Skip to content

Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Infants After Extubation

Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Infants After Extubation: A Randomised Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03388437
Enrollment
36
Registered
2018-01-03
Start date
2017-05-01
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2021-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prematurity, Respiratory Failure, Ventilator Lung; Newborn

Keywords

Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist NI-NAVA, Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation NIPPV, post extubation

Brief summary

Non-invasive respiratory support has been emerging in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants to minimise the risk of lung injury. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) provides a method of augmenting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by delivering ventilator breaths via nasal prongs.It may increase tidal volume, improve gas exchange and reduce work of breathing. However, NIPPV may associate with patient-ventilator asynchrony that can cause poor tolerance and risk of intubation. It may also in increased risk of pneumothorax and bowel perforation because of increase in intrathoracic pressure. On the other hand, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a newer mode of ventilation, which has the potential to overcome these challenges. It uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) as a signal to synchronise the mechanical ventilatory breaths and deliver an inspiratory pressure based on this electrical activity. Comparing NI-NAVA and NIPPV in preterm infants, has shown that NI-NAVA improved the synchronization between patient and ventilator and decreased diaphragm work of breathing . There is lack of data on the use of NI-NAVA in neonates post extubation in the literature. To date, no study has focused on short-term impacts. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the need of additional ventilatory support post extubation of NI-NAVA and NIPPV and also the risk of developing adverse outcomes. Aim: The aim is to compare NI-NAVA & NIPPV in terms of extubation failure in infants\< 32 weeks gestation. Hypothesis: Investigators hypothesized that infants born prematurely \< 32 weeks gestation who extubated to NI-NAVA have a lower risk of extubation failure and need of additional ventilatory support.

Detailed description

Study Design: Randomised controlled trial Study Setting: single center NICU level III, KFAFH tertiary care center , Jeddah Saudi Arabia

Interventions

DEVICENI-NAVA

Enrolled infants will receive Surfactant and loading dose of Caffeine citrate prior to extubation. The criteria for extubation will be as per attending decision. The device is used Servo-I ventilator (MAQUET). FiO 2 % is adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-94% on pulse oximetry. The flow rate is 8-10 L/min. NAVA electrodes will be inserted within nasogastric catheter & positioned at the level of diaphragm.Vital signs and ventilatory parameters are monitored hourly. Blood gases will be measured before and one hour after extubation

DEVICENIPPV

Enrolled infants will receive Surfactant and loading dose of Caffeine citrate prior to extubation. The criteria for extubation will be as per attending decision. The device is used Servo-I ventilator (MAQUET). FiO 2 % is adjusted to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-94% on pulse oximetry. The flow rate is 8-10 L/min. NAVA electrodes will be inserted within nasogastric catheter & positioned at the level of diaphragm.Vital signs and ventilatory parameters are monitored hourly. Blood gases will be measured before and one hour after extubation

Sponsors

King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomised controlled trial * A web generated a block randomisation list. * A block of 4, stratification based on GA, gender & antenatal steriods * Sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelopes * Restricted access to envelopes

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 2 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Born less than 32 weeks gestation with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and requiring endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilation. 2. Less than two weeks old 3. First extubation attempt 4. CRIB score 0-5 5. Written-informed parental consent for the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Major congenital malformations or respiratory abnormalities 2. Neuromuscular disease 3. phrenic nerve palsy 4. Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade III or IV 5. Absence of informed consent 6. Out born infants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment failure72 hours1. Treatment failure during the first 72 hours post-extubation. 2. Reintubation (failure of extubation) within 72 hours' post extubation. Treatment failure is defined as: * Hypoxia (FiO 2 requirement \> 0.35) * Respiratory acidosis defined as pH \< 7.2 & PCo2\> 60 mmHg * Major apnea requiring mask ventilation or \> 4 episodes/ hour. The protocol will discontinue according to treatment failure criteria as mentioned above. Rescue treatment with NIPPV will be allowed and will be considered as treatment failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death prior to discharge90 days from birthDeath
Intraventricular haemorrhage IVH (grades III & IV)7 days after extubationdefined as haemorrhage causing ventricular dilatation with or without brain parenchymal involvement
Pneumothorax7 days after extubationdiagnosed radiologically
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)36 weeks' postmenstrual agedefined as requirement for supplemental oxygen at 28 days of life or requirement for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age
Necrotizing enterocolitis7 days after extubationdefined according to modified Bell's criteria (stage 2 to 3)
Gastrointestinal perforation7 days after extubationdiagnosed radiologically or at operation
Nosocomial sepsis7 days after extubationdefined as positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures taken after five days of age
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)40 weeks corrected postnatal agestage 3 or greater (International classification)
Duration of hospitalisation or Length of stay (in days)From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 6 monthsNumber of days in hospital until first discharge

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026