Skip to content

Efficacy of 1540 Nanometer Erbium Glass Laser to Improve Benign Dermatofibromas

Efficacy of 1540 Nanometer Erbium Glass Laser to Improve Benign Dermatofibromas

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03392935
Enrollment
37
Registered
2018-01-08
Start date
2017-11-30
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2023-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dermatofibroma of Skin

Brief summary

This study is to find a more effective treatment for itchy, painful or unsightly dermatofibromas, that will improve symptoms of itch and/or pain and/or improve the appearance of dermatofibromas. This is an open-label study where subjects will receive a laser treatment at week 0, and week 4, and then 2 additional follow-up visits. Photographs will be taken at each visit and rated by blinded reviewers after the study to determine efficacy.

Detailed description

The main objective of this study is to find a more effective treatment for itchy, painful or unsightly dermatofibromas, that will improve symptoms of itch and/or pain and/or improve the appearance of dermatofibromas. A secondary objective of this study is to better understand the 1540 nanometer Erbium glass laser and its impact on the skin. This is an open-label study where subjects will receive a laser treatment at week 0, and week 4, and then have 2 additional follow-up visits (no laser treatment at these visits). Photographs will be taken at each visit and photographs from pre-treatment and follow-up 1 (week 8) will rated by blinded reviewers after the study to determine efficacy.

Interventions

DEVICE1540 nanometer Erbium glass laser

Subjects will receive laser treatment by dermatologist at week 0 and week 4.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Outcome assessors are masked and will not know which photos are pre-treatment or follow-up visit 1, however, they do know that all subjects received treatment at some point. They will rate the dermatofibromas to determine efficacy. However, there is only one arm of this study. All patients are receiving the same treatment. Outcomes assessors are the only masked roles.

Intervention model description

All subjects will have their dermatofibromas treated with the laser at week 0, and week 4. Blinded outcome assessors will rate photos (pre-treatment and follow-up visit 1) to determine efficacy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* female or male, age 18-65, have at least one dermatofibroma of the skin, on the trunk or extremities, diagnosed by dermatologist, dermatofibroma is either itchy, painful or unattractive to the patient.

Exclusion criteria

* previous treatment to the dermatofibroma(s), pregnant or nursing women, diabetic, smoker, psoriasis, lupus or other autoimmune diseases, patient with a clear history of keloids or poor wound healing. This study will exclude dermatofibroma lesions on the face and genitals.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Color Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.12 weeksPatient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Itch Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.12 WeeksPatient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).
Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Texture Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.12 WeeksPatient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).
Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Pain Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.12 weeksPatient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
All subjects will be treated with the laser at week 0 and week 4. Only assessors will be blinded and rate the dermatofibromas in photographs, they will not know which photos were taken pre-treatment vs. post-treatment to determine efficacy. 1540 nanometer Erbium glass laser: Subjects will receive laser treatment by dermatologist at week 0 and week 4.
37
All Subjects
All subjects will be treated with the laser at week 0 and week 4. Only assessors will be blinded and rate the dermatofibromas in photographs, they will not know which photos were taken pre-treatment vs. post-treatment to determine efficacy. 1540 nanometer Erbium glass laser: Subjects will receive laser treatment by dermatologist at week 0 and week 4.
46
Total83

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants
Age, Continuous43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Color Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.

Patient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsModified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Color Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.-2.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Secondary

Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Itch Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.

Patient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsModified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Itch Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.-0.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Secondary

Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Pain Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.

Patient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsModified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Pain Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Secondary

Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Texture Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.

Patient reported assessment scale of pain, itch, color, and texture. Each element (pain, itch, color, and texture) is graded on a 1-10 scale. The lowest score is '1', which corresponds to the situation of normal skin/no symptoms (i.e. not different in color, not different in texture, no itching, no pain). Score 10 equals the largest difference from normal skin (i.e. severely painful, severely itchy, vert different color, very different texture).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsModified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Texture Component Comparing Change From Baseline to Week 12.-2.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026