Skip to content

Mechanochemical Ablation Compared to Cyanoacrylate Adhesive

Randomised Controlled Trial of Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Cyanoacrylate Adhesive for the Treatment of Varicose Veins

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03392753
Enrollment
167
Registered
2018-01-08
Start date
2017-11-06
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins

Brief summary

This study will be comparing the treatment of varicose veins using either mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) or cyanoacrylate adhesive (CAE). Patients will be randomised to receiving either MOCA or CAE. The pain scores, clinical scores, quality of life scores, occlusion and re-intervention rate at 2 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months as well as the cost effectiveness of each intervention will be assessed.

Detailed description

This will be a randomised clinical trial comparing MOCA to CAE. Patients will be randomised into group A (MOCA) or group B (CAE). Only the endovenous ablation part of the procedure will be randomised while the decision as to whether patients should receive treatment of their varicose tributaries will be at the discretion of the clinical team. The device used for MOCA (group A) will be the ClariVein® mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) device (Vascular Insights, Madison, CT, USA). The device used for CAE (group B) will be the VenaSealTM Closure System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). Re-intervention of the treated saphenous veins will not be decided until at least 3 months after their initial procedure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMechanochemical ablation

Treatment of incompetent saphenous veins using mechanochemical ablation (Clarivein)

PROCEDURECyanoacrylate adhesive

Treatment of incompetent saphenous veins using cyanoacrylate (VenaSealTM)

Sponsors

Singapore General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An internet-based randomisation service will be used Outcome assessors will be blinded as to treatment offered

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults over 18 years of age * Symptomatic GSV or SSV vein reflux \> 0.5 seconds on colour Duplex

Exclusion criteria

* Current DVT * Recurrent varicose veins * Arterial disease (ABPI\<0.8) * Vein diameter \< 3mm * Patient who are unwilling to participate * Inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires * Adverse reaction to sclerosant or cyanoacrylate * Not been involved in another venous trial for at least 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Score During AblationOn day 0 immediately following vein ablationPain score during saphenous vein ablation using a 0-100mm visual analogue scale (0=no pain; 100=worst pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Generic Quality of Life as Per EQ-5D QuestionnaireRecorded at 12 monthsUsing the EuroQoL's EQ-5D questionnaire (-0.085=worse quality of life; 1.000=best quality of life)
Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the AVVQRecorded at 12 monthsUsing the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) questionnaire (0=best quality of life; 100=worse quality of life)
Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the CIVIQ-2012 monthsUsing the CIVIQ-20 questionnaire (0=best quality of life; 100=worse quality of life)
Clinical Change as Per VCSS12 monthsUsing the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) (0=best; 30=worse)
Pain Score at the End of the ProcedureOn day 0 following vein ablation and any tributary treatmentPain score at the end of the procedure using a 0-100mm visual analogue scale (0=no pain; 100=worst pain)
Degree of Bruising at 2 Weeks2 weeksDegree of bruising at 2 weeks using a categorical 0-5 bruising scale (0=no bruising; 5=bruising extending beyond treated segment). The outcome measured is the number of participants with a degree of bruising between category 0-1.
Time to Return to Normal Activities2 weeksLength of time in days until normal activities are resumed
Occlusion Rates12 monthsRate of occlusion as assessed by duplex ultrasound
Pain Score Over the First 10 DaysFor the first 10 days since procedurePain score over the first 10 days using a 0-100mm visual analogue scale (0=no pain; 100=worst pain). The mean pain score was recorded daily and a mean value was calculated.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period: November 2017 and February 2020 Recruitment location: 1. Charing Cross Hospital (Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust) in London, UK; 2. Singapore General Hospital; 3. Sengkang General Hospital (Singapore)

Pre-assignment details

167 patients recruited

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)
Mechanochemical ablation using the ClariVein® mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) device (Vascular Insights, Madison, CT, USA). Mechanochemical ablation: Treatment of incompetent saphenous veins using mechanochemical ablation (Clarivein)
83
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)
Cyanoacrylate using the VenaSealTM Closure System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). Cyanoacrylate adhesive: Treatment of incompetent saphenous veins using cyanoacrylate (VenaSealTM)
84
Total167

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)TotalMechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)
Age, Continuous55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
34 participants67 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
50 participants100 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants99 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants68 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 830 / 84
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 832 / 84
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 830 / 84

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Score During Ablation

Pain score during saphenous vein ablation using a 0-100mm visual analogue scale (0=no pain; 100=worst pain)

Time frame: On day 0 immediately following vein ablation

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Pain Score During Ablation24 Units on a scale
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Pain Score During Ablation20 Units on a scale
Secondary

Clinical Change as Per VCSS

Using the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) (0=best; 30=worse)

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Clinical Change as Per VCSS2 score on a scale
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Clinical Change as Per VCSS2 score on a scale
Secondary

Degree of Bruising at 2 Weeks

Degree of bruising at 2 weeks using a categorical 0-5 bruising scale (0=no bruising; 5=bruising extending beyond treated segment). The outcome measured is the number of participants with a degree of bruising between category 0-1.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Degree of Bruising at 2 Weeks53 participants
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Degree of Bruising at 2 Weeks59 participants
Secondary

Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the AVVQ

Using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) questionnaire (0=best quality of life; 100=worse quality of life)

Time frame: Recorded at 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the AVVQ4 score on a scale
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the AVVQ5.9 score on a scale
Secondary

Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the CIVIQ-20

Using the CIVIQ-20 questionnaire (0=best quality of life; 100=worse quality of life)

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the CIVIQ-203.5 score on a scale
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Disease Specific Quality of Life as Per the CIVIQ-207.1 score on a scale
Secondary

Generic Quality of Life as Per EQ-5D Questionnaire

Using the EuroQoL's EQ-5D questionnaire (-0.085=worse quality of life; 1.000=best quality of life)

Time frame: Recorded at 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Generic Quality of Life as Per EQ-5D Questionnaire1 score on a scale
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Generic Quality of Life as Per EQ-5D Questionnaire1 score on a scale
Secondary

Occlusion Rates

Rate of occlusion as assessed by duplex ultrasound

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Occlusion Rates29 Participants
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Occlusion Rates31 Participants
Secondary

Pain Score at the End of the Procedure

Pain score at the end of the procedure using a 0-100mm visual analogue scale (0=no pain; 100=worst pain)

Time frame: On day 0 following vein ablation and any tributary treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Pain Score at the End of the Procedure8 Units on a scale
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Pain Score at the End of the Procedure11 Units on a scale
Secondary

Pain Score Over the First 10 Days

Pain score over the first 10 days using a 0-100mm visual analogue scale (0=no pain; 100=worst pain). The mean pain score was recorded daily and a mean value was calculated.

Time frame: For the first 10 days since procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Pain Score Over the First 10 Days10.5 Units on a scale
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Pain Score Over the First 10 Days7 Units on a scale
Secondary

Time to Return to Normal Activities

Length of time in days until normal activities are resumed

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA)Time to Return to Normal Activities7 days
Cyanoacrylate Adhesive (CAE)Time to Return to Normal Activities8.5 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026