Skip to content

Implementation of New Trauma Triage Criteria and Implications on Under- and Overtriage.

Implementation of New Trauma Triage Criteria and Implications on Under- and Overtriage

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03395158
Acronym
Traumalert
Enrollment
2200
Registered
2018-01-10
Start date
2016-06-01
Completion date
2017-11-01
Last updated
2018-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trauma Injury

Brief summary

New trauma alert criteria has been introduced in Sweden, and our aim in this study is to evaluate the outcome of the old and new trauma alert criteria in a cohort of 1.300.000 inhabitants at six hospitals regarding over- and undertriage and number of alerts initiated. The Swedish trauma registry is used to identify eligible patients.

Detailed description

The Swedish trauma registry (SweTrau) was initiated in 2011, and has up to date 40.000 registered patients. In order to evaluate trauma alert criteria implemented during 2017, we plan a prospective stepped wedge trial at six hospitals in the Uppsala/Örebro region. These hospitals register in SweTrau and all had the same alert criteria prior to the implementation of new alert criteria. A power estimation show the need for 588 patients in each group in order to show a statistical difference between 2-5% undertriage at a 95% CI. The including hospitals has a population base of 1.300.000 inhabitants, and the annual number of trauma alerts has been about 3.000. The registry has information about time of trauma, initiated alerts, Injury Severity Score and mechanism of injury suitable for analysis for our hypothesis.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTImplementation of new alert criteria

The intervention is when the prior alert criteria are replaced by the present alert criteria

Sponsors

Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER
Uppsala University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- All patients registered in SweTrau at all including sites between 1 June 2016 and 1 November 2017

Exclusion criteria

* Patients registered due to secondary referral where the initial assessment was performed at another hospital

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of alerts initiatedOne year data with interventionThe total number of trauma alerts initiated in the study group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis of over- and undertriage with the Matrix methodOne year data with interventionAnalyse proportions of patients subject to a full trauma team activation who have an injury severity score \<15 (overtriage). Analyse proportion of patients who do not initiate a full trauma team activation but have an injury severity score \>15 (undertriage) The Matrix method is a well defined method for analysing resource allocation in trauma triage.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026