Skip to content

Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture

Evaluation Of Chewing Efficiency Of Metal-Reinforced PolyAmide Denture Base In Comparison To Conventional Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base For Mandibular Complete Denture (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03391063
Enrollment
38
Registered
2018-01-05
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2018-07-01
Last updated
2018-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mouth, Edentulous

Brief summary

the trial is done in order to reinforce polyamide to improve its modulus of elasticity to be able to use it as a denture base material in all clinical cases

Interventions

metal reinforced polyamide denture base material

conventional heat cured acrylic resin denture base material

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female patient with age range (45-55) completely edentulous and in good medical condition. 2. All patients have skeletal Angle's class I maxillo-mandibular relationship and have sufficient interarch distance. 3. Free from any systemic or neuromuscular disorder that might affect chewing efficiency of masticatory muscles. 4. Free from any tempro-mandibular joint disorder. 5. The patients have good oral hygiene. 6. The edentulous ridges should be covered by firm healthy mucosa. 7. Healthy and co-operative patients.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with bad habits as severe clenching or bruxism, drug or alcohol addiction, moderate or heavy smoking (greater than 10 cigarettes per day). 2. Previous history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy. 3. Any skeletal problem dictates surgical intervention. 4. Patients having hormonal disorders as diabetes, thyroid or parathyroid hormonal diseases were not included. 5. Patient with xerostomia or excessive salivation. 6. No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathosis. 7. Psychiatric problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
chewing efficiency assessed using sieving method6 weekschewing efficiency of the mandibular complete denture

Contacts

Primary Contactmahmoud abdallah abdelomttaleb, B.D.S
m.abdalla2022@yahoo.com01016344118
Backup ContactAmal Kaddah

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026