Skip to content

The Improvement Of Pelvic Exams for Patients With Chronic Vulvovaginal Conditions

The Improvement Of Pelvic Exams for Patients With Chronic Vulvovaginal Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03393910
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-01-09
Start date
2018-01-22
Completion date
2018-07-16
Last updated
2018-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate patients self-reported comfort levels during each section of the pelvic exam.

Detailed description

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the sequence in which physicians perform the pelvic exam, describe and compare self-reported comfort during each section of the pelvic exam and how comfort during the examinations related to quality of life, self-esteem, and sexual function in English speaking females at least 18 years of age with chronic vulvovaginal conditions.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTExperimental Pelvic Exam

The pelvic exam will be completed in the following order: external, speculum, bimanual exam in the standard group. In the Experimental group the pelvic exam will be done with external xam, bimanual exam then speculum exam.

Sponsors

Drexel University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English Speaking Are able to read and write English Are utilizing outpatient services and being seen for a first appointment at an outpatient Vulvodynia Center

Exclusion criteria

* Non English Speaking * Patients who cannot read or write * Those who are pregnant * Those who do not have a chronic vulvovaginal condition * Patients other than new patients * Patients who would not otherwise need a speculum exam

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Score: A change of 13mmWithin 1 hour of the examale from 0-10, measured in mm. A change from baseline of 13mm is considered a significant change

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wellbeing quality of life score: Range 0-4Within 1 hour of the examHigh wellbeing 2.504.0, Low Wellbeing 1.5-2.4, and very low wellbeing 0-1.4
Rosenberg Self-esteem Score: Scale 10-40Within 1 hour of the examHigher numbers indicate higher self-esteem
Female Sexual Function Index-19Within 1 hour of the examScore of less than 26.55 indicates sexual dysfunction

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026