Skip to content

Effectiveness of Intense Pulsed Light for Improving Dry Eye Syndrome

Effectiveness of Intense Pulsed Light for Improving Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03396913
Enrollment
88
Registered
2018-01-11
Start date
2018-01-10
Completion date
2019-08-15
Last updated
2020-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndrome

Keywords

Intense Pulsed Light, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Disease

Brief summary

The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. In the study arm, subjects will undergo 4 treatment sessions, consisting of IPL pulses immediately followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). In the control arm, subjects will undergo the same treatments, except that the IPL pulses will be disabled. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks, as explained in the detailed description.

Detailed description

Outcome measures (tear break-up time,meibography, self-assessed symptoms and close up photos of the lid margins) will be measured at baseline. All subjects will receive 4 treatments at 2 weeks intervals. In each treatment session, a subject allocated to the study group will be treated with intense pulsed light (IPL) administered in the malar region, from tragus to tragus including the nose, 2-3 mm below the lower eyelids. Immediately following the IPL administration, the subject will undergo meibomian gland expression (MGX) in both eyelids of both eyes. Subjects in the control arm will receive exactly the same treatment, except that the IPL administration will be sham. A single follow-up will occur at 10 weeks after the baseline (or 4 weeks after the 4th treatment session). At the follow-up, the changes in the outcome measures will be evaluated, and compared between the two arms. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks: 1st treatment at baseline; 2nd treatment at 2 weeks after baseline; 3rd treatment at 4 weeks after baseline; 4th treatment at 6 weeks after baseline; and a single follow-up at 10 weeks after baseline). Statistically significant differences between the two arms will support the study hypothesis that IPL treatment itself provides relief to both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

Interventions

DEVICEIPL

Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a non-invasive and non-laser light treatment that is FDA-approved for various conditions in dermatology. Subjects will receive a total of 4 IPL treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include applications of 10-15 IPL pulses in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression.

DEVICESham IPL

Sham intense pulsed light (IPL) will be implemented with an IPL device in which all light is blocked by a filter. Subjects will receive a total of 4 sham treatments over the course of the study, at intervals of 2 weeks. Each treatment will include applications of10-15 sham pulses in the malar region and close to the lower eyelids, followed by meibomian gland expression.

PROCEDUREMGX

Meibomian gland expression (MGX) will be implemented by squeezing the meibomian glands with the aid of two Q-tips positioned on either side of the meibomian glands, or with a meibomian gland expressor forceps

Sponsors

Lumenis Be Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Subjects in the study arm will receive a series of IPL pulses using the M22 IPL handpiece. In subjects of the control arm, the device will be disabled. The subject will feel the lightguide on the skin, will hear clicking sounds, but no light will be actually produced by the M22 device. Since during treatment both eyes of the subject will be fully occluded, no subject will be able to see if the treatment is actual or sham. There is no way to completely mask the subjects, since the IPL generally causes slight redness of the skin, and in some patients is may also cause some discomfort

Intervention model description

Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a study arm and a control arm. Subjects in the study arm will be treated with IPL and meibomian gland expression. Subjects in the control arm will be treated with sham and meibomian gland expression.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is able to read, understand and sign an Informed Consent (IC) form * 22-85 years of age * Subject is able and willing to comply with the treatment/follow-up (FU) schedule and requirements * In the study eye, Tear Breakup time (TBUT) ≤ 7 seconds * In the study eye, Meibomian Gland Score (MGS) ≤ 12 * In the study eye, at least 5 non-atrophied meibomian glands in the lower eyelid * Symptoms self-assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire ≥ 23

