Skip to content

Fingerprick Autologous Blood (FAB) in Severe Dry Eye Disease (DED)

The Feasibility of Fingerprick Autologous Blood (FAB) As a Novel Treatment for Severe Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03395431
Acronym
FAB
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-01-10
Start date
2018-02-28
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2018-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Keywords

Autologuous serum, dry eyes disease, fingerprick blood

Brief summary

Dry eye disease (DED) is an umbrella term encompassing a range of diseases estimated to affect 14% of all adults aged 48 to 91. If left untreated, DED can lead to severe reduction in the quality of life of the sufferer. It can also cause loss of vision, pain in response to light, painful recurring stabbing sensations, and the feeling of grit in the affected eye(s). No curative agents for DED exist. Available conventional treatment options for DED such as artificial tears often only alleviate symptoms, have limited effectiveness, and in most cases patients may fail to respond; although the exact rate of treatment failure is unavailable in the published literature. Crudely, human tears with its vast constituents is essentially filtered blood and as such is an obvious source for a tear mimic containing the substances of tears. Blood, and several blood derived products, including autologous serum, have been studied as tear substitute candidates. This study proposes to test the use of finger prick autologous blood (FAB) technique in which whole blood is applied to the eye from a cleaned finger.

Detailed description

Autologous serum (AS) eye drops have been found in uncontrolled trials to be beneficial in DED patient by improving the ocular surface and reducing symptoms. Obtaining autologous serum requires frequent drawing of blood from the patient- a feature that excludes patients with anaemia or heart failure from using AS. Furthermore it also appears that 100% autologous serum is more beneficial than 50% serum and requires larger volumes of blood and/or more frequent venesection. Patients using AS also require access to a fridge as the product needs to be stored at low temperatures; a factor that is likely to be inconvenient for patients. In addition, AS is obtained by processing clotted blood which is often too expensive for the health service to consistently purchase, given the initial cost of £1653.56 and subsequent three-monthly cost of £1131.27 per patient. The relatively high cost represents the biggest hurdle in the use of AS and is often the reason for delay or inaccessibility in starting treatment for DED using AS. However, we propose that finger prick autologous blood may be a simpler, cost-effective and possibly more acceptable method for treating dry eye disease. For this reason, this study proposes to test the use of finger prick autologous blood (FAB) technique in which whole blood is applied to the eye from a cleaned finger. The proposing team have completed an exploratory study on the use of finger-prick autologous blood (FAB) for persistent epithelial defects and severe dry eye disease and preliminary results indicate improvement with no adverse events reported. The exploratory study included 16 patients with a diagnosis of severe to moderate dry eye syndrome and used the FAB method for treatment. The findings of the study demonstrated mean improvements in visual acuity, Oxford corneal staining grade, tear breakup time, Schirmer's test and dry eye disease questionnaire score. The response rate from participants was good with only a single patient who met the inclusion criteria not wishing to participate in the trial on the advice of their general practitioner. Both the amount of staining (indicating inflammation and ocular surface damage) and their DED questionnaire scores (indicating severity of their symptoms and impact on quality of life) showed mean improvement which reached statistical significance.

Interventions

OTHERFingerprick autologuos blood (FAB)

Intervention involves the instillation of whole blood obtained from the prick of a clean finger 4 times a day.

Sponsors

Anglia Ruskin University
CollaboratorOTHER
Bedford Hospital NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome assessor will be blinded to group assignment

Intervention model description

A single blind parallel group randomized control trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient age ≥ 18 years * Severe symptomatic dry eye disease diagnosed by: Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score of greater than 33; OR Oxford Corneal Staining grade 2 or greater; OR Schirmer's without anaesthesia \<5mm at 5 minutes * Patients on artificial tears and/or lubricating drops/gel two or more times a day * Patient able to give consent * Patients able and willing complete the quality of life (QoL) questionnaires required for the study

Exclusion criteria

* Fear of needles * Unable or not willing to carry out repeat finger pricks * Patients with infected finger/s or systemic infection or on systemic antibiotics for infection. * Patients with active ocular infection, active immunological corneal melt, or recurrent corneal erosion. * Pregnant or breast feeding women * Previous use of FAB treatment (e.g. from exploratory study) * Systemic illness causing immune system deficiency * Graft versus host disease * Previous use of autologous serum within 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients recruited into the study within the specified time frame12 monthsThis will involve specifically assessing the number of eligible patient in study population consented and randomized.
Number of patients who adhere to trial protocol12monthsMeasured by self-reported adherence to trial protocol

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in objective signs of dry eye disease as indicated by visual acuity3 monthsThis will be assessed using the Snellen chart
Willingness for patients to be randomised and acceptability of the intervention3 monthsThis will be assessed by structured qualitative interviews
Reduction in corneal inflammation as indicated by staining on front of the eye3 monthsAssessed using the Oxford Corneal Staining Guide graded on a scale from 0 to 5 in order of increasing severity
Cost to the NHS and patient3 monthsThis will be assessed by use of additional NHS services and privately purchased over the counter treatments related to dry eyes disease
Intraocular pressure (IOT)3 monthsIntraocular pressure will be measured to assessed safety of the intervention
Impact on patients' quality of life3 monthsThis will be assessed by EQ-5D-5L score with higher scores indicating improvement in quality of life
Patient pain and symptoms scores3 monthsThis will be assessed by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score assessed on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher score representing severity

Contacts

Primary ContactAnant Sharma, MD
anant.sharma@bedfordhospital.nhs.uk01234
Backup ContactShafi Balal, MBBS
shafi.balal@nhs.net01234

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026