Skip to content

End Of Life in the Critically Ill patiEnt

End Of Life in the Critically Ill patiEnt

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03392857
Acronym
EOLE
Enrollment
514
Registered
2018-01-08
Start date
2018-03-28
Completion date
2019-02-13
Last updated
2019-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, Terminal Illness

Keywords

Critical care

Brief summary

The purpose of this multicentric study is to evaluate the perception of the quality of the end of life in intensive care units seen from the side of the caregivers, trough the CAESAR scale.

Detailed description

More than 20% of deaths occur in hospital after a stay in intensive care units; up to half of them happens as result of a treatment limitation. Ensuring end-of-life quality is important, not only because is a moral duty of all caregivers, but also to prevent negative effects in close relatives of dead patients. In an assessment of quality of in-hospital deaths involving 3793 patients, only 35% of the deaths were judged to be of acceptable quality by the nurses. Assessment tools have been developed recently on this topic. Most studies have focused on the perception of end-of-life quality by close relatives, particularly through the CAESAR scale in the most recent one. The main purpose of this multicentric study is to evaluate the perception of the quality of the end-of-life in intensive care units seen from the side of the caregivers, in relation to the new French legislative framework.

Interventions

OTHERAssessment by caregivers of the quality of the end of life in intensive care units

Quality of the end of life in intensive care units perception will be explore from the side of the caregivers, trough the CAESAR scale.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
French Society for Intensive Care
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Caregivers of intensive care unit whose patient has recently deceased

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of participation by caregivers * Refusal of participation by family of deceased patient * Patient in cardiac arrest at the time of ICU admission. * Age of deceased patient was under 18 years * Patient in brain death

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
15 items questionnaire CAESARDepending of end-of-life duration, usually 6 hours.The CAESAR scale assesses perceptions of palliative stage of patient's pathology, of patient's comfort, of presence and care of close relatives, with a score for each item ranging from 1 (traumatic experience) to 5 (soothing). The purpose of our study is to assess the perception of end-of-life quality seen from the caregivers' side, using the CAESAR scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Variables associated with the perception by caregivers of end-of-life qualitytime needed for the enrollment of caregivers of 5 to 15 consecutive deceased patients per center (depending on the size of the center): usually 1 monthEvaluate the variables associated with the perception by caregivers of end-of-life quality: proportion of treatment limitations, frequencies of conflicts between close relatives of dead patients and caregivers, frequencies end-of-life deep sedations, detailed description of current sedation practices, proportion of treatments, monitoring and blood tests maintained after treatment limitation during end-of-life .
Analogic visual scale (0 to 10)Depending of end-of-life duration, usually 6 hours.Analogic visual scale on end-of-life quality seen from the caregiver's side

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026