TOX NEG Trial: Clostridium Difficile Diagnosis and Treatment

Clostridium Difficile Infection, Diarrhea

Clostridium difficile, Diarrhea

The purpose of this study is to determine the risks and benefits of antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among patients whose stool samples are nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) positive and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) negative for C. difficile. Currently, healthcare facilities use a wide variety of tests and strategies for identifying patients with CDI; both EIA and NAAT are widely used. There is no clear gold standard for identifying CDI. At WUSM and BJH, patients are only treated for CDI if they have a positive EIA. However, at many other healthcare facilities, the standard of care is to treat for CDI if the patient is NAAT positive. Some patients who are NAAT-positive may not have true CDI; while this treatment is standard of care at many facilities, the risk and benefits of treating these patients for CDI is unknown. We propose to perform a double blinded, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of antimicrobial of patients who are EIA negative, NAAT positive to determine the risks and benefits of CDI treatment in this population.

Study Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the risks and benefits of antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among patients whose stool samples are nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) positive and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) negative for C. difficile. Background: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. There is no gold standard diagnostic test for (CDI). Commercially available assays detect C. difficile or its toxins in stool. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are much more sensitive than toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIA). However, clinical correlation is needed to determine who has CDI. Most US clinical microbiology laboratories have adopted NAATs for C. difficile under the presumption the enhanced analytical sensitivity was beneficial. Although some patients with NAAT-positive/toxin-negative stool have CDI and a false-negative toxin EIA, subsequent studies indicate most patients with NAAT-positive / toxin-negative stool do not have CDI. Rather, they are asymptomatic C. difficile carriers who have diarrhea for other reasons. Most of these studies also have limitations and considerable controversy remains for whether NAATs or toxin EIAs should be used when CDI is suspected. Treatment of asymptomatic C. difficile carriers is not beneficial, and may result in harm. At hospitals that utilize NAATs, most patients with NAAT-positive / toxin-negative stool receive treatment for CDI. The most common treatments for CDI, metronidazole and oral vancomycin, are highly disruptive of the intestinal microbiome. These antimicrobials create selective pressures that promote the acquisition and proliferation of antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO), including public health threats such as MDRO Enterobacteriaceae like carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and the latest emerging threat Candida auris. This leads to MDRO infections and MDRO spread to others. Paradoxically, unnecessary treatment for CDI may increase risk for CDI once treatment is stopped contributing to CDI-related adverse events and C. difficile spread to others. Unnecessary CDI treatment potentially harms both that patient and other people. Whether the benefit of treating patients with NAAT-positive/toxin-negative stool that are missed cases of CDI outweighs the risk of treating patients with NAAT-positive/toxin-negative stool that are asymptomatic C. difficile carriers remains unknown. This study is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial of CDI treatment for patients with NAAT-positive / toxin-negative stool. Such a trial is necessary to understand the risk-benefit of treating these patients for CDI. Patients with NAAT-positive / toxin-negative stool who consent to participate will be randomized to 10 days of oral vancomycin or placebo. Stool and environmental specimens will be obtained at regular time points and interrogated with culturomic and metagenomic methods. Patients will be followed until eight weeks after discontinuation of study drug. These data and specimens will be used to determine the impact of oral vancomycin versus placebo on the microbiome, C. difficile and MDRO colonization, environmental contamination, duration of diarrhea, CDI-related adverse events, and death. Specific aims and hypotheses: Specific Aim 1: Determine if there are differences in microbiome disruption and acquisition / persistence of C. difficile and other MDRO carriage in stool among patients with NAAT-positive / toxin-negative stool who are randomized to a 10-day course of oral vancomycin versus placebo. Hypotheses: Study participants who receive oral vancomycin will have greater disruption of the taxonomic and functional metabolic profiles of the fecal microbiome, increases in antimicrobial resistance genes, acquire more MDRO, and will have greater persistence and abundance of MDRO in stool compared to participants who receive placebo. Participants who receive oral vancomycin will not have detectable C. difficile in stool after completion of study drug, but will be more likely to have C. difficile in stool at week 8 after completion of study drug compared to participants who receive placebo. Specific Aim 2: Determine if there are differences in C. difficile and other MDRO environmental contamination between treatment groups. Hypothesis: Study participants who receive oral vancomycin will have less environmental C. difficile contamination but more MDRO contamination compared to participants who receive placebo while receiving study drug. After study drug is completed, those who receive oral vancomycin will have more environmental contamination due to both C. difficile and other MDROs. Specific Aim 3: Determine if there are differences in CDI-related outcomes between groups. Hypothesis: There will be no difference in time to resolution of diarrhea or CDI-related outcomes between treatment groups.

Papers published before 2008-02-04 may not appear yet. Historical indexing is in progress.

United States

Participants by arm