Skip to content

Traditional Versus Virtual Reality for Surgical Skills for ObGyn Residents

Comparison Between Exclusive Surgical Training Versus Virtual Reality Plus Traditional Training in Surgical Skills of Residents of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03395821
Acronym
SIMUTEC
Enrollment
24
Registered
2018-01-10
Start date
2017-12-22
Completion date
2018-12-01
Last updated
2018-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecologic Disease

Keywords

competency-based education, gynecology, laparoscopy, resident education, simulation, surgical curriculum

Brief summary

This study will verify if a comprehensive laparoscopic curriculum using virtual reality demonstrates skills transfer to the operating room, compared to the traditional teaching method.

Detailed description

Second-year residents from different programs of residency in obstetrics and gynecology in Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, will be invited to participate in this study. they will be randomized to receive a comprehensive training in laparoscopy using modern virtual reality program or the traditional method of training according to their residency program. After 12 weeks of training, they will finish their training and they will perform advanced laparoscopic surgery in the simulator according to their specific needs, for example, salpingectomy, oophorectomy advanced laparoscopic suture or hysterectomy. Data generated from the simulator program will be compared between groups.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALConventional training

traditional training according to residency program

BEHAVIORALVirtual Reality+conventional training

virtual reality training+traditional training using virtual reality

Sponsors

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Two groups will be compared according to their surgical skills.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* residents in obstetrics and gynecology that are about to finish their second-year program

Exclusion criteria

* refuse to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficiency of technical skills (%)12 weeksThe software analyzes the percentage of time the needle-holders' ends are kept outside the operative field (%); total number of entrance and exit points through which the needle has passed; total aggressive tissue handling; total amount of strain applied to tissue during needle passages; total needle loading time; total number of completed knots; total number of needle loadings; total number of needle passages; total number of stitches; total time the needle-holders' ends are kept outside the predefined operative field; total time to accomplish the suture; Total time to form a knot. For salpingectomy: efficiency of cautery (%); number of non-cauterized bleeding; number of serious complications: possible damage to vital structures; safe cautery (%); the time cautery is applied without appropriate contact with adhesions; total number of applied clips.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactGuilherme G Pretto, MD,PhD
gpretto@hcpa.edu.br+1(51)33597938
Backup ContactRicardo F Savaris, MD,PhD
rsavaris@hcpa.edu.br+1(51)33598117

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026