Exclusion criteria

* Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI * Contact lens wear within the month prior to screening * Unwilling to discontinue use of contact lenses for the duration of the study * Ocular surgery or eyelid surgery, within 6 months prior to screening * Neuro-paralysis in the planned treatment area, within 6 months prior to screening * Other uncontrolled eye disorders affecting the ocular surface, for example active allergies * Current use of punctal plugs * Pre-cancerous lesions, skin cancer or pigmented lesions in the planned treatment area * Uncontrolled infections or uncontrolled immunosuppressive diseases * Subjects with ocular infections, within 6 months prior to screening * Prior history of cold sores or rashes in the perioral area or in the planned treatment area that could be stimulated by light at a wavelength of 560 nm to 1200 nm, including: Herpes simplex 1 & 2, Systemic Lupus erythematosus, and porphyria * Within 3 months prior to screening, use of photosensitive medication and/or herbs that may cause sensitivity to 560-1200 nm light exposure, including: Isotretinoin, Tetracycline, Doxycycline, and St. John's Wort * Over exposure to sun, within 4 weeks prior to screening * Use of prescription eye drops for dry eye, within 7 days prior to screening, excluding artificial tears and glaucoma drops * Radiation therapy to the head or neck, within 12 months prior to screening * Planned radiation therapy, within 8 weeks after the last treatment session * Treatment with chemotherapeutic agent, within 8 weeks prior to screening * Planned chemotherapy, within 8 weeks after the last treatment session * New topical treatments within the area to be treated, or oral therapies, within 3 months prior to screening- except over-the-counter acetaminophen-based analgesics for pain management, new oral omega 3 fatty acid supplements and topical artificial tears * Change in dosage of any systemic medication, within 3 months prior to screening * Anticipated relocation or extensive travel outside of the local study area preventing compliance with follow-up over the study period * Legally blind in either eye * History of migraines, seizures or epilepsy * Facial IPL treatment, within 12 months prior to screening * Any thermal treatment of the eyelids, including Lipiflow, within 6 months prior to screening * Expression of the meibomian glands, within 6 months prior to screening * In either eye, moderate to severe (Grade 3-4) inflammation of the conjunctiva, including: allergic, vernal or giant papillary conjunctivitis * In either eye, severe (Grade 4) inflammation of the eyelid, including: blepharochalasis, staphylococcal blepharitis or seborrheic blepharitis * Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity in either eye (e.g., prior chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, Grade 3 corneal fluorescein staining, or map dot fingerprint dystrophy) * Eyelid abnormalities that affect lid function in either eye, including: entropion, ectropion, tumor, edema, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, and severe ptosis * Any systemic condition that may cause dry eye disease, including: Stevens-Johnson syndrome, vitamin A deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, Wegener's granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, leukemia, Riley-Day syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Sjögren's syndrome * Unwilling or unable to abstain from the use of medications known to cause dryness (e.g., isotretinoin, antihistamines) throughout the study duration. Subjects must discontinue these medications for at least 1 month prior to the baseline visit. * Any condition revealed whereby the investigator deems the subject inappropriate for this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT)10 weeksChange of Tear breakup time (TBUT) in the study eye, from baseline to follow-up. TBUT is measured in seconds. Higher values mean better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)10 weeksChange of self-assessed symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, from baseline to follow-up. OSDI was collected per patient (one number per patient). The minimal number is 0 and the maximal number is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome. A score of 0-12 is considered normal. A score of 13-22 is consistent with mild dry eye. A score of 23 to 32 is consistent with moderate dry eye. A score from 33 to 100 is consistent with severe dry eye.
Change From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS)10 weeksChange of self-assessed symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) , from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes. Values were collected separately for each eye. Correlation between eyes was removed by statistical methods. Scores were 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores = worse outcome. VAS scores are not validated for dry eye. Hence, it is not known how to correlate VAS values to severity levels of dry eye. However, one can make estimations from the literature of VAS in other conditions. For example, in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in a VAS scale of 0 to 10 scores below 3.4 corresponded to mild pain, scores between 3.5 and 7.4 corresponded to moderate pain, and scores above 7.5 corresponded to severe pain. Using such results from other conditions, it is \*estimated\* that values between 0 and 34 correspond to mild symptoms, scores between 35 and 74 correspond to moderate symptoms, and scores above 75 correspond to severe symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Normal Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)10 weeksThe difference in the proportion of subjects with normal OSDI (OSDI \< 23) at FU, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm
Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events10 weeksThe difference in the incidence of ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm
Incidence of Non-ocular Adverse Events10 weeksThe difference in the incidence of non ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm
Qualitative Assessment of Eyelid Appearance10 weeksHigh resolution photos of the upper and lower eyelids in both eyes
Immediate Biomicroscopy10 weeksdifference in the change of bio-microscopy examinations pre- and post- treatment, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm
Pain/Discomfort During Intense Pulsed Light (IPL)10 weeksThe difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during IPL administration, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm
Pain/Discomfort During Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)10 weeksThe difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during MGX, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm
Incidence of Unanticipated Serious Adverse Events10 weeksThe difference in the incidence of unanticipated serious adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm
Meiboscore10 weeksThe difference in the percentage of area loss of meibomian glands, as evaluated using meibography, between eyes in the study arm and eyes in the control arm
Percentage of Eyes With Normal Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)10 weeksThe difference in the proportion of eyes with normal TBUT (TBUT \> 10 sec) at follow-up, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham+MGX
Sham IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (control group)
43
IPL+MGX
Patients treated with IPL followed by meibomian gland expression (study group)
45
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up06

