Spinal Cord Injuries
Conditions
Keywords
shockwave, ESWT
Brief summary
The global prevalence of spinal cord injury is estimated between 236 to 4187/Million. A spontaneous recovery of the sense-motoric function is decreasing with the time after injury and is only seen sporadically after 1 to 2 years. Treatment options are mainly limited to improvement of the quality of life. The present prospective randomized study is intended as a double-blind, placebo controlled multi-center investigation. Patients suffering from chronic paraplegia (lesion between THII and THX, ASIA A = complete central lesion) at least for 1 year after the initial trauma without spontaneous remission of the last 6 months are considered to be included in the study. Meeting the inclusion criteria and signing the informed consent, patients are treated in one of the two study centers. At study inclusion, a baseline evaluation comprising neurological, neurophysiological, functional and clinical investigation is performed. Patients dedicated to the ESWT intervention group will be treated once a week over 6 weeks with local non-invasive low energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (=6 treatments with an electrohydraulic device). The follow-up will include neurological, neurophysiological, clinical as well as functional evaluation at the time points 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Additionally, patients will be provided with a diary for documentation of drug adaptation, grade of spasticity and pain. Those patients dedicated to the Placebo ESWT group, will receive the identical scheme in treatment (but without application of shockwaves) and follow-up as the patients in the ESWT group. However, after positive completion of the study, these patients will be offered ESWT as well.
Interventions
DEVICEESWT
at low energy, shockwaves are applied non-invasively at the injury level and 5 segments up and down of the spinal cord paravertebrally left and right
DEVICEPlacebo ESWT
the ESWT therapy head is positioned at the level of injury and is moved up and down identically as described in the Verum intervention group (ESWT) but without application of shockwaves. The sound which is normally produced by shockwave generation is played by high quality sound recordings in the same amount as in the Verum group
Sponsors
AUVA Trauma Center Meidling
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
prospective randomized controlled double blinded clinical intervention study
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* patients with a spinal cord injury classified as ASIA A between the level of THII to THX (complete central lesion) * at least 1 year after trauma * no signs of spontaneous recovery over the last 6 months * signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* central therapies over the last 6 months (eg stem cells, electro-therapy) * Baclofen pump * Joint contraction lower limb \> 40° (hip or knee) * Body weight \> 135 kg * Body height \> 202 cm * non-compliant patients * Decubital ulcers at grade II or higher * participation in an other clinical trial within the last 6 months * Co-morbidities which make study completion doubtful or impossible * Additional neurological diseases which may lead to further damage to the nerval system * Malignant tumor
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Motor function | 24 weeks | Motor function of the lower limbs assessed by gait analysis tool (Lokomat (R)) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Motor function | 24 weeks | Assessment of levels by the ASIA score ASIA score - a neurologic assessment for patients with spinal cord injury developed by the American Spinal Injury Association. Examination includes the pin-prick discrimination assessment at 28 specific sensory locations bilaterally but also 10 muscles bilaterally. Sensory levels for each dermatome (nt...not testable, 0...absent sensation, 1...present sensation but impaired, 2...normal) Motor function of 5 upper extremity and 5 lower extremity key muscles (0...complete paralysis, 1...palpable or visible contraction, 2...active movement, full range of motion, gravity eliminated, 3...active movement, full range of motion, against gravity, 4...active movement, full range of motion, against gravity and provides some resistance, 5...active movement, full range of motion, against gravity and provides normal resistance, nt...not testable) |
| Spasticity | 24 weeks | Evaluation of spasticity degree assessed by the Tardieu test (muscle resistance to passive movement at both slow and fast speed) 2 measurements are performed: 1. Quality of muscle reaction 2. Angle of muscle reaction 3 speed definitions: 1\) V1 is slow as possible 2) V2 speed of limb falling under gravity 3) V3 moving as fast as possible Quality of Muscle Reaction (scored 0-5); 0 is no resistance to passive ROM to 5 indicating joint is immobile (Some versions scored 0-4). |
| Trunk control | 24 weeks | evaluation of trunk control by the modified functional reach test and Ott test |
| Lung function | 24 weeks | Assessment of lung function by peak flow measurements |
| Quality of life | 24 weeks | Assessed by the disability scale SCIM (spinal cord independence measure); Subscores include self-care (range von 0-20 points), respiration and sphincter management (range from 0-40), and mobility (range from 0-40); In total scale range from 0-100 (0 = total dependence, 100 = complete independence). |
Countries
Austria
Contacts
Primary ContactWolfgang Schaden, MD
Backup ContactRainer Mittermayr, MD
Outcome results
None listed