Skip to content

Assessment of Treatment Patterns of Severe Asthmatic Patients Across the Gulf Region - SevEos Study

Assessment of Treatment Patterns of Severe Asthmatic Patients Across the Gulf Region - SevEos Study SevEos is a Cross-sectional, Multi-center, Non-interventional Study Aimed to Describe the Treatment Patterns in 250 Severe Asthma Patients Across the Gulf Region.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03387722
Acronym
SevEos
Enrollment
253
Registered
2018-01-02
Start date
2017-12-31
Completion date
2019-01-03
Last updated
2020-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Asthma

Brief summary

SevEos is a cross-sectional, multi-center, non-interventional study aimed to describe the treatment patterns in 250 severe asthma patients across the Gulf region. In addition, the study will determine the current level of asthma control and quality of life in these patients; describe the exacerbation patterns; and determine the current levels of blood eosinophils for the enrolled patients.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to describe the treatments patterns of severe asthmatic patients across four Gulf countries during the past year. Secondary Objectives 1. To determine the current level of asthma control in these patients. In addition, a comparison of uncontrolled asthma between those with a eosinophilic count ≥ 300 cell/μl and those with an elevated eosinophilic count less than that. 2. To determine the current and past year levels of blood eosinophils, and the percentage of patients with elevated eosinophilic level ≥ 150 cells/μL and ≥ 300 cells/μL 3. To describe the frequency of exacerbations during the past year. 4. To assess the current quality of life (QoL) of these patients. 5. To determine the past year levels of serum IgE. 6. Exploratory objective: To determine the past year levels of other inflammatory biomarkers like periostin and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To be included in this study, patients (both male and female) must fulfill all of the following criteria: 1. Age above 12 years. 2. Body weight of ≥40 kg. 3. Diagnosed by a physician with severe asthma, who requires regular treatment with medium or high dosage Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) (patients aged 12-17 years) OR high-dosage ICS ( plus Long-Acting Beta Agonist (LABA) for at least 1 year before enrolment. \[Note that the value of the medium/high dosage is dependent on the type of ICS

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria are ineligible to participate in the study: 1. Patient refuses to consent. 2. Another clinically important pulmonary disease is considered to be the primary diagnosis, other than severe asthma (i.e.: COPD, major bronchiectasis, active tuberculosis, and other conditions considered by the principal investigator). 3. Mentally disabled patient or inability to understand the study questions. 4. Unable to read/write.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Asthma treatment and its patterns through dosage1 YearChanges in Asthma treatment stages during the last year based on the dosage: * Short-acting: muscarinic antagonists (SAMA), * long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), * Long-acting Beta agonist (LABA), * Corticosteroids (Inhaled(ICS), Oral(OCS) & Parental), * Theophylline, * Biologics.
Asthma treatment and its patterns through generic names.1 yearChanges in Asthma treatment stages during the last year based on the number of prescribed: * Short-acting: muscarinic antagonists (SAMA), * long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), * Long-acting Beta agonist (LABA), * Corticosteroids (Inhaled(ICS), Oral(OCS) & Parental), * Theophylline, * Biologics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exacerbations1 yearCollection of exacerbations records based on history of documented Emergency Room(ER),hospital visits and hospitalizations (asthma-related)
quality of life (QoL)1 yearQuality of life will be assed using Asthma Quality of life Questionnaire with Standardised Activities, a questionnaire developed by Elizabeth Juniper( MCSP, MSc Professor, 20 Marcuse Fields Bosham, West Sussex PO18 8NA, England) to measure the functional problems (physical, emotional, social and occupational) that are most troublesome for patients with asthma. There are 32 questions in the questoinnaire and they are in 4 domains (symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental stimuli). Patients are asked during the previous two weeks and to respond to 32 questions on a 7-point scale (7 = not impaired at all - 1 = severely impaired). Scores range 1-7, higher scores indicating better quality of life. The better outcome is of higher score value, 0 (totally controlled), 6 (severely uncontrolled).
Eosinophil count1 yearProportion of severe asthmatics with eosinophil count (threshold ≥150cells/μL and ≥300 cells/μL) based on current/most recent blood eosinophil level during the past year.
level of blood eosinophil.1 YearMean or median level of blood eosinophil during the past year.
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume1 YearPre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 sec
Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume1 YearPost-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 sec
Pre-bronchodilator expiratory forced vital capacity1 YearPre-bronchodilator expiratory forced vital capacity in 1 sec
Post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity1 YearPost-bronchodilator forced vital capacity in 1 sec
Total serum IgE1 YearMean or median levels of total serum IgE during the past year.
Asthma Control1 yearAsthma control will be assed using The Asthma Control Questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed by Elizabeth Juniper( MCSP, MSc Professor, 20 Marcuse Fields) Bosham, West Sussex PO18 8NA, England), to measure both the adequacy of asthma control and change in asthma control, which occurs either spontaneously or as a result of treatment. Patients are asked to respond to questions on a 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6= maximum impairment). The questions are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of the 7 questions and therefore between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). A change or difference in score of 0.5 is the smallest that can be considered clinically important.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periostin level1 yearMean or median of levels of Last Periostin level during the past year
FeNO level1 YearMean or median of levels Last FeNO level during the past year

Countries

Oman, United Arab Emirates

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026