Skip to content

Lung Ultrasound Guided Protocol for Fluid Management for the Critically Ill Patient: a Randomized Study

Lung Ultrasound Guided Fluid Management Protocol for the Critically Ill Patient: a Randomized Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03393065
Acronym
LUNG US ICU
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-01-08
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2019-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

lung ultrasounds, fluid managements, critical care patients

Brief summary

In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) this bedside method of assessing lung congestion could be useful in a better management of the critically ill patients with a wide range of respiratory failure causes (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, COPD, acute pulmonary edema, pneumonia etc.). Fluid management is a key issue in the ICU where patients are either hemodynamic unstable and/or mechanically ventilated. A randomized study is proposed where in the interventional arm the fluid management (volume replacement, diuretics, use of vasopressors) will be guided using the BLS as a sign of pulmonary congestion.

Detailed description

Inclusion criteria \- Age 18 or older admitted to the Intensive Care Unit Exclusion criteria * Due to LUS measurement limitation: patients with known persistent pleurisy, pulmonary fibrosis or pneumectomy; * Unwillingness to participate in the study. Active arm diuretic administration algorithm * Intravenous diuretics will be used only to decrease the BLS to \< 15; * A stepped diuretic administration algorithm is provided below; * Investigators may opt-out of the stepped diuretic administration algorithm if they feel it is in the best interests of the patient care; * Intravenous diuretics can be decreased or temporarily discontinued if there is a decrease in blood pressure or an increase in creatinine that is felt to be due to a transient episode of intravascular volume depletion. After the patient has stabilized, if BLS ≥ 15, intravenous diuretics should be reinitiated until the patient's BLS is \<15. Active arm Initial BLS ≥ 15 Diuretic dose Previous Dose Suggested dose Furosemide (/day) Furosemide (/day) Hydrochlorothiazide (/day) 1. ≤ 80 mg 40 mg iv bolus + 5 mg/h 0 2. 81-160 mg 80 mg iv bolus + 10 mg/h 12.5 mg 3. 161-240 mg 80 mg iv bolus + 20 mg/h 25 mg 4. \>240 mg 80 mg iv bolus + 30 mg/h 25 mg At 24 hours Persistent BLS ≥ 15 Negative fluid balance \> 1000 ml - reduce current diuretic regimen if desired Negative fluid balance \< 1000 ml - maintain current diuretic regimen Positive fluid balance - advance to next step in table Dialysis initiation AKI will be diagnosed based on changes in the serum creatinine, urine output, or both (according to the KDIGO recommendations). Creatinine measurements will be performed twice per day. Every patient will have a urinary catheter and urine output will be measured every hour. Criteria for renal replacement therapy initiation: Stage 3 AKI (urine output \<0.3 mL/kg/h for ≥24 h and/or \>3 fold increase in serum creatinine level compared with baseline or serum creatinine of ≥4 mg/dL with an acute increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL within 48 hours or If any of the following absolute indications for RRT were present: * Blood urea nitrogen level higher than 112 mg/dL; * Serum potassium level higher than 6 mEq/L and/or with electrocardiography abnormalities; * Urine production lower than 200 mL per 12 hours or anuria (according to the KDIGO recommendations); * Organ edema in the presence of AKI resistant to diuretic treatment; * A pH below 7.15 in the context of either pure metabolic acidosis (Paco2 below 35 mm Hg) or mixed acidosis (Paco2 of 50 mm Hg or more without the possibility of increasing alveolar ventilation) * Acute pulmonary edema due to fluid overload responsible for severe hypoxemia requiring an oxygen flow rate greater than 5 liters per minute to maintain a Spo2 greater than 95% or requiring a Fio2 greater than 50% in patients receiving mechanical ventilation and despite diuretic therapy.

Interventions

OTHERFluid management guided by BLS

We propose a randomized study where in the interventional arm the fluid management (volume replacement, diuretics, use of vasopressors) will be guided using the BLS as a sign of pulmonary congestion.

Sponsors

Professor Adrian Covic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Results of the lung ultrasounds will not be made publicly available

Intervention model description

The patients will be randomized in two groups: in the intervention group pulmonary congestion, as assessed by the BLS will guide the fluid management, with a target of below 15 BLS. In the control group the fluid management will not be LUS guided. In both groups, further complementary fluid assessment methods will be performed blindly from the investigators: body composition assessment by bioimpedance and biochemical panel consisting in cardiac biomarkers (NTproBNP, cTnT) and inflamatory markers (IL-6).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Exclusion criteria

* known persistent pleurisy, pulmonary fibrosis or pneumectomy (due to lung ultrasonography limitations); * unwillingness to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
28 days survival28 daysall-cause mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensive care unit hospitalization28 dayshospitalization in ICU
Duration of hospitalization28 dayshospitalization
Days on mechanical ventilation28 daysNeed for mechanical ventilatory support

Countries

Romania

Contacts

Primary Contactcovic adrian, prof
accovic@gmail.com+40.232.301.600
Backup Contactmihai onofriescu, prof
onomihai@yahoo.com+40.232.301.600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026