodInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Headache Impact TestDays -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)The headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) is a 6-item self-administered questionnaire that evaluates the extent of disability a subject experiences due to headache by measuring the subject's level of pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The final total score is obtained from simple summation of the 6 items. The total score ranges between 36 and 78, with larger scores reflecting greater impact. Reported is the change from Baseline in the final total score at the respective visit.
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - RestrictiveDays -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)The role function-restrictive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines limit daily activities and interactions during the past 4 weeks. It includes 7 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function restrictive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function restrictive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.
MSQ - Role Function - PreventiveDays -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)The role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines prevent from engaging in daily activities during the past 4 weeks. It includes 4 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function-preventive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.
MSQ - Emotional FunctionDays -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)The emotional function dimension of the MSQ assesses the emotional impact of migraines during the past 4 weeks. It includes 3 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the emotional function dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the emotional function dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Days -28 (screening), 0 (visit 1), 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (Follow-up)The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the subject's impression of disease severity. The subjects rated the severity of their condition on a scale from 1 to 4: 1=normal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 70n (%) of patients
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment PeriodInterval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Countries

Finland, Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Treatment
Chordate System S211 in treatment mode: Chordate System S211 in treatment mode
76
Sham Treatment
Chordate System S211 in placebo mode: Chordate System S211 in placebo mode
68
Total144

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
76 Participants67 Participants143 Participants
Age, Continuous48 years46 years48 years
BMI26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
25.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
25.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Arabian (Jordan)
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
75 Participants68 Participants143 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
25 participants22 participants47 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
51 participants46 participants97 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants57 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 760 / 68
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 7641 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 760 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.

Least square mean change from Baseline (4-week screening period) in monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity in 4-week performance assessment period.

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.-3.45 change in daysStandard Error 0.62
Sham TreatmentMean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.-1.22 change in daysStandard Error 0.62
p-value: 0.013295% CI: [-4.11, -0.49]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentChange in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period-2.490 change in daysStandard Deviation 4.26
Sham TreatmentChange in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period-0.660 change in daysStandard Deviation 5.552
p-value: 0.0152Van-Elteren
Secondary

Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentChange in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period-2.016 change in daysStandard Deviation 4.565
Sham TreatmentChange in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period-0.857 change in daysStandard Deviation 4.721
p-value: 0.066Van-Elteren
Secondary

Headache Impact Test

The headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) is a 6-item self-administered questionnaire that evaluates the extent of disability a subject experiences due to headache by measuring the subject's level of pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The final total score is obtained from simple summation of the 6 items. The total score ranges between 36 and 78, with larger scores reflecting greater impact. Reported is the change from Baseline in the final total score at the respective visit.

Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

Population: assessments of individual subjects missing at some visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentHeadache Impact TestVisit 3-2.6 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 5.2
Active TreatmentHeadache Impact TestVisit 7-4.1 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 6.8
Active TreatmentHeadache Impact TestFollow-up visit-3.8 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 7.4
Sham TreatmentHeadache Impact TestVisit 3-1.5 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 3.1
Sham TreatmentHeadache Impact TestVisit 7-2.2 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 4.8
Sham TreatmentHeadache Impact TestFollow-up visit-1.7 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

n (%) of patients

Time frame: Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 70

Population: SAF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent adverse event48 Participants
Active TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent adverse event related to medical device2 Participants
Active TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)any serious treatment emergent adverse event1 Participants
Active TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent adverse event related to procedure17 Participants
Active TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event49 Participants
Sham TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent adverse event related to procedure13 Participants
Sham TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event41 Participants
Sham TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent adverse event41 Participants
Sham TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)any serious treatment emergent adverse event0 Participants
Sham TreatmentIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent adverse event related to medical device5 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period-3.15 change in daysStandard Error 0.59
Sham TreatmentMean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period-0.47 change in daysStandard Error 0.59
p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-4.32, -1.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities-3.65 change in daysStandard Error 0.62
Sham TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities-1.75 change in daysStandard Error 0.62
p-value: 0.03195% CI: [-3.63, -0.17]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days-3.72 change in daysStandard Error 0.6
Sham TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days-0.85 change in daysStandard Error 0.6
p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-4.54, -1.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities-2.88 change in daysStandard Error 0.57
Sham TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities-1.35 change in daysStandard Error 0.58
p-value: 0.059895% CI: [-3.12, 0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days-3.57 change in daysStandard Error 0.6
Sham TreatmentMean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days-1.17 change in daysStandard Error 0.6
p-value: 0.004895% CI: [-4.06, -0.73]ANCOVA
Secondary

Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - Restrictive

The role function-restrictive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines limit daily activities and interactions during the past 4 weeks. It includes 7 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function restrictive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function restrictive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

Population: assessments of individual subjects missing at some visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMigraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - RestrictiveVisit 37.4 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 16.3
Active TreatmentMigraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - RestrictiveVisit 713.3 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 19.9
Active TreatmentMigraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - RestrictiveFollow-up11.9 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 21.4
Sham TreatmentMigraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - RestrictiveVisit 35.4 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 11.2
Sham TreatmentMigraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - RestrictiveVisit 77.5 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 17
Sham TreatmentMigraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - RestrictiveFollow-up4.9 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 19.8
Secondary

MSQ - Emotional Function

The emotional function dimension of the MSQ assesses the emotional impact of migraines during the past 4 weeks. It includes 3 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the emotional function dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the emotional function dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

Population: assessments of individual subjects missing at some visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMSQ - Emotional FunctionVisit 37.0 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 16.2
Active TreatmentMSQ - Emotional FunctionVisit 710.2 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 23.5
Active TreatmentMSQ - Emotional FunctionFollow-up11.5 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 25.2
Sham TreatmentMSQ - Emotional FunctionVisit 33.0 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 14.2
Sham TreatmentMSQ - Emotional FunctionVisit 75.8 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 19.2
Sham TreatmentMSQ - Emotional FunctionFollow-up2.5 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 24.7
Secondary

MSQ - Role Function - Preventive

The role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines prevent from engaging in daily activities during the past 4 weeks. It includes 4 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function-preventive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status. Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Time frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

Population: assessments of individual subjects missing at some visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TreatmentMSQ - Role Function - PreventiveVisit 34.2 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 17.4
Active TreatmentMSQ - Role Function - PreventiveVisit 79.2 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 20.8
Active TreatmentMSQ - Role Function - PreventiveFollow-up9.8 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 22.2
Sham TreatmentMSQ - Role Function - PreventiveVisit 30.7 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 10.9
Sham TreatmentMSQ - Role Function - PreventiveVisit 74.8 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 16.6
Sham TreatmentMSQ - Role Function - PreventiveFollow-up-0.7 change in score on a scale from BaselineStandard Deviation 19.8
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the subject's impression of disease severity. The subjects rated the severity of their condition on a scale from 1 to 4: 1=normal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe

Time frame: Days -28 (screening), 0 (visit 1), 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (Follow-up)

Population: assessments of individual subjects missing at some visits

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1Not done2 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3mild13 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningmild7 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3severe12 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1normal21 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7Not done1 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3moderate21 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7normal23 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1mild5 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7mild17 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningmoderate25 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7moderate21 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1moderate22 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7severe6 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningnormal13 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upNot done0 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1severe21 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upnormal22 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningsevere25 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upmild17 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3Not done1 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upmoderate20 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)ScreeningNot done1 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upsevere10 Participants
Active TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3normal22 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upsevere17 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)ScreeningNot done0 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningnormal13 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningmild4 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningmoderate24 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Screeningsevere28 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1Not done1 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1normal20 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1mild6 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1moderate19 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 1severe23 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3Not done1 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3normal24 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3mild9 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3severe14 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7Not done1 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7normal25 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7mild10 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7moderate18 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 7severe13 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upNot done0 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upnormal23 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upmild9 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Follow-upmoderate18 Participants
Sham TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)Visit 3moderate20 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period27 Participants
Sham TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period19 Participants
p-value: 0.1615Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period32 Participants
Sham TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period17 Participants
p-value: 0.0102Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period16 Participants
Sham TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period9 Participants
p-value: 0.13Chi-squared
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period

Time frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period20 Participants
Sham TreatmentProportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period11 Participants
p-value: 0.0798Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026