Skip to content

Misoprostol Versus Active Management of Labour in CS

Intrauterine Misoprostol With Active Management of Labour Versus Active Management of Labour for Prevebtion of Postpartum Hemorage in Cesarean Section ,Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03390010
Enrollment
300
Registered
2018-01-04
Start date
2017-12-28
Completion date
2018-03-06
Last updated
2022-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section

Brief summary

Several treatment strategies are emplemented to prevent post delivery hemorage and decreasing maternal morbidity and mortality .

Detailed description

Many approved drugs are used in prophylaxis against postpartum hemorage from these medications are the (syntocinon combined with methergine ) that are known as active management of labour drugs . Moreover there is misotac , that also guards against postpartum hemorage . All these medications act in a different way to cause uterine contraction post delivery to prevent uterine atony . -Here we are comparing the additive value of misotac intrauterine to syntocinon and methergine in comparison to the usually used syntocinon plus methergine .

Interventions

DRUGMisoprostol + syntocinon and using extra uterotonic drugs when needed ; methergine

medical prophylaxis against postpartum atony and postpartum hemorage by giving misoprostol plus syntocinon and using extra uterotonic drugs when needed ; methergine, carboprost

DRUGSyntocinon and using extra uterotonic drugs when needed ; methergine carboprost

medical prophylaxis against postpartum atony and postpartum hemorage by giving syntocinon and using extra uterotonic drugs when needed ; methergine, carboprost

Sponsors

Cairo University
CollaboratorOTHER
Aljazeera Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • All patients included in this research were aged 18-42 years, pregnant 37 weeks till 42 weeks * no medical disorders with pregnancy e.g DM, HTN. All patients were subjected to full history taking, examination.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The number of participants who passed cesarean section without postpartum hemoragewithin 2 days post CS

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026