Skip to content

Early Mitral ValvE Repair Versus Watchful Waiting for Asymptomatic SEvere Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Randomized Comparison of Early Mitral ValvE Repair Versus Watchful Waiting for Asymptomatic SEvere Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Due to Leaflet Prolapse

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03389542
Acronym
REVERSE-MR
Enrollment
424
Registered
2018-01-03
Start date
2018-04-10
Completion date
2033-04-10
Last updated
2026-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Due to Leaflet Prolapse

Brief summary

Degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) due to leaflet prolapse is frequent and can be surgically repaired in the vast majority of patients. Despite the efficacy of mitral valve repair, an ongoing international controversy exists regarding the need to perform early surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe MR and no sign of LV dysfunction in whom the probability of successful and durable repair is very high. In this group of patients, differing views of the risks of uncorrected severe MR exist: considered as benign by those supporting medical "watchful waiting" or associated with significant excess mortality/morbidity by those advocating early surgery. This controversy can only be resolved by a randomized controlled trial which is still lacking. The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority of early mitral valve repair in patients with asymptomatic severe MR due to leaflet prolapse compared to an initial conservative management in terms of all-cause death and cardiovascular morbidity during five years follow-up.

Detailed description

Experimental group: In patients randomized to early mitral valve repair, surgery will be performed within 3 months after randomization. Clinical interview will be performed at discharge, at 6 months and afterwards yearly until the end of follow-up. Echocardiography will be performed at discharge, at 6 months and at the end of follow-up. Control group: Patients randomized to initial conservative management will be followed up by clinical interview and echocardiography every 6 months. Patients will be instructed to report any change in functional status in a prompt manner. Surgery will be indicated at the onset of symptoms or if one or more of the following occur during follow-up: LV end-systolic diameter \>40mm, LV ejection fraction \<60%, recurrent atrial fibrillation, or resting systolic pulmonary artery pressure \>50mmHg.

Interventions

PROCEDURESurgery

Early mitral valve repair

OTHERClinical interview and echocardiography

Clinical interview and echocardiography every 6 months.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Asymptomatic patients according history or an exercise test in those able to perform it if there is a doubt about the absence of symptoms * Severe (grade IV) degenerative MR due to leaflet prolapse assessed by echocardiography * LV ejection fraction by Simpson biplane method ≥60% and LV end-systolic diameter by TM echocardiography ≤40mm * Sinus rhythm on the inclusion ECG * Pulmonary artery pressure ≤50 mmHg by Doppler echocardiography. * High probability of mitral valve repair * EuroSCORE II ≤ 3%

Exclusion criteria

* Mitral stenosis or \> mild aortic valve disease (stenosis or regurgitation) * Congenital heart disease (except patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect) * Patients with cardiac prostheses * Previous myocardial infarction * Previous cardiac surgery * Extra cardiac comorbidity with life expectancy \< 5 years * Recent history of psychiatric disease (including drug or alcohol abuse) * Therapy with an investigational intervention at the time of screening or plan to enrol patient in additional intervention study during participation in this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
death and occurrence of adverse cardiovascular eventsduring 5 yearsTime from randomization to the first occurrence of one of the following composite end-point including all-cause death and occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events (heart failure, atrial fibrillation, infective endocarditis, cerebrovascular events).

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTChristophe TRIBOUILLOY, MD, phD
tribouilloy.christophe@chu-amiens.fr322 087 250
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristophe TRIBOUILLOY, MD, PhD

CHU Amiens

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 14, 2026