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham+MGXIPL+MGXTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants13 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants32 Participants61 Participants
Age, Continuous56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
38 Participants39 Participants77 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
43 participants45 participants88 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants20 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants25 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 430 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 434 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 430 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Change of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT)

Change of Tear breakup time (TBUT) in the study eye, from baseline to follow-up. TBUT is measured in seconds. Higher values mean better outcome.

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham+MGXChange of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT)0.75 secondsStandard Error 0.34
IPL+MGXChange of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT)1.99 secondsStandard Error 0.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS)

Change of self-assessed symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) , from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes. Values were collected separately for each eye. Correlation between eyes was removed by statistical methods. Scores were 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores = worse outcome. VAS scores are not validated for dry eye. Hence, it is not known how to correlate VAS values to severity levels of dry eye. However, one can make estimations from the literature of VAS in other conditions. For example, in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in a VAS scale of 0 to 10 scores below 3.4 corresponded to mild pain, scores between 3.5 and 7.4 corresponded to moderate pain, and scores above 7.5 corresponded to severe pain. Using such results from other conditions, it is \*estimated\* that values between 0 and 34 correspond to mild symptoms, scores between 35 and 74 correspond to moderate symptoms, and scores above 75 correspond to severe symptoms.

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham+MGXChange From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS)-25.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.6
IPL+MGXChange From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS)-32.96 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

Change of self-assessed symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, from baseline to follow-up. OSDI was collected per patient (one number per patient). The minimal number is 0 and the maximal number is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome. A score of 0-12 is considered normal. A score of 13-22 is consistent with mild dry eye. A score of 23 to 32 is consistent with moderate dry eye. A score from 33 to 100 is consistent with severe dry eye.

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham+MGXChange From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)-25.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.6
IPL+MGXChange From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)-29.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.78
Other Pre-specified

Immediate Biomicroscopy

difference in the change of bio-microscopy examinations pre- and post- treatment, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Non-ocular Adverse Events

The difference in the incidence of non ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events

The difference in the incidence of ocular adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Unanticipated Serious Adverse Events

The difference in the incidence of unanticipated serious adverse events, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Meiboscore

The difference in the percentage of area loss of meibomian glands, as evaluated using meibography, between eyes in the study arm and eyes in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Pain/Discomfort During Intense Pulsed Light (IPL)

The difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during IPL administration, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Pain/Discomfort During Meibomian Gland Expression (MGX)

The difference in the self-assessment of pain/discomfort during MGX, between subjects in the study arm and subjects in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Eyes With Normal Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)

The difference in the proportion of eyes with normal TBUT (TBUT \> 10 sec) at follow-up, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Subjects With Normal Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

The difference in the proportion of subjects with normal OSDI (OSDI \< 23) at FU, between study eyes in the study arm and study eyes in the control arm

Time frame: 10 weeks

Other Pre-specified

Qualitative Assessment of Eyelid Appearance

High resolution photos of the upper and lower eyelids in both eyes

Time frame: 10 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026