Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve Block in Below Knee Amputation Surgery

Ultrasound -Guided Sciatic Nerve Block in Below Knee Amputation Surgery: Subgluteal Versus Popliteal

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03394014
Enrollment
56
Registered
2018-01-09
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2017-07-01
Last updated
2018-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sciatic Nerve Block

Brief summary

56 ASA physical status II and III patients, aged 45-75 year, undergoing elective below knee amputation were randomly assigned to receive either sciatic nerve block using a popliteal approach or a sub gluteal approach. Patients in both groups received same amount of LA and additional ultrasound guided femoral nerve block to ensure sensory block of the medial side of the leg. Success of the block was considered when the block is solid and doesn't require shifting to GA

Detailed description

56 ASA physical status II and III patients, aged 45-75 year, undergoing elective below knee amputation were randomly assigned to receive either sciatic nerve block using a popliteal approach (group P, n 28) or a sub gluteal approach (group G, n 28). Patients in both groups received same amount of LA (25 ml of bupivacaine 0.5 %) and additional ultrasound guided femoral nerve block by 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% to ensure sensory block of the medial side of the leg. Time to complete sensory and motor block, time taken to perform the block, block-related complications, block duration, time for asking for rescue analgesia in the first 24 h were recorded and both patients and surgeons were asked about their level of satisfaction. Success of the block was considered when the block is solid and doesn't require shifting to GA

Interventions

PROCEDUREsciatic nerve block

blocking sciatic nerve either at the subgluteal area or the popliteal region for effective anesthesia and analgesia during below knee amputation

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status II and III patients * aged 45-75 years, * undergoing elective below knee amputation

Exclusion criteria

* patients who refused to participate in the study, * those having allergy to local anaesthetics, * or having contraindications to regional anaesthesia (having neurologic or neuromuscular disease, on anticoagulation therapy, or having skin infection at the site of needle insertion).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
to compare between the two techniques as regards the success rate.24 hoursSuccess was considered when the block provided solid analgesia with no need to shift to GA

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time taken to perform the block10-20 mintime required to perform either block

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026