Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Abuse Potential of Oxymorphone Compared to Other Mu Opioid Agonists.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Abuse Potential of Oxymorphone Compared to Other Mu Opioid Agonists in Physically Dependent Opioid Users With Moderate-to-Severe Opioid Use Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03389750
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-01-04
Start date
2018-03-15
Completion date
2023-06-28
Last updated
2023-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid Use Disorder

Brief summary

Significant public health concerns have arisen from the intravenous misuse of oxymorphone, a potent mu-opioid pain medication. However, little is known about its abuse potential relative to other mu-opioid analgesics. The present study is designed to examine the abuse liability of intravenous oxymorphone compared to other mu opioid agonists (oxycodone, and hydromorphone) among physically dependent opioid abusers.

Detailed description

Significant public health concerns have arisen from the misuse of oxymorphone, a potent mu-opioid pain medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration as Opana and Opana ER. However, little is known about its abuse potential relative to other mu opioid analgesics. The present study is designed to examine the abuse liability of intravenous oxymorphone compared to other mu opioid agonists (oxycodone and hydromorphone). Participants who are physically dependent on opioids and who meet DSM 5 criteria for Opioid Use Disorder will complete the study across 2 sites, New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI) and the University of Kentucky; a total of 6 additional participants across 2 sites will complete a pilot phase of the study in order to establish comparable opioid dose-response functions based on subjective ratings of Drug Liking. All participants will reside in clinical inpatient units for the duration of the studies (both the 8- to 9-week main and 4- to 5-week pilot studies; please note that the pilot study is identical in design to the first 4-5 weeks of the main study). The study design is based on the 2017 FDA Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs: Guidance for Industry \[Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 2017\], which suggests the use of a double-blind, positive- and placebo-controlled design that includes a qualification phase and VAS measure of Drug Liking. The proposed study also examines the reinforcing effects of oxymorphone and other mu opioid agonists using two different drug self-administration procedures, namely Drug versus Money and Drug versus Drug choice procedures.

Interventions

DRUGIntravenous Challenge Drug

Intravenous administration of opioid drugs (oxycodone, oxymorphone, hydromorphone), for the purpose of comparison of their abuse potential among each other, and in comparison to placebo (saline).

Sponsors

University of Kentucky
CollaboratorOTHER
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Intravenous Challenge Drug

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to understand and provide signed and dated written consent. 2. Self-reported opioid use for nontherapeutic purposes on at least 21 days in the 30 days prior to screening, physical dependence on opioids, recent intravenous opioid use, and meeting DSM 5 criteria for moderate-severe opioid use disorder. 3. Positive urine drug screen for opioids (those who are in a methadone or buprenorphine treatment program are ineligible; physical dependence on street methadone or buprenorphine are also exclusionary so participants must produce at least one methadone- or buprenorphine-negative urine during screening). 4. ≥ 21 and ≤ 55 years of age. 5. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18 and ≤ 35 kg/m2 and weight ≥ 50 kg (110 pounds). 6. Otherwise healthy as determined by the investigator. 7. Demonstrate understanding how to complete the self-administration tasks and VAS Questionnaire. 8. Women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breastfeeding at screening. 9. Willing and able to comply with all testing requirements defined in the protocol. participation in the Study Treatment Phase: 1. During the Study Qualification Phase, on the bipolar 100--mm Drug Liking VAS, the subject must provide Emax ≥ 40 mm and \< 60 mm following placebo and, following morphine 56 mg/70 kg, i.v., Emax ≥ 60 mm and ≥ 15 mm closer to Strong Liking than the Emax to placebo. 2. In the judgment of the investigator, the subject is able to tolerate the i.v., opioids administered in the study, including the ability to complete most pharmacodynamics assessments administered post--dose. 3. In the judgment of the study staff, the subject's general behavior during the Study Qualification Phase suggests the ability to successfully complete the Study Treatment Phase.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of a medical or psychiatric disorder that would prevent successful completion of the study. 2. Current DSM-5 diagnosis of substance use disorders requiring medical management other than OUD. 3. Suicidal ideation or intent with or without a plan at Screening or within 6 months prior to Screening (i.e., answering Yes to questions 4 and/or 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale). 4. Currently seeking or participating in treatment for substance use disorder. 5. Physically dependent on drugs of abuse (other than opioids, nicotine, or caffeine) or alcohol. 6. Medically important deviation from normal limits on physical examination, vital signs, screening laboratory tests, or 12--lead ECG. 7. Significant cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, hematologic, or neurologic disorder. 8. Any surgical, or medical condition that may interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the test drug. 9. Family history of long QT syndrome and/or unexpected sudden cardiac death or is known to have QTc \> 500 ms at screening. 10. Used an investigational agent within 30 days or 5 therapeutic half-lives of that agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of study drug. 11. Hypersensitivity to opioids or any drug intended for use in this study. 12. Acute gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, fever, or Diarrhea unrelated to opioid withdrawal) ≤ 7 days before Day 1. 13. Any of the following values for laboratory tests at Screening: 1. A positive pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential. 2. Hemoglobin \< 11 g/dL in males and \< 10 gm/dL in females. 3. Neutrophil count \< 1.0 × 109/L. 4. Platelet count \< 75 × 109/L. 5. Creatinine clearance \< 50 ml/min per modified Cockcroft-Gault equation. 6. Aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase \> 3.0x upper limit of normal.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).Throughout study enrollment period (8-9 weeks)The positive subjective effects of the most efficacious dose of the intravenous challenge drugs. These are measured using self-reported assessment by the participant in terms of drug liking rated on a visual analog scale of 0-100. Higher values indicate a greater drug effect.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This investigation was a within-subjects design. The participants were presented with the following drugs/doses in randomized order: Oxymorphone (1.8, 3.2, 5.6, and 10 mg/70 kg) Oxycodone (10, 18, 32, 56 mg/70 kg) Hydromorphone (3.2, 5.6, 10, and 18 mg/70 kg) Placebo (0 mg). Data are only presented for individuals who received all 13 dose conditions (i.e., N=8).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intravenous Challenge Drug
All participants received: oxycodone, oxymorphone, and hydromorphone for the purpose of comparison of their abuse potential among each other and to placebo (saline).
16
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntravenous Challenge Drug
Age, Continuous38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 160 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Positive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).

The positive subjective effects of the most efficacious dose of the intravenous challenge drugs. These are measured using self-reported assessment by the participant in terms of drug liking rated on a visual analog scale of 0-100. Higher values indicate a greater drug effect.

Time frame: Throughout study enrollment period (8-9 weeks)

Population: The most robust self-reported drug Liking across the various dose of each IV drug (Scale: 0-100). These data are reported only for study completers (i.e., those individuals who experienced all 13 drug \& dose drug conditions). Higher values indicate a greater drug effect.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV PlaceboPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).52.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
IV Oxymorphone 1.8 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).57.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
IV Oxymorphone 3.2 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).71.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.2
IV Oxymorphone 5.6 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).71.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.1
IV Oxymorphone 10 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).84 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.9
IV Hydromorphone 3.2 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).66.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.8
IV Hydromorphone 5.6 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).71.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.9
IV Hydromorphone 10 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).84.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
IV Hydromorphone 18 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).79.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.4
IV Oxycodone 10 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).59.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
IV Oxycodone 18 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).63.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
IV Oxycodone 32 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).70.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
IV Oxycodone 56 mgPositive Subjective Drug Effects (i.e., Drug Liking).79.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.5
p-value: 0.0001ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026