Endocrown Restoration
Conditions
Brief summary
Use chairside Computer-Aided Design & Computer-Aided Manufacturing(CAD/CAM) system (computer aided design / manufacture), using glass ceramic zirconia enhanced lithium silicate glass ceramics (VITA, SUPRINITY, VS) material, compare the difference of firmness, comfort and durability between two kinds of root canal restoration methods:endocrown and 90° shoulder endocrown. Objective to establish the optimal method and material for the restoration of the teeth with root canal therapy.
Interventions
PROCEDUREendocrown restoration
a cervical margin in the form of a butt joint and a preparation of the pulp chamber that does not extend into the root canals.
PROCEDURE90° shoulder endocrown restoration
a 90°cervical margin in the form of a butt joint and a preparation of the pulp chamber that does not extend into the root canals.
Sponsors
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. 18-60 year old patients with healthy body, the tooth is molar, root tip no obvious damage, no root fracture by X-ray; 2. after complete root canal therapy, the remaining 4 wall intact tooth tissue; 3. after complete root canal therapy, the remaining 3 wall intact tooth tissue; 4. have good oral hygiene habits; 5. agreed to participate in the trial and signed the informed consent form; 6. patients who are not participating in other clinical trials; 7. after completion of the repair, compliance with the USPHS evaluation criteria of marginal density class A cases
Exclusion criteria
1. obvious destruction of the apical tissue and large cysts; 2. severe periodontitis patients; 3. oral malignant tumor patients; 4. radiotherapy patients; 5. pregnant women; 6. patients with mental illness or systemic diseases; 7. people who can not take care of themselves; 8. the researchers believe that is not suitable for the test.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| USPHS criteria for dental restorations assessment | 2 Years | This criteria is composed of three dimensions (biological, functional and esthetic), each consisting of several items that are assessed by clinical and radiographic examination. Some items are evaluated quantitatively, others visually.The score of all items is retained as the overall score of the restoration. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Marginal Adaptation | 2 Years | Clinical reevaluations were so far performed at baseline and 24 months after insertion according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by 2 independent evaluators. A: Crown margin not discernible; probe does not catch; B: Probe catches on crown margin but no gap; gap or chipping on probing, with enamel exposed but polishable; C: Gap or chipping, with dentin or liner exposed ; D: Partial fracture, fracture, luxation. |
| Marginal discoloration | 2 Years | Clinical reevaluations were so far performed at baseline and 24 months after insertion according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by 2 independent evaluators. A: No discoloration on the margin between the restoration and the tooth structure; B: Superficial discoloration on the margin between the restoration and the tooth structure; does not penetrate in pulpal direction; C: Discoloration has penetrated along the margin of the restorative material in pulpal direction. |
| Integrity of restoration | 2 Years | Clinical reevaluations were so far performed at baseline and 24 months after insertion according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by 2 independent evaluators. A: Intact; B: Crack apparent on transillumination; C: Fracture observable; D: Crown lost(state at which interface debond occurred). |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactWenJuan Yan, PHD
Outcome results
None listed