Skip to content

Influence of Sleep Quality in Patients With Periorbicular Hyperchromia

Influence of Sleep Quality in Patients With Periorbicular Hyperchromia: a Case Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03393624
Enrollment
302
Registered
2018-01-08
Start date
2017-10-01
Completion date
2020-02-10
Last updated
2020-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periorbital Disorder

Keywords

Dark circles, Periorbital hyperchromia, Sleep Quality, Facial aesthetics

Brief summary

Periorbital hyperchromia (POH) or periorbital hyperpigmentation, commonly known as dark circles, is a relatively common condition and a frequent reason for dermatological consultation. It is defined as brown-colored pigmentation, ranging from light to dark, which mainly involves the lower eyelids. POH affects individuals over a wide age range, including both sexes and all ethnicities, and is associated with a tired and aged facial appearance. The most commonly affected people are those with the highest skin phototypes. Although the prevalence is similar between sexes and age groups, POH is a more frequent complaint in women. The dark circles characteristic of POH can negatively impact patients' quality of life, although it is not a condition associated with morbidity. Popularly it is believed that the poor quality of sleep is a factor responsible for its appearance, but there is no consistent data in the literature that prove this.

Detailed description

We aim to compare the quality of sleep through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-BR) already translated and validated in Portuguese for patients with periorbicular hyperchromia (cases) with patients without this complaint (controls) and to compare dermatological quality of life through the Quality of Life in Dermatology Index (DLQI) already translated and validated for Portuguese patients with periorbicular hyperchromia (cases) with patients without this complaint (controls). Patients and / or family members who consult in the Dermatology of the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre (preferably), but also other patients and / or relatives with outpatient care in this institution will be invited to participate in the control group. The WinPepi program, version 11.32, was used to calculate the sample size. This objective predicts a Pareto Control Case study by age, with a ratio of 1: 1. The sample size was 252 subjects, 126 cases and 126 controls. Adding 10% to possible losses and refusals the sample size should be 280 subjects, with 140 cases and 140 controls. This value was stipulated taking into account the mean of 5.9 in the PSQI-BR of the cases already collected (n = 148 subjects) and corresponds to a difference of almost 3 points in the index ranging from zero to 21, corresponding to approximately 15% difference between groups. For this calculation was considered 80% power and significance level of 5%.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Cases: Patients with periocular hyperchromia diagnosed by clinical examination. * Controls: Patients without periocular hyperchromia diagnosed by clinical examination.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant patients * Active collagenase patients * Patients with bacterial or viral infections on the periorbicular area * Patients undergoing any treatment modality for periocular hyperpigmentation in the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Indexat 1 day visit 1To evaluate the sleep quality in patients with periocular hyperpigmentation comparing with patients without periocular hyperpigmentation. The questionnaire consists of 19 questions, which are grouped into 7 components, with values distributed on a scale of zero to 3. These components are subjective quality of sleep, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency , sleep disorders, use of sleeping pills, and daytime dysfunction. The scores of these components are summed to form a global score, ranging from zero to 21. The higher the score, the worse the quality of sleep. A PSQI score\> 5 indicates that the individual is experiencing major difficulties in at least 2 components, or moderate difficulties in more than 3 components.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life Index in Dermatologyat 1 day visit 1To evaluate the impact of periocular hyperpigmentation on patients' dermatological quality of life comparing with patients without periocular hyperpigmentation. this is a score used to evaluate the damage caused by dermatological diseases. It consists of 10 questions, with four alternative answers, corresponding to scores from 0 to 3. The maximum score is 30 and the minimum is zero, with 30 being the highest loss in the dermatological quality of life.